JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, July 13, 2025

Keeping a close eye on Gary

by

Guardian Media
2329 days ago
20190225
Ryan Hadeed

Ryan Hadeed

Allan Ganpat

Ryan Hadeed

I'm a huge Sean Con­nery fan. And al­though he is best known for his stint as the British su­per­spy, James Bond, I pre­fer his post-Bond work, por­tray­ing char­ac­ters that are old­er and more thought­ful. One of my favourites is The Un­touch­ables, a 1987 Amer­i­can gang­ster film about Pro­hi­bi­tion-era Chica­go and loose­ly based on the ex­ploits of Eliot Ness, a fed­er­al agent work­ing to take down the crime syn­di­cate of Al Capone. Con­nery stars as James Mal­one, a vet­er­an "beat cop" who is re­cruit­ed by Ness for his ex­pe­ri­ence and in­cor­rupt­ibil­i­ty. Be­fore agree­ing to join, Mal­one ques­tions Ness as to how far he is will­ing to go to com­bat or­gan­ised crime in the city, im­ply­ing that it will take more than sim­ple de­ter­mi­na­tion and strict ad­her­ence to po­lice pro­ce­dure. Not long af­ter that blunt con­ver­sa­tion, Mal­one leads Ness' team of "un­touch­ables", so nick­named for their rep­u­ta­tion of op­er­at­ing above the law, on their first liquor raid.

Act­ing with­out of­fi­cial in­tel­li­gence or a search war­rant, he states "Every­one knows where the booze is. The prob­lem isn't find­ing it…the prob­lem is 'who wants to cross Capone'." Their first bust is a suc­cess; a mi­nor one at best. But it nonethe­less sends a clear mes­sage to the city's po­lice force, the crim­i­nal el­e­ments, and the pub­lic that things are go­ing to change.

News on crime took a se­ries of in­ter­est­ing set of twists and turns in the past few weeks. There was the re­port that po­lice of­fi­cers were pro­vid­ing es­cort ser­vices to fete go­ers. Then the high-pro­file in­ter­dic­tion of a sex traf­fick­ing ring. And fi­nal­ly, the in­ves­tiga­tive re­port re­veal­ing that sus­pect­ed gang lead­ers had been award­ed gov­ern­ment con­tracts. You know…none of those things sur­pris­es me, and I'm will­ing to bet that I'm not the on­ly one who feels that way. News like that on­ly adds cre­dence to the pop­u­lar catch­phrase that "Trinidad is not a re­al place." Be­cause let's be hon­est, we've all heard the ru­mours that such things were go­ing on; our coun­try makes a mo­rose joke of har­bour­ing se­crets that are pub­li­cal­ly known. Long has there been "talk", both on the streets and in high so­ci­ety, that "some po­lice does have a side hus­tle" or "dat is de place where all dem Span­ish h... does be". And, most fla­grant of them all, let's not for­get the now in­fa­mous pho­to of Cedric "Burkie" Burke, a sus­pect­ed gang leader, pos­ing next to our Pres­i­dent, dur­ing a state func­tion, as a "guest' of an MP; as if we need­ed any more proof of the Gov­ern­ment's col­lu­sion with crim­i­nal el­e­ments. To para­phrase Of­fi­cer Mal­one—every­one knows about these il­le­gal en­ter­pris­es…the prob­lem is find­ing peo­ple who are will­ing to con­front the crim­i­nals and the cor­rup­tion head-on.

'More pomp than sub­stance'

As if an an­swer to our prayers, we got Gary Grif­fith. Af­ter decades of in­ep­ti­tude and cor­rup­tion, both in the T&T Po­lice Ser­vice and the Min­istry of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty, we got us a tough-talk­ing for­mer sol­dier who is will­ing to put his rep­u­ta­tion on the line. Af­ter some six months serv­ing as Com­mis­sion­er of Po­lice, the G-man still en­joys a high ap­proval rat­ing amongst the pub­lic. Good for him. How­ev­er, when one con­sid­ers that the crime rate re­mains un­changed, it begs the ques­tion as to the re­al mea­sure of his ef­fec­tive­ness. Love him or hate him, one can't de­ny Com­mis­sion­er Grif­fith's pen­chant for brava­do. His pres­ence in the field, dressed in tac­ti­cal gear and flanked by armed, masked of­fi­cers, def­i­nite­ly pan­ders to the me­dia and the na­tion­al au­di­ence. That im­age, com­bined with his bel­li­cose rhetoric to­wards the crim­i­nal el­e­ments, has helped him cul­ti­vate a per­sona that he "kicks a.. and takes no pris­on­ers".

What is iron­ic is how he has turned on the very en­ti­ty that helped pro­pel him to crime-fight­ing star­dom. Dur­ing a re­cent ap­pear­ance on CNC3's Morn­ing Brew, he took the me­dia to task—the Guardian in par­tic­u­lar—for in­ter­view­ing Cedric Burke fol­low­ing a po­lice op­er­a­tion at his home. The CoP be­lieves that putting Mr Burke in the spot­light was es­sen­tial­ly glo­ri­fy­ing gang lead­ers and gang cul­ture. I think his crit­i­cism was a bit of a stretch; few in our na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty would be sym­pa­thet­ic to Burkie's dis­tress. And I high­ly doubt that his un­der­lings are avid read­ers of this news­pa­per or any news­pa­per for that mat­ter.

That be­ing said, with all due re­spect to Com­mis­sion­er Grif­fith, I sus­pect that his ire had less to do with the me­dia's re­port­ing and more to do with his meth­ods be­ing brought in­to ques­tion. He of­ten speaks of wag­ing "a war" on crime and the crim­i­nal el­e­ments; ex­treme lan­guage in­deed, but not nec­es­sar­i­ly in­ac­cu­rate. Un­less you've been liv­ing in La La Land or serv­ing in our Par­lia­ment (the same place), it's abun­dant­ly clear that pre­vi­ous tech­niques weren't work­ing. De­spite the mul­ti­tude of stud­ies con­duct­ed and the like­wise amount of ini­tia­tives im­ple­ment­ed, crime con­tin­ued to spi­ral out of con­trol.

There­fore, it's un­der­stand­able why Gary Grif­fith, a for­mer mil­i­tary of­fi­cer, would ap­proach this mat­ter in an un­con­ven­tion­al, boor­ish man­ner, even if it seems to be more pomp than sub­stance. The con­cern, how­ev­er, is that the com­mis­sion­er's state­ments re­veal a will­ing­ness to op­er­ate above the law, even if that means ig­nor­ing prop­er po­lice pro­ce­dure and re­spect­ing the rights of sus­pect­ed crim­i­nals; any­thing to get the job done. Even then, the pub­lic's sup­port for him not on­ly val­i­dates his meth­ods but al­so shows their own will­ing­ness to en­dorse his tak­ing of such dra­con­ian mea­sures. Need­less to say, this is a dan­ger­ous mind­set.

For the record, I open­ly sup­port the CoP and the no­tion that des­per­ate times call for des­per­ate mea­sures. Both are the re­sult of a crime sit­u­a­tion that wasn't be­ing dealt with by the rel­e­vant au­thor­i­ties. But in all fair­ness, the fears of Com­mis­sion­er Grif­fith be­com­ing a law un­to him­self are un­found­ed. Apart from his "talk", he has in no way en­croached on civ­il lib­er­ties. The rep­u­ta­tion of act­ing in a man­ner akin to El­liot Ness' Un­touch­ables might just be enough to shake up the sta­tus quo. But if cit­i­zens are cu­ri­ous as to just how far Gary Grif­fith is will­ing to go to clean up our coun­try, I would say that it's a fair ques­tion. And it's in all our best in­ter­est to keep a close eye on him.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored