Ryan Hadeed
Whenever I travel to the States, I spend a fair amount of the time praying the Rosary. While it's always been a very calming practice, I never once thought that my possession of such a religious article would end up being a cause of confusion. In the eighteen months following the events of September 11, 2001, every time I entered the US, I was pulled aside by immigration for a secondary inspection. During one of those backroom interviews, I was asked to empty the contents of my pockets, out of which I produced the collection of beads and its attached crucifix. The officer picked them up for a closer examination; I still remember the perplexed look on his face. After a moment, he looked up at me and, in a sheepish tone, declared, "My God, you're Catholic." I imagine that he was unable to fathom how a person with an Arab surname wasn't a Muslim.
As the world's population continues to grow, its size, in contrast, has begun to metaphorically shrink. Immigrants and their children are altering the racial, cultural, and religious make-up of countries and their local communities. But not everyone is happy with living in this new 'global village', especially if your neighbour is brown, bearded, and refers to God as Allah. Islamophobia has been on the rise since that tragic morning in September, 15 years ago. And the frequency of terrorist activities committed by Muslims means that the negative sentiment is only going to get worse.
Non-Muslims should always be encouraged to exercise tolerance and understanding. But the standard defence of denying the 'perpetrators as true Muslims' or stating that 'this is not Islam' is no longer convincing. This may be part of the reason for the absence of worldwide outpouring over the massacres in Istanbul, Baghdad and Saudi Arabia as opposed to the response that Paris, Brussels and Orlando received. The backlash has gone beyond hate crimes and prejudice and is now one of apathy and indifference ie, 'If they want to kill each other, let them go right ahead, as long as they leave the rest of us alone.' The unfortunate truth is that Muslims, regardless of how friendly or moderate they may appear, are still looked upon with suspicion.
The attacks that have taken place in the heart of the Islamic world during the closing days of Ramadan have shown that even fellow Muslims will not be spared from the slaughter. Perhaps this is the watershed moment that will serve as the impetus for a frank and open dialogue on the nature of the religion, confronting the bad as well as the good. The question most often asked by non-Muslims is whether Islam is a religion that promotes violence. But addressing it mustn't become a medium for assigning blame, as all the adherents of the faith shouldn't be held accountable for the actions of a few extremists. That being said, there may be a distinction between belief and practice, meaning that even if the numbers of the latter are minuscule, those of the fore might be numerous.
Instead of analysing the individuals responsible for these acts of mass murder, their mental state or socio-economic background, let's look at the radical groups whose ideology appeals to them. Be it ISIL, Al-Qaeda, Boko Haram, or Hamas, they all cite verses from the Q'uran and Hadiths to validate and rationalise their actions. Are the violent teachings they contain any different to those found in the Jewish Torah or the Christian Bible? No. But even the small parts that are violent can overshadow everything else. Keep in mind, too, that those being called terrorists see themselves as performing an act of jihad in Allah's name. And that's the lens through which non-Muslims view Islam.
There's a Muslim reformist named Irshad Manji, who suggests in her book, The Trouble With Islam Today, that the problem isn't their religion, but Muslims themselves–those who focus solely on its violent teachings and the majority who fail to speak up in protest. The silence is misconstrued by non-Muslims as tacit approval. Ms Manji is an intriguing personality not only because of her provocative opinion but for what she represents�the new voice of Islam that's struggling to be heard. She's young, western raised and educated, progressive in her thinking, and a lesbian; the complete antithesis to the traditional bearded old Mufti preaching orthodoxy. In order to counter extremism and the resulting Islamophobia, she advocates that a new generation of Muslims need to be equipped with the self-confidence to recognise that they can think for themselves instead of blindly submitting. And to not only denounce but reject the elements that are outdated and incompatible with the modern world. So Muslims should never be expected to apologise or defend their faith, but they need to usher in their own religious renaissance�to engage in an honest conversation that seeks to identify the 'whys' and offer meaningful solutions.
When deciding to write on this topic, I have to admit feeling a sense of trepidation, which is ironic considering that I wouldn't have thought twice about critically discussing Catholicism. So I am guilty of harbouring the same fear of which I myself experienced first-hand. Some will be angered by this perspective, and that's fine, but I shouldn't be afraid to present it. After all, the Rosary in my back pocket isn't a bulletproof vest.