JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, May 19, 2025

The death of smelter is a done deal

by

20161113

WAYNE KUBLALS­INGH

The fol­low­ing brief points will hope­ful­ly res­cue the alu­mini­um smelter is­sue from its cur­rent quandary of par­ti­san fren­zy.

�2 In 2004, one hero of the Re­pub­lic, Yvonne Ash­by, a life­long nurse and great grand­daugh­ter of a free­man slave, stood up in Chatham and de­clared No Smelter! Take your filthy pot of lu­cre and go! She was at­tack­ing the bu­reau­crats of the Na­tion­al En­er­gy Cor­po­ra­tion, the Gov­ern­ment and for­eign AL­COA lob­by­ists, on health, eco­nom­ic and eco­log­i­cal grounds. She be­came the ide­o­log­i­cal cen­tre of the No Smelter Move­ment.

�2 Af­ter vo­cif­er­ous protests from the cit­i­zens of Chatham, Ce­dros, ac­tivists from the ur­ban North, the work of Pro­fes­sor Ju­lian Ken­ny, Dr Raphael Se­bas­t­ian, and oth­ers, cre­at­ing hell for the pro-smelter lob­by; es­tab­lish­ing camps at Chatham, UWI, AL­COA with­drew in De­cem­ber 2008. Min­utes from one AL­COA meet­ing re­veal they feared the hos­til­i­ty of the cit­i­zens; and a glob­al re­ces­sion was on the rise.

�2 The Gov­ern­ment was left with Alutrint, the Alu­minum smelter in La Brea. But this too was at­tacked. Cit­i­zens Gour and Carter and a host of res­i­dent ac­tivists. No­body be­lieved that this smelter could be de­con­struct­ed. The Chi­nese had al­ready ar­rived to build, set­ting up a hous­ing com­plex, bring­ing in equip­ment; and work on the port was al­most com­plet­ed; a si­lo foun­da­tion was al­most com­plet­ed. But Jus­tice Mi­ra Dean-Ar­mor­er struck down smelter by quash­ing the Cer­tifi­cate of En­vi­ron­men­tal Clear­ance for it project in June 2009.

�2 Mr Man­ning lost pow­er in 2010; the PP Gov­ern­ment was per­suad­ed, by var­i­ous in­ter­ven­tions; as well as a land­mark News­day ed­i­to­r­i­al, to stop the si­lo. Why build a si­lo, a bin to col­lect im­port­ed alu­mi­na, if the project had no smelter? The project was left with one thou­sand acres of cleared for­est; a good port; and the gas-fed pow­er plant would go ahead. Smelter was squashed. Not by the PP gov­ern­ment, but the court–the work of ac­tivists and coun­sels Fyard Ho­sein, Ramesh L Ma­haraj, Ra­jen­dra Ram­lo­gan, Rishi Dass, Ma­ri­na Nar­i­nesingh.

�2 The Gov­ern­ment ap­pealed the de­ci­sion of Jus­tice Mi­ra-Dean Ar­mor­er. An ap­peal court met un­der Chief Jus­tice Archie; they have not yet, since 2010, de­liv­ered a judge­ment. The Ar­mor­er de­ci­sion hinged on the ques­tion of lack of an ad­e­quate pub­lic con­sul­ta­tion; and the fail­ure to find prop­er dis­pos­al for one tox­ic by-prod­uct of alu­mini­um smelt­ing, Spent Pot Lin­ing.

�2 Since the Ar­mor­er de­ci­sion (2009) both the Man­ning Gov­ern­ment and the PP gov­ern­ment have been whis­per­ing breath in­to the nos­trils of smelter. A Wik­ileaks ca­ble has re­vealed that Mr Man­ning had been at­tempt­ing via his For­eign Min­is­ter, to find a con­tact, a path­way through diplo­mat­ic chan­nels in the US, for the dis­pos­al of Spent Pot Lin­ing. Did the PP Gov­ern­ment not know that for­mer Alutrint per­son­nel were still em­ployed in the smelter un­der­tak­ing; in the face of a high court de­ci­sion, well in­to its term?

�2 The Row­ley Gov­ern­ment is now is se­ri­ous fi­nan­cial dif­fi­cul­ty over smelter. The Chi­nese are mak­ing a case for fat com­pen­sa­tion. They did not ter­mi­nate the con­tract; nor the Gov­ern­ment; it was the courts. The Gov­ern­ment has in­di­cat­ed that it wants to pur­sue the im­por­ta­tion of alu­mini­um in­gots to build a down­stream alu­mini­um pro­cess­ing fa­cil­i­ty: Alutech.

The Gov­ern­ments in the past would not lis­ten. Not to Ms Ash­by, the ac­tivist, good eco­nom­ics, sci­ence. As with the Debe to Mon De­sir high­way, whose coun­ter­part in this strug­gle (start­ing 2004 as well) was Mr Bal­li­ram Siew of Pe­nal, the fail­ure of process, to heed the in­tel­li­gentsia on the ground, has led to gross col­lapse, waste, par­ti­san furore.

They pre­ferred to be guid­ed by the syco­phan­tic state oli­garchs, the well-paid con­sul­tants, ra­bid con­trac­tors, the en­gi­neer­ing fat­cat hood, bo­gus sci­ence and eco­nom­ics. Over one bil­lion TT$ has gone down the drain. Per­haps more.

The so­lu­tion

No­body but the fat­cats above want a high­way be­tween Debe to Mon De­sir. Build a con­nec­tor at the lev­el of the ex­ist­ing streets, con­nect­ing the net, from the Debe In­ter­change to Pe­nal, San Fran­cique Road, Siparia North. Sell all those ac­quired prop­er­ties from Pe­nal to Mon De­sir and re­coup gov­ern­ment debt. And is Alutech eco­nom­ic?

The Chi­nese might make it so. If the Chi­nese wants, sell them our debt by leas­ing them part of Alutech. Let the "bleed" oc­cur in­cre­men­tal­ly. At least we shall be able to get some jobs, em­ploy­ment, from this di­ver­si­fi­er.

No smelter

No alu­mini­um smelter in T&T can oc­cur. The mat­ter is buried deep in court; and if picked up, it would re­quire years for re-cer­ti­fi­ca­tion. Be­sides it is un­eco­nom­ic; T&T can­not any longer be com­pet­i­tive in the glob­al oil and gas mar­kets.The death of smelter is a done deal. No gov­ern­ment, un­less sui­ci­dal, would go for it. It is clad in the iron cof­fin of his­to­ry. Alutrint would have been ad­van­ta­geous to the Chi­nese, a buss for us.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored