Tony Rakhal-Fraser,
“Ball of confusion, that’s what the world is today ... round and round we go, where the world’s headed nobody knows ... people all over the world are shouting end the war ... and the band plays on.” Temptations...1970s...an historic period of revolt and hope.
I am choosing to interpret the results of three major elections internationally over the last month in the USA, Israel and Serbia as illustrations of voter dissatisfaction with the quality of governance received and the continuing search for a new world of political functioning.
I have previously illustrated such a polity using the example of Trinidad and Tobago, that is, that electors are dissatisfied with the performance of governments and so they keep moving them in and out in the hope, and without options, that a learning experience in opposition can assist to produce a better quality performance.
One month short of two years since taking office, the American electorate has unceremoniously swept President Donald Trump’s Republican party into the opposition in the Congress and the Senate. And while Trump may claim that he was not on the ballot in the election, the undeniable fact is that his governance, his policies and programmes, locally and internationally, were the issues upon which the electorate voted.
Trump’s continuous boasting of his “never before seen” achievements, including the billions and billions brought in by his tariff impositions. His offer of a US$5,000 incentive/bribe to electors to vote, his repeated claims of overwhelming war success against Iran, and his kidnapping of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and the control of that country’s oil reserves were all part of his governance record over the 18 months of his presidency.
To compound the maddening irrelevance of President Trump, he spent the morning after the election, drawn to the site of his Grand Ballroom built to dazzle and entertain the capitalist elite of American society.
It is yet another example of how far politicians can be from the reality of the living, suffering, the ambitions and hopes dashed by governance failures and why they have been shifting them into and out of office.
In contrast to Trump and the Republican party’s implosion after a short stay in government, is the 30-year stint of Bibi Netanyahu’s Likud party in Israel. There, the enormity of the consequences of an electorate refusing to give the absolute majority required to the incumbent has to be judged on the life-and-death issues at stake for the Jewish electorate.
Given Netanyahu’s record of dealing brutally with any challenge to Jewish/Zionist supremacy in Israel, he could have been expected to easily receive the majority required to hold on to office as the protector of the Jewish state.
But notwithstanding that deep reliance on Netanyahu and his Likud party to eliminate what is considered the generational nightmare of an Arab/Muslim “terrorist” attempt to thwart the hope of the creation of a “Greater Israel”, the electorate chose not to give the majority to Netanyahu.
It’s also interesting that the electorally long-dormant Arab-Israeli population gained the confidence and desire to vote in large numbers, no doubt the hope being to change the politics to win recognition of their citizenship in a country they had made their home for over 1000 years before the Nakba, the Palestinian displacement of 1949.
The most interesting political development of an electorate seeking meaningful representation after decades of governments failing to meet their needs occurred in Serbia, one of the countries created out of the breakup of General Tito’s Yugoslavia. Tired of the three political coalitions which have been voted in and out of office over the last 25 years, the electorate placed in office a loose grouping of students and young people outside of a traditional political party system to seek quality governance.
It was, and continues to be, an expression of frustration and annoyance with the poor representation they have received from the traditional parties.
The political stalemate and deep frustration with the established party system and the conventional parties and the instability have been going on in France and Italy for many decades. Germany has also had regular shifting around amongst traditional parties over the decades. Six prime ministers have been sworn into office in England in ten years.
On the other side, the communist states, China, North Korea and Cuba, are officially described as single-party states. Russia is however considered a dominant party state with small parties having little chance of capturing sufficient seats to win an election to give the possibility of another form of governance.
The Chinese can boast that the severely restricted political system they have operated since 1949, updated on a couple of occasions, has resulted in remarkable economic expansion and development.
As written about in several columns over time, our two-party system here in Trinidad and Tobago is steeped in mobilisation and governance based on race by the two major parties and has resulted over time in the continuing failure to achieve a cohesive society with a dynamic political party culture.
Tony Rakhal-Fraser, freelance journalist, former reporter/current affairs programme producer, and news director at TTT, programme producer, current affairs director at Radio Trinidad, former correspondent for the BBC Caribbean Service, writer for the Associated Press, graduate of UWI, CARIMAC, Mona in Mass Communications, history, politics, economics, and from the Institute of International Relations, UWI, St Augustine.
