JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, July 26, 2025

Subhas: Strokes on table for gunmen

by

20100712

Laws would soon be in­tro­duced to make it manda­to­ry for gun-tot­ing crim­i­nals to re­ceive strokes if found guilty.

Min­is­ter in the Min­istry of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Sub­ash Pan­day yes­ter­day said by ear­ly next week two spe­cif­ic bills were ex­pect­ed to be in­tro­duced in Par­lia­ment mak­ing it ab­solute for con­vict­ed crim­i­nals to re­ceive cor­po­ral pun­ish­ment:

He iden­ti­fied the bills as:

�2 Amend­ment to Of­fences Against The Per­son Act Chap­ter 11 (8); and,

�2 amend­ment to the Lar­ce­ny Act, Sec­tion 24.

The bills, ac­cord­ing to Pan­day, were aimed specif­i­cal­ly at tack­ling gun-re­lat­ed crimes and sought to re­duce the in­flux of il­le­gal firearms from the streets. Ac­cord­ing to Pan­day, if a per­son is found guilty of griev­ous bod­i­ly harm by us­ing a firearm he could face a max­i­mum of 20 years in prison. He said If some­one al­so was found guilty of rob­bery by us­ing a firearm he could face a max­i­mum of 15 to 20 years in jail. Strokes, how­ev­er, ac­cord­ing to the present law, could on­ly be giv­en if the judge saw it fix, Pan­day ex­plained. He said: "As it is now it is up to the dis­cre­tion of the judge to ad­min­is­ter strokes.

"But we want to change that as soon as pos­si­ble and to make it com­pul­so­ry for strokes to be ad­min­is­tered as part of the pun­ish­ment," a tough-talk­ing Pan­day said dur­ing an in­ter­view yes­ter­day. Say­ing he was work­ing with At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Anand Ramol­gan to "fine­tune" the bills, Pan­day said he was ex­pect­ed to meet with Prime Min­is­ter Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar to have fur­ther dis­cus­sions on the bills.

He added: "The at­tor­ney gen­er­al and my­self still have our work cut out and we will be work­ing on the bills through­out the week. "But we are adamant in erad­i­cat­ing il­le­gal guns from the streets. Once we make a dent in that it would go a long way in re­duc­ing many se­ri­ous crimes, in­clud­ing homi­cides," Pan­day as­sured.

At the week­ly post-Cab­i­net press brief­ing last Thurs­day, Gov­ern­ment in­tro­duced three bills – the Firearms (Amend­ment) Bill, the Bail (Amend­ment) Bill and the An­ti-Gang Bill – al­so to tack­le crime.

More In­fo

Se­nior coun­sel Dana See­ta­hal has ex­pressed con­cern that the pro­posed bills may arise in a con­flict in the sep­a­ra­tion of pow­ers be­tween the state and the ju­di­cia­ry. See­ta­hal point­ed out that while Par­lia­ment pre­scribed the laws it was the ju­di­cia­ry that was in charge of sen­tenc­ing and hence to im­pose the nec­es­sary pun­ish­ment re­quired.

She said: "It ap­pears that for Par­lia­ment to man­date to a court to give cor­po­ral pun­ish­ment there would be a con­flict of the sep­a­ra­tion of pow­ers. "The right to de­ter­mine what the spe­cif­ic sen­tence in a giv­en mat­ter is the pre­rog­a­tive of the court on­ly, so I won­der how this would work?" See­ta­hal ques­tioned. She said, how­ev­er, there was one ex­cep­tion where in the case of mur­der the penal­ty was al­ready "set" and that was death.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored