JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, August 14, 2025

Probe hears Teshiera promised $71m bailout

by

20120709

For­mer fi­nance min­is­ter, Karen Nunez-Tesheira, promised a $71 mil­lion bailout of the Hin­du Cred­it Union (HCU) and to ful­ly as­sist the in­sti­tu­tion but the plan fell through, the Cli­co/HCU com­mis­sion of en­quiry heard yes­ter­day.

The bailout would have come in the form of the gov­ern­ment's pur­chase of two of the HCU's Ch­agua­nas prop­er­ties. Mak­ing the dis­clo­sure was Vish­nu Dhan­paul, al­ter­nate ex­ec­u­tive di­rec­tor of the World Bank and Per­ma­nent Sec­re­tary in the Min­istry of Fi­nance. Dhan­paul was al­so per­ma­nent sec­re­tary in the min­istry of fi­nance in 1987. Tes­ti­fy­ing in the en­quiry at the Win­sure Build­ing on Rich­mond Street, Port-of-Spain, yes­ter­day, Dhan­paul said HCU pres­i­dent, Har­ry Harnar­ine, re­quest­ed the $71 mil­lion from the fi­nance min­istry when the cred­it union col­lapsed.\

On April 17, 2008, the min­is­ter held a meet­ing with Harnar­ine and oth­er rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the HCU, Dhan­paul said. He was present at the meet­ing, he said. Dhan­paul said there was no agree­ment by the gov­ern­ment to pur­chase the prop­er­ties be­cause every piece of HCU re­al es­tate was un­debt­ed. He said the find­ings were made af­ter a le­gal team was ap­point­ed by the min­istry to con­duct search­es of two of the HCU's prop­er­ties at Ch­agua­nas which were of­fered for sale to the Gov­ern­ment. "The min­is­ter told me that Har­ry was be­ing less than truth­ful," he said. Harnar­ine's at­tor­ney, Fa­reed Schoon, asked: "The min­is­ter promised to help and re­neged on the promise?" Dhan­paul dis­agreed.

He said it was the HCU that came to the min­istry ask­ing that a line of cred­it be ex­tend­ed to the cred­it union. "The min­istry does not ex­tend lines of cred­it to pri­vate en­ti­ties. It makes no sense," he said. Asked if the min­istry had ex­tend­ed help to the HCU it would have halt­ed its fi­nan­cial run and pro­vid­ed the im­pe­tus it need­ed to re­vive, Dhan­paul said he had no idea. He agreed, how­ev­er, that the min­istry had en­tered in­to ne­go­ti­a­tions with the HCU to find out how it could as­sist. The min­is­ter had cer­tain con­di­tions the HCU must ful­fil in or­der to get help, Dhan­paul said. Con­di­tions in­clud­ed car­ry­ing out an in­de­pen­dent au­dit and send­ing all in­debt­ed prop­er­ties to the min­istry, he said. Dhan­paul agreed with Scoon it was the min­istry of labour and not the min­istry of fi­nance that had over­sight of the op­er­a­tions of cred­it unions. How­ev­er, any­thing that had a con­ta­gion ef­fect on the econ­o­my was of con­cern to the fi­nance min­istry, he rea­soned. Af­ter the Ernst & Young au­dit, the min­istry con­clud­ed that the HCU was in­sol­vent and dis­cus­sions with the cred­it union were ter­mi­nat­ed, Dhan­paul said.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored