JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, July 9, 2025

UN body monitors La Brea fish kill

by

20140408

The Unit­ed Na­tions En­vi­ron­ment Pro­gramme (UN­EP), an in­ter­na­tion­al en­vi­ron­ment watch­dog, says it is mon­i­tor­ing with con­cern the fish kills that have been wash­ing ashore at La Brea.Christo­pher Corbin, UN­EP Caribbean Re­gion­al Co-or­di­nat­ing Unit, Caribbean En­vi­ron­ment Pro­gramme CEP, and As­sess­ment and Man­age­ment of En­vi­ron­men­tal Pol­lu­tion (AMEP) pro­gramme of­fi­cer, con­firmed in an e-mail to the T&T Guardian that the agency was keep­ing watch over the fish kills.

Three weeks ago, dead fish be­gan wash­ing ashore at Cof­fee, Point Sable and Sta­tion Beach­es, all of which were heav­i­ly af­fect­ed by the De­cem­ber 17 Petrotrin oil spill.

Fish­er­man and Friends of the Sea sec­re­tary Gary Aboud has at­trib­uted the death of the fish to Petrotrin's use of the con­tro­ver­sial dis­per­sant Corex­it A9500 dur­ing the ini­tial days of the clean-up. How­ev­er, the En­vi­ron­men­tal Man­age­ment Au­thor­i­ty (EMA) has since said the pre­lim­i­nary re­port in­to the fish kill had re­vealed that the dis­per­sant was not re­spon­si­ble for the fish deaths.

Corbin, in the e-mail, said: "As a con­tract­ing par­ty to the Carta­ge­na Con­ven­tion and in par­tic­u­lar the Oil Spills Pro­to­col, we (UN­EP/CEP) have been mon­i­tor­ing the sit­u­a­tion and are of course quite con­cerned with the im­pacts be­ing ex­pe­ri­enced, as re­port­ed in the na­tion­al me­dia in­clud­ing po­ten­tial im­pacts on liveli­hoods (fish­er­men), hu­man health and now through fish kills."

The Carta­ge­na Con­ven­tion, ac­cord­ing to the UN­EP/CEP Web site, "is a com­pre­hen­sive, um­brel­la agree­ment for the pro­tec­tion and de­vel­op­ment of the ma­rine en­vi­ron­ment."Corbin, who is al­so at­tached to the sec­re­tari­at of the Carta­ge­na Con­ven­tion, ad­mit­ted that since the De­cem­ber oil spill and its im­pacts were es­sen­tial­ly in ter­ri­to­r­i­al wa­ters, the sec­re­tari­at could take no fur­ther ac­tion, "un­less it re­ceives a spe­cif­ic re­quest for some form of tech­ni­cal as­sis­tance from our na­tion­al fo­cal point–the Min­istry of En­vi­ron­ment."

He said the sec­re­tari­at would on­ly be ac­ti­vat­ed when the im­pacts were felt in neigh­bour­ing coun­tries and thus be­came a trans­bound­ary is­sue, so that "spe­cif­ic pro­vi­sions of the con­ven­tion and the Oil Spills Pro­to­col will come in­to play re­quir­ing shar­ing of more spe­cif­ic in­for­ma­tion on the spill and the im­pacts."

He said the In­sti­tute of Ma­rine Af­fairs was recog­nised as one of UN­EP/CEP's spe­cialised agen­cies or re­gion­al ac­tiv­i­ty cen­tres for land-based sources of ma­rine pol­lu­tion, and would have the nec­es­sary ca­pac­i­ty to do an as­sess­ment of the sit­u­a­tion and pos­si­ble risks, such as those from the fish kills.

Corbin said while UN­EP/CEP had not been for­mal­ly ap­proached by the T&T Gov­ern­ment for as­sis­tance, in col­lab­o­ra­tion with its UN­EP/In­ter­na­tion­al Mar­itime Or­gan­i­sa­tion (IMO) joint Re­gion­al Ac­tiv­i­ty Cen­tre for the Oil Spills Pro­to­col-based in Cu­ra­cao, it has pro­vid­ed rec­om­men­da­tions on ex­perts who could as­sist in the as­sess­ment process.

"This was based on an ap­proach by the Gov­ern­ment to the Re­gion­al Ma­rine Pol­lu­tion Emer­gency In­for­ma­tion and Train­ing Cen­tre for the Wider Caribbean (REM­PEITC-Caribe) Re­gion­al Ac­tiv­i­ty Cen­tre (RAC)," he said.Corbin said he was not cer­tain if a di­rect re­quest was made from Gov­ern­ment or through the UN frame­work, the UNDP na­tion­al of­fice in Trinidad, or the IMO Caribbean ad­vis­er based in Trinidad.

Res­i­dent com­plains

Cof­fee Beach res­i­dent Oneca Branker-Show­ers, speak­ing with the T&T Guardian, said dead fish were still wash­ing ashore, in­clud­ing more species, such as cat­fish and moon­shine.Branker-Show­ers said res­i­dents were still en­dur­ing the stench of rot­ting fish along the shore­line at Cof­fee beach and rash­es have bro­ken out on her five-year-old nephew's skin and an­oth­er woman and her six-year-old son.

She lament­ed that no one seemed to care about the res­i­dents along the shore­line, be­cause no one had cleaned up the dead fish."We do not have a choice here. We have to take it and live with it. We have to eat as nor­mal. No one here will go and clean that. Who go­ing to go clos­er to that to in­hale that? No­body want to go there, they afraid to touch," she lament­ed."It's very hard for us. We do not know what is go­ing on, no one telling us any­thing."


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored