JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, July 4, 2025

Race and Nationalism: Round I: 1956-1961

by

20110518

The Race Mon­ster: Pt 5

The change af­ter the 1956 elec­tion was rapid and fright­en­ing. The poi­so­nous, gen­er­a­tions-long sense of en­ti­tle­ment nursed by the black up­per class, and fed to the un­der­class, once in prox­im­i­ty to pow­er, ig­nit­ed. The Guardian's ed­i­to­r­i­al of Sep­tem­ber 16, 1956, ob­served that Dr Williams's cam­paign was "rous­ing an evil tem­per in the mass­es." On Sep­tem­ber 26, 1956, the TG re­port­ed an ar­son at­tempt on Al­bert Gomes's house, and that one of his chil­dren was "at­tacked" in the streets. A rel­a­tive of Gomes told me the house and fam­i­ly were reg­u­lar­ly at­tacked by PNM sup­port­ers with garbage, dead an­i­mals, and stones.Vic­to­ry did not bring peace. On Ju­ly 21, 1957, ME Far­quhar wrote in the TG: "The gen­er­al feel­ing is one of ap­pre­hen­sion... The colony is in a state of un­healthy fer­ment." On March 13, 1958, the ed­i­to­r­i­al re­port­ed that civ­il ser­vice em­ploy­ees were spy­ing on their su­pe­ri­ors for the gov­ern­ment.

It wors­ened in 1958, af­ter the "hos­tile and re­cal­ci­trant" speech. By 1961, there were open race-po­lit­i­cal clash­es. The re­al­i­ty of PNM gov­er­nance man­i­fest­ed in the po­lice re­sponse to the In­di­ans' re­ports of vi­o­lence. In Sep­tem­ber 1956, a PDP mo­tor­cade in Ch­agua­nas was at­tacked, os­ten­si­bly by PNM sup­port­ers, but PDP sup­port­ers were ar­rest­ed.In 1961, the DLP re­port­ed find­ing fake ID cards, and ev­i­dence of vot­er-padding, but po­lice did noth­ing. States of emer­gency were de­clared in In­di­an ar­eas in 1961, which the DLP said were trig­gered by PNM vi­o­lence, as the po­lice did noth­ing. Sim­i­lar in­ci­dents were re­port­ed in the DLP news­pa­per, The States­man.

The as­sault was mul­ti-pronged. The pre-1961 an­ti-Eu­ro­pean rhe-toric large­ly dis­ap­peared af­ter in­de­pen­dence, and "na­tion­al­ism" was de­signed with In­di­ans, not colo­nial cul­ture, in mind. In 1957 the Di­vi­sion of Cul­ture was formed to be a mid­wife for na­tion­al­is­tic cul­ture (Car­ni­val). Many aca­d­e­mics have not­ed this, but Gor­don Rohlehr's es­say, "The Cul­ture of Williams...", is most de­tailed: In­de­pen­dence na­tion­al cul­ture was de­signed to es­tab­lish the "Cre­ole" world­view as na­tion­al.

This mes­sage was dis­sem­i­nat­ed in ways large and small: from the TTT sign-on voice over "Tri­ni-dad: Home of the steel­band, ca­lyp­so and lim­bo," to ca­lyp­so tents. Na­tion­al me­dia, fes­ti­vals, state sym­bols, and pop cul­ture ex­clud­ed In­di­ans. By the 1970s high­ly vis­i­ble Afro-Amer­i­can pop cul­ture pro­vid­ed a ready-made ethos, which the PNM ap­pro­pri­at­ed. (Iron­i­cal­ly, as African-Ame-ri­cans were be­ing op­pressed by An­glo-Amer­i­can big­otry in the US, In­di­ans were fac­ing PNM Afro-Cre­ole big­otry in Trinidad. Like Gold­stein in Or­well's 1984, In­di­ans were easy scape­goats for the fail­ure of the PNM in every sphere.)

The chaot­ic na­ture the coun­try in the 1960s, and the ubiq­ui­ty of PNM brutish­ness and sup­pres­sion, have been for­got­ten. CLR James and oth­ers were hound­ed out of the coun­try. Gueril­las made war on the State. Hun­dreds of strikes and demon­stra­tions in the 1960s were fol­lowed by re­pres­sive leg­is­la­tion (the In­dus­tri­al Sta­bil­i­sa­tion Act) out­law­ing strik­ing. Rohlehr's "His­to­ry as Ab­sur­di­ty" de­tails Williams's at­tacks on UWI. Aca­d­e­mics (like Kari Levitt) had work per­mits can­celled when they an­gered the ad­min­is­tra­tion in the 1970s.

Dis­sent was al­so "ex­port­ed" via post-in­de­pen­dence mi­gra­tion. Afro and In­do left (250,000 be­tween 1961 and 1990), in­clud­ing am­bi­tious Afro-Trinida­di­ans who were hon­est about what was un­fold­ing. The vac­u­um they left sucked hos­tile small is­landers in­to the black work­ing class, and peas­ant In­di­ans, who were un­pre­pared for di­rect con­fronta­tion with Cre­ole na­tion­al­ism, in­to the In­do mid­dle class. The In­di­ans' cop­ing strat­e­gy re­mained schiz­o­phre­nia: one cul­ture for home, one for the out­side.

This is al­so where the In­di­ans' hid­den his­to­ry re­turns to bite them. Bhadase Maraj had ced­ed DLP lead­er­ship to Dr Rudranath Capildeo to im­prove its elec­tion prospects. Capildeo was a ma­lig­nant nar­cis­sist (aka a mad a--), and frag­ment­ed the al­ready un­sta­ble Bhadase coali­tion. Af­ter this, some low­er caste In­di­ans sup­port­ed the PNM be­cause of their ha­tred of the Brah­min/caste ori­ent­ed DLP. An­thro­pol­o­gist Mor­ton Klass de­scribes the op­pres­sion of low­er castes by up­per in his study of Fe­lic­i­ty in the 1950s, and di­ver­sion of sup­port to the PNM.

The large pic­ture, how­ev­er -ie, what "na­tion­al­ism" re­al­ly meant -was clear. It led to a cul­ture of In­do an­i­mus-a deep mis­trust of Cre­ole so­ci­ety and its in­sti­tu­tions. This anger has been in­ter­pret­ed as "In­di­an ha­tred for Trinidad"-a clas­sic and par­tic­u­lar­ly of­fen­sive PNM trope. In re­al­i­ty, In­do peas­ants love Trinidad the way trees love the earth, and have no need to "prove" it (as il­le­gal im­mi­grants seem com­pelled to, by bawl­ing it out every five min­utes). Many In­di­ans de­spised (and still do) the PNM pas­sion­ate­ly for that, and it eas­i­ly elides in­to racist re­sent­ment, since there is no fo­rum (the "pub­lic sphere" is em­phat­i­cal­ly "Cre­ole") where this can be re­fut­ed.

De­spite the PNM's faint protests to the con­trary, they un­der­stand this dy­nam­ic, and per­pet­u­ate it. Most In­di­ans de­vel­oped cop­ing strate­gies to "get along," but a con­se­quence of this re­sent­ment was a sep­a­ratist move­ment: the In­di­an Re­view Com­mit­tee's jaun­diced fan­ta­sy of a par­ti­tioned Trinidad-"In­desh." Nat­u­ral­ly, this po­si­tion was held up by PNM na­tion­al­ists, and the me­dia, as ev­i­dence of "In­di­an racism," of which all In­di­ans were guilty (be­cause "an In­di­an is an In­di­an is an In­di­an"-Wayne Brown wrote that in the In­de­pen­dent (Nov 13, 1998). It is, of course, now tak­en as ax­iomat­ic).

Sev­er­al works have sketched this post-in­de­pen­dence dy­nam­ic: Naipaul's The Mim­ic Men, Wal­cott's What the Twi­light Says, CLR James's Par­ty Pol­i­tics in the West In­dies. But on­ly mine (Break­ing the News) has ex­am­ined how and why it hap­pened a sec­ond time.To be con­tin­ued


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored