Prof Hamid Ghany
For the second time in its history, the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ) has had to deal with a substantive exposure of its internal workings. Back in 2014, there was public controversy between its then Registrar, Dr Leighton Jackson, who was on secondment from The University of the West Indies (UWI), and Sir Dennis Byron, Chief Justice and President of the Court.
Last Sunday and all week, the Express has revealed several internal emails between and among CCJ judges about their misgivings within the court. The Regional Judicial and Legal Services Commission (RJLSC) has now been asked to investigate these matters.
We are here again. Back in 2014, the Express reported the following:
“Dr Leighton Jackson was escorted by security off the CCJ compound on May 6, 2014. A letter from Byron to Jackson on the same date stated, ‘The organisation is of the view that you are in breach of fairness to the President and Human Resources Manager and that you have breached your fidelity to the court and undermined any trust and confidence that the organisation may have had in you.’” (Express, July 19, 2014).
In the same article, the following was reported:
“Jackson said he held the acting Registrar post from July 18, 2013 to May 6, 2014, and during that period was never invited to fulfil his role as secretary to the RJLSC. He said he was also never consulted about any restructuring exercise. ‘There seems to be an intolerance of opposing views at the CCJ, and I cannot exist in that’, he said.”
In a press release dated July 25th, 2014, Deputy Chair of the RJLSC, Lloyd Barnett, resisted public statements made by Jackson. Barnett said: “No credence should therefore be attached to the warnings by Dr Jackson of problems relating to the financial or other sustainability of the Court.”
Meanwhile, in the Mona Law Report (2015) Volume 3, a report on Jackson at the UWI Research Days programme on February 10, 2015 stated as follows:
“The presentation examined the constitutionality of the CCJ as the highest court for Commonwealth Caribbean States. Dr Jackson argued that a high court is part of the democratic governance of a state and that the CCJ is a foreign institution which does not take us much further than the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in achieving good governance. He further emphasised that the values underlying the law on which adjudication is made must be decided by Jamaicans for Jamaicans.” (p. 19).
The issues of trust and accountability have been at the heart of the CCJ issue ever since the court was first offered as an appellate substitute for the Privy Council in 2005. The latest controversy raises trust and accountability issues once again.
The issue of trust goes beyond the question of relations between judges. It also involves how the Caribbean public perceives the court. The Registrar who succeeded Jackson in 2014 was Jacqueline Graham, who retired from the court in 2022.
According to the Registrar and Chief Marshall of the CCJ, Mrs Gabrielle Figaro Jones, in the 2022-2023 Annual Report:
“As the new Registrar and Chief Marshall, I must extend my appreciation to the former office holder, the Hon. Mme Justice Jacqueline Josiah-Graham, who dedicated eight years to the Court. Her contribution is recognised and sincerely appreciated. I also thank Mrs Gizel Thomas-Roberts, Deputy Registrar and Marshall, who acted as Registrar and Chief Marshall from September 2022 to February 2023 during the period of transition.” (CCJ Annual Report 2022-2023, p. 25).
Gizel Thomas-Roberts previously contested the Tobago East seat in the 2010 general elections in T&T as the People’s National Movement candidate and lost to Vernella Alleyne-Toppin of the Tobago Organisation of the People (TOP), 7,469 to 5,523 (See Elections and Boundaries Commission 2010 General Election Report, p. 293). Political trust is what will make acceptance of the CCJ happen. The RJLSC is free to hire competent persons to hold senior administrative positions in the court. However, once it hires political activists/candidates into the court administration, regardless of which territory staff come from, the RJLSC cannot expect unanimous acceptance of the court, as there will be distrust by those opposed to the political parties of those activists/candidates.
Last Thursday, the Guardian reported that Heads of Judiciary from Barbados, The Bahamas, Belize, Guyana, Jamaica and T&T as well as the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court issued a statement of confidence in the court.
With these 2026 revelations of infighting between CCJ judges and their Chief Justice, will public confidence in both the original jurisdiction (which applies to all Caricom states) and the appellate jurisdiction, which applies to Barbados, Belize, Dominica, Guyana and St Lucia be diminished?
Professor Hamid Ghany is Professor of Constitutional Affairs and Parliamentary Studies at The University of the West Indies (UWI). He was also appointed an Honorary Professor of The UWI upon his retirement in October 2021. He continues his research and publications and also does some teaching at The UWI. He was selected by the THA to guide the discussions on Tobago autonomy.
