JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Tuesday, July 8, 2025

CLOSED-LOOP RECYCLING SYSTEM FOR BEVERAGE CONTAINERS

by

Guardian Media
2330 days ago
20190219

T&T Man­u­fac­tur­ers' As­so­ci­a­tion

De­vel­oped and non-de­vel­oped coun­tries across the globe have, for many decades, suc­cess­ful­ly op­er­at­ed closed-loop re­cy­cling sys­tems for bev­er­age con­tain­ers. The guid­ing prin­ci­ple be­hind this is to en­sure that once these bev­er­ages are con­sumed, the bot­tles are re­turned to their point of ori­gin, ei­ther for re­cy­cling there­in, for ex­port, or re-use (where pos­si­ble).

Ef­fec­tive op­er­a­tion of such a sys­tem in any coun­try dic­tates that pro­duc­ers, re­tail­ers, con­sumers, and col­lec­tors are cog­nisant of what is re­quired of them at each stage of what is of­ten de­scribed as a “De­posit-Re­fund Mech­a­nism”. Such cog­ni­sance is fa­cil­i­tat­ed by leg­is­la­tion that is clear, well struc­tured, clut­ter-free and easy to im­ple­ment. Large coun­tries such as Cana­da, as well as small­er coun­tries such as Bar­ba­dos, have demon­strat­ed the ef­fec­tive in­ter­play of sound leg­is­la­tion, sup­port­ed by ef­fec­tive im­ple­men­ta­tion and stake­hold­er buy-in. This cre­ates an eco-sys­tem that al­lows the fun­da­men­tal goal of bev­er­age con­tain­er waste min­imi­sa­tion to be at­tained.

What ex­act­ly is “closed-loop re­cy­cling”? This term was cre­at­ed to de­scribe a sys­tem in which bev­er­age con­tain­ers, or any oth­er form of re­cy­clable prod­ucts, move from, and back to, their orig­i­nal point of man­u­fac­ture and are re­cy­cled. The de­posit-re­fund mech­a­nism leg­isla­tive­ly man­dates the man­u­fac­tur­er of the bev­er­age con­tain­er to add on a de­posit (the amount of which is stip­u­lat­ed by the leg­is­la­tion) to the price of the fi­nal prod­uct that's con­tained in it. This de­posit is then paid, all to­geth­er, by the re­tail­ers that pur­chase the prod­ucts from the man­u­fac­tur­er.

When the re­tail­ers sell the prod­ucts in­di­vid­u­al­ly to con­sumers, they would “re­lay” or pass on the de­posit to the con­sumers. The quan­tum of such de­posits, ide­al­ly, should be stat­ed clear­ly on the la­bel of each bev­er­age con­tain­er as a sep­a­rate charge, for full dis­clo­sure to re­tail­ers and con­sumers. In par­tic­u­lar, it would prove use­ful to con­sumers as a re­minder that they can ac­cess a re­fund, once the con­tain­er is re­turned ap­pro­pri­ate­ly. In ad­di­tion, strong and ef­fec­tive con­sumer aware­ness cam­paigns re­gard­ing the de­posit-re­fund would fur­ther aid in the de­sired goal of 100 per cent re­turn of bev­er­age con­tain­ers by con­sumers.

The even­tu­al re­turn of the emp­ty bev­er­age con­tain­er by the con­sumer, ini­ti­ates the process of re­funds be­ing is­sued, es­sen­tial­ly a re­ver­sal of the de­posit mech­a­nism. Con­sumers would re­turn the con­tain­ers to col­lec­tion points and re­ceive a re­fund of their de­posit. This pay­ment fur­ther sub­stan­ti­ates the need for clear iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of the de­posit to be paid on each con­tain­er la­bel (as men­tioned above).

'Clos­ing of the loop'

It fol­lows that the re­tail­er would re­turn the emp­ty bev­er­age con­tain­ers to the man­u­fac­tur­er and be re­fund­ed the to­tal de­posits at­trib­ut­able, based on the num­ber of con­tain­ers that have been re­turned. In some in­stances, the con­tain­er man­u­fac­tur­er may re­ceive them di­rect­ly from the re­tail­er and is­sue the to­tal re­fund; in oth­er in­stances, a “col­lec­tor” may col­lect the con­tain­ers, pay the re­funds to the re­tail­ers, and trans­port them to the man­u­fac­tur­ers, who would re­ceive the re­funds plus a “mark-up” for the ser­vice pro­vid­ed. Once the man­u­fac­tur­er has re­ceived their orig­i­nal­ly man­u­fac­tured con­tain­ers, this ef­fec­tive­ly brings to an end the de­posit-re­fund mech­a­nism. The “clos­ing of the loop” takes place when the con­tain­ers are re­cy­cled or re-used, an ide­al sce­nario that ben­e­fits every­one through waste re­duc­tion and cost min­imi­sa­tion.

This de­scrip­tion of a de­posit-re­fund sys­tem is prac­ti­cal, yet some­what sim­plis­tic. The un­ex­plained com­plex­i­ty de­rives from the fact that the point of ori­gin of a bev­er­age con­tain­er is not al­ways easy to as­cer­tain, as the man­u­fac­tur­ers of the prod­uct and the bev­er­ages are not al­ways one and the same. Some ex­am­ples of di­ver­gence would be lo­cal or for­eign con­tain­er man­u­fac­tur­ers who sell them to the man­u­fac­tur­ers of the prod­ucts. In such cas­es, the con­tain­er man­u­fac­tur­er would hold fi­nal li­a­bil­i­ty for pay­ment of the re­funds. In oth­er in­stances, the fin­ished prod­uct is im­port­ed in­to the coun­try but is still gov­erned by the lo­cal leg­is­la­tion and de­posit-re­fund sys­tem. This may then bring a coun­try's Cus­toms and Ex­cise Di­vi­sion in­to play at the point of im­por­ta­tion, to en­sure that the de­posits are paid for all in­com­ing prod­ucts cov­ered by the law.

An­oth­er point of pos­si­ble un­cer­tain­ty is the re­turn of bev­er­age con­tain­ers with­out la­bels. This makes it dif­fi­cult to de­ter­mine which com­pa­ny orig­i­nal­ly man­u­fac­tured the con­tain­er and are there­fore li­able to pay the re­fund (un­less there is a unique iden­ti­fi­er en­graved in­to the ac­tu­al con­tain­er it­self). This may be over­come by con­sumers be­ing di­rect­ed, ei­ther by law or by the clear­ly stat­ed pol­i­cy of re­tail­ers, that con­tain­ers would on­ly be re­ceived for a re­fund if they are re­turned in their orig­i­nal con­di­tion (with the la­bel in­tact).

There are, po­ten­tial­ly, oth­er con­sid­er­a­tions that can arise along the var­i­ous el­e­ments of the de­posit-re­fund sys­tem. For T&T, it is im­per­a­tive that leg­is­la­tion is very well craft­ed, with all stake­hold­ers be­ing in­volved in the con­sul­ta­tive process that in­forms it. Be­fore leg­is­la­tion is im­ple­ment­ed in our coun­try, there must al­so be an ef­fec­tive plan to deal with ex­ist­ing emp­ty bev­er­age con­tain­ers that are in the land­fills, so as to pre­vent op­por­tunis­tic “con­sumers” from pre­sent­ing them for an un­de­serv­ing re­fund. This would be a re­spon­si­bil­i­ty of the gov­ern­ment min­istry or agency that has ju­ris­dic­tion over the de­posit-re­fund sys­tem.

Most im­por­tant­ly, its worth re­it­er­a­tion that all stake­hold­ers in­volved have a de­gree of re­spon­si­bil­i­ty in en­sur­ing that they do what is re­quired of them by law, if or when it comes in­to ef­fect. Fail­ure to do so should be puni­tive enough to im­pel the guilty par­ty to take cor­rec­tive ac­tion. In par­tic­u­lar, con­sumer knowl­edge, un­der­stand­ing, and aware­ness is key to bev­er­age con­tain­ers be­ing re­turned in an ap­pro­pri­ate form; with­out this, the law will not have the ca­pac­i­ty to ful­fil its in­tend­ed pur­pose.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored

Today's
Guardian

Publications

A model in a costume from The Lost Tribe’s 2026 presentation Island Circus

A model in a costume from The Lost Tribe’s 2026 presentation Island Circus

KERWIN PIERRE

A model in a costume from The Lost Tribe’s 2026 presentation Island Circus

A model in a costume from The Lost Tribe’s 2026 presentation Island Circus

KERWIN PIERRE

Ringmasters of the Road: Crowds flock to Tribe’s circus-themed band launch

8 hours ago
Students, principal and staff of St David’s RC Primary, along with the UWTT and Scotiabank Foundation teams at the handover of steelpans at the school.

Students, principal and staff of St David’s RC Primary, along with the UWTT and Scotiabank Foundation teams at the handover of steelpans at the school.

Students, principal and staff of St David’s RC Primary, along with the UWTT and Scotiabank Foundation teams at the handover of steelpans at the school.

Students, principal and staff of St David’s RC Primary, along with the UWTT and Scotiabank Foundation teams at the handover of steelpans at the school.

Scotiabank Foundation, United Way donate steelpans

8 hours ago
The Executive of the National Parang Association 2025-27. Back row, from left: Kervin Preudhomme, assistant secretary; Shaquille Headley, committee member; Cheriese Pierre, committee member; Lisa Lee, trustee; Joanne Briggs, PRO; Yarelis Touissant, committee member; William Calliste, trustee. Front row, from left: Jenais Carter, secretary; Alicia Jaggasar, president; Henrietta Carter, vice president; Joseph Bertrand, youth officer. Missing: Kerrylee Chee Chow, treasurer; Chevone Pierre, committee member.

The Executive of the National Parang Association 2025-27. Back row, from left: Kervin Preudhomme, assistant secretary; Shaquille Headley, committee member; Cheriese Pierre, committee member; Lisa Lee, trustee; Joanne Briggs, PRO; Yarelis Touissant, committee member; William Calliste, trustee. Front row, from left: Jenais Carter, secretary; Alicia Jaggasar, president; Henrietta Carter, vice president; Joseph Bertrand, youth officer. Missing: Kerrylee Chee Chow, treasurer; Chevone Pierre, committee member.

The Executive of the National Parang Association 2025-27. Back row, from left: Kervin Preudhomme, assistant secretary; Shaquille Headley, committee member; Cheriese Pierre, committee member; Lisa Lee, trustee; Joanne Briggs, PRO; Yarelis Touissant, committee member; William Calliste, trustee. Front row, from left: Jenais Carter, secretary; Alicia Jaggasar, president; Henrietta Carter, vice president; Joseph Bertrand, youth officer. Missing: Kerrylee Chee Chow, treasurer; Chevone Pierre, committee member.

The Executive of the National Parang Association 2025-27. Back row, from left: Kervin Preudhomme, assistant secretary; Shaquille Headley, committee member; Cheriese Pierre, committee member; Lisa Lee, trustee; Joanne Briggs, PRO; Yarelis Touissant, committee member; William Calliste, trustee. Front row, from left: Jenais Carter, secretary; Alicia Jaggasar, president; Henrietta Carter, vice president; Joseph Bertrand, youth officer. Missing: Kerrylee Chee Chow, treasurer; Chevone Pierre, committee member.

Jaggasar returns as National Parang president

Yesterday
Charles Town junior drummers and dancers take to the stage

Charles Town junior drummers and dancers take to the stage

Charles Town junior drummers and dancers take to the stage

Charles Town junior drummers and dancers take to the stage

Jamaican Maroons celebrate, question land rights

Yesterday