JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, July 25, 2025

Bringing Bridgens out of the shadows

by

20160417

LAA: What is your new book about?

JR: It's about the pic­tures drawn by an Eng­lish-born artist, Richard Brid­gens, who spent 20 years in Trinidad, in­clud­ing the last few years be­fore Eman­ci­pa­tion; the peo­ple who may have fea­tured in those im­ages, and who lived and worked on his es­tate in Arou­ca; and the con­di­tions un­der which they lived.

This isn't your first bi­og­ra­phy; you're al­so the au­thor of bios of fash­ion de­sign­er Meil­ing and jew­eller Bar­bara Jar­dine. I'm sure there are mas­sive dif­fer­ences be­tween writ­ing on the liv­ing and writ­ing on the dead; which do you pre­fer? Or, if you wish, what are the up­side and the down­side of writ­ing about a dead sub­ject?

This is more than a bi­og­ra­phy, but the bi­o­graph­i­cal sec­tions were in some ways the most dif­fi­cult. Al­though Brid­gens mixed with some of the best ar­chi­tects, artists and writ­ers of his time–peo­ple in Lord By­ron's cir­cle, for in­stance–he wasn't con­sid­ered their so­cial equal, so he bare­ly fea­tures in what's writ­ten about them. And his per­son­al pa­pers were de­stroyed in a fire in Port-of-Spain, so there are frus­trat­ing gaps in the sto­ry, though I still found out things no one else has known about him till now. Ob­vi­ous­ly with a liv­ing sub­ject, you can just ask what they've done and why, etc.

But writ­ing about liv­ing peo­ple has its own com­pli­ca­tions. For in­stance, an in­tu­itive artist may give you one ac­count of their work–but when you look at it, you see some­thing else. It can feel quite im­per­ti­nent to say an artist's in­ter­pre­ta­tion of his or her own work is in­ac­cu­rate.

Brid­gens' roles (both in his of­fi­cial ca­pac­i­ty and his un­of­fi­cial ca­pac­i­ty as an artist) have been sig­nif­i­cant. Can you speak to the two faces of his lega­cy?

Brid­gens be­came huge­ly in­flu­en­tial in the UK: he pub­lished a book of fur­ni­ture pat­terns used by fur­ni­ture-mak­ers for the rest of the 19th cen­tu­ry. He worked on the grand hous­es of peo­ple like the celebri­ty nov­el­ist Sir Wal­ter Scott; the in­dus­tri­al­ist James Watt, son of the great en­gi­neer; and the re­mark­able pre­fab­ri­cat­ed house shipped to St He­le­na for Napoleon when he was ex­iled af­ter Wa­ter­loo.

He was the Su­per­in­ten­dent of Pub­lic Works here: the bot­tom had dropped out of the sug­ar econ­o­my and he need­ed the in­come–he and his wife Maria had six chil­dren. So in­ter alia he de­signed the Red House, al­though his ver­sion wasn't fin­ished in his life­time, be­cause the Trea­sury ran out of cash.He al­so pub­lished a book of draw­ings, West In­dia Scenery, which fo­cus­es on sug­ar cul­ti­va­tion and the en­slaved peo­ple on the es­tates.

The few art his­to­ri­ans who men­tion his pic­tures have dis­missed them as racist car­i­ca­ture, but they're con­stant­ly used nowa­days in books, films and ex­hi­bi­tions on Caribbean and even Amer­i­can slav­ery–though rarely cred­it­ed to Brid­gens.

I think they're crit­i­cised part­ly be­cause he wasn't very good at draw­ing peo­ple (in­clud­ing Eu­ro­peans). But they're huge­ly use­ful for what they show about the con­di­tions of slav­ery. De­spite be­ing a slave­hold­er him­self, he was enough of an artist and had enough in­tegri­ty to try to draw what he saw with­out white­wash­ing it.

What was the most sur­pris­ing as­pect of the work you un­der­took to com­plete this book? What was the most dis­turb­ing?

The most sur­pris­ing thing was how much it's pos­si­ble to find out about in­di­vid­ual en­slaved peo­ple through of­fi­cial records such as the reg­is­ter of slaves and the re­ports of the Pro­tec­tor of Slaves: their names, ages, height, eth­nic ori­gin, oc­cu­pa­tions, fam­i­lies can be traced over the years.

There's al­so am­ple in­for­ma­tion about how they were treat­ed in the Pro­tec­tor's re­ports. They make clear how en­slaved peo­ple re­sist­ed in all sorts of ways, de­spite know­ing the most vi­cious pun­ish­ments would fol­low.

Those re­ports were the most dis­turb­ing thing–like Brid­gens's draw­ings of peo­ple wear­ing iron col­lars, or the masks used as pun­ish­ment for dirt-eat­ing (that could cause phys­i­cal ill­ness or death and was prob­a­bly a psy­cho­log­i­cal re­ac­tion to en­slave­ment, but the planters just treat­ed it as bad be­hav­ior).

The Pro­tec­tor's re­ports and those of the UK An­ti-Slav­ery So­ci­ety dis­prove the no­tion that slav­ery in Trinidad was less bad than else­where in the re­gion.

This re­search has tak­en a long time. How long ex­act­ly, in­volv­ing what hoops of fire through which you had to jump, and where–emo­tion­al­ly, phys­i­cal­ly, ge­o­graph­i­cal­ly–did it take you?

It's been about six years–too long, but I ran in­to some brick walls in find­ing in­for­ma­tion about Brid­gens. Al­so, I re­alised it need­ed to be about the peo­ple of the St Clair es­tate and slav­ery in Trinidad too, be­cause there aren't many de­tailed ac­counts of what it was like. So I need­ed to know every­thing about the 19th cen­tu­ry!

Un­for­tu­nate­ly, when I re­alised that, I'd just agreed to be ed­i­tor in chief of the T&T Guardian, which didn't leave much time for oth­er things.

Then the UK na­tion­al archives in­creased the price of copies of records, so the re­main­ing Pro­tec­tor's re­ports would have cost �13,000 in­stead of the pre­vi­ous �40. They said it would be cheap­er to come and copy them my­self. That was a ma­jor set­back, but then I had the huge good luck to get a small re­search grant. In the archives in Lon­don and Birm­ing­ham, I saw let­ters and draw­ings by Brid­gens, and the orig­i­nal, hand­writ­ten Pro­tec­tor's re­ports–which in­clude the "Xs" signed by en­slaved wit­ness­es who couldn't write. That was very mov­ing, though read­ing the re­ports in gen­er­al is very dis­tress­ing.

As well as the site that was once the St Clair es­tate and oth­er lo­cal sites linked to Brid­gens, I al­so got to vis­it As­ton Hall, the Ja­cobean home in Birm­ing­ham bril­liant­ly re­stored by Brid­gens and its own­er.

Now that the book is done and about to be of­fi­cial­ly launched, what's next for you?

There are oth­er as­pects of and char­ac­ters in lo­cal his­to­ry I'd like to write about, in­clud­ing a true, amaz­ing sto­ry in­volv­ing a very fa­mous writer–but which I want to write as fic­tion.

I'm al­so work­ing on a short mem­oir of my grand­fa­ther Arthur Ray­mond. He came from the East Dry Riv­er and had a dif­fi­cult per­son­al life–and he was al­so the jour­nal­ist who wrote the ed­i­to­r­i­al that led to the Privy Coun­cil's Am­bard judge­ment, a fa­mous vic­to­ry for press free­dom.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored