A travesty of justice took place in Santa Rosa on Saturday, and I am not talking about the ten-day suspension given to jockey Christopher Jadoo following the running of race five.
Punters were aghast to see race leader U Crazy Diamond ( 19-1) going wide coming into the home straight with the horse appearing to be travelling all over favourite Frankenstein (4/5), owned by Shivam Maharaj and trained by Derick Mosca, and ridden by Wilmer Galviz. U Crazy Diamond and the other race favourite, Burst of Energy, are also trained by Mosca, though owned by Juan Navarro.
If going wide was not sufficient, for the entire length of the straight, Jadoo stood motionless as he cantered alongside the hard ridden favourite who eventually prevailed by half a length.
For those at the track, you could hear a penny drop.
For those watching the racing channel, it was stunning.
In the age of Instagram and Facebook, social media channels lit up with comments on the outcome of the race.
Following the race, an enquiry was held and Jadoo suspended.
Now let us put that suspension into perspective. Jadoo had, after 13 prior racing days, ridden a mere one race.
For his entire career, Jadoo has ridden 102 winners and is better known for his work on the morning gallops.
As such, a ten-day suspension is likely to place Jadoo at very little disadvantage especially with his weight issues.
Does this ban mean that he will not be able to exercise horses and is Persona Non Grata at all racing tracks?
Is a ten-day suspension adequate or helpful in the current environment that is horseracing in this country?
For years, racing has been plagued with allegations of corruption and jockeys' races and owners/trainers buying off competing riders so as to give their horses an unfair advantage.
This is the first time that the evidence has been so blatant.
It is therefore a perfect opportunity for the authorities to interrogate Jadoo to understand why he would have done what he did.
To achieve this, this matter needs to be referred immediately to the non-existent Racing Authority.
These are the people to determine the appropriate course of action.
To ensure Jadoo's cooperation, the penalty must be under threat of being banned for life from horse racing, not just suspended from riding for ten days.
Jadoo probably did not make this decision on his own, so the TTRA must determine the identity of any others involved.
Loss of his livelihood must be something that Jadoo did not consider when agreeing to participate in that farce.
Of course, he was also not to know that U Crazy Diamond would decide to put it all together and run his best race in a long time.
This case has given the authorities a great opportunity to get to the bottom of some of the corruption that has taken over the sport of kings over the last five years.
While Jadoo was an obvious miscreant, there can be little doubt that he would not have been the only rider in that race to have been contacted by whoever was desirous of securing the unfair advantage and as such, the TTRA should also interrogate every other rider.
The owners of U Crazy Diamond and the brave punters who bet him down to 19/1 were the subjects of fraud.
The decision to suspend Jadoo was therefore the least that the stewards could do.
Both the instigators and Jadoo should be very worried at this moment because depending on how sincere the authorities are, their future involvement in the sport could be in jeopardy.
The real travesty of justice therefore will be if the authorities do not use this case to set an example and to also get to the bottom of one of the bigger corruptions taking place in this country.
Horseracing's image has been seriously damaged...the rest is now up to the Arima Race Club and Racing Authority.
?
