JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, July 30, 2025

Between a rock and a hard place

by

Mariano Browne
409 days ago
20240616
 Mariano Browne

Mariano Browne

Nicole Drayton

Last week we ex­am­ined the IMF Ar­ti­cle IV con­sul­ta­tion re­port and its growth pro­jec­tion for the lo­cal econ­o­my. We not­ed that the growth in the three years 2021-23 was due large­ly to a price ef­fect. The prices of nat­ur­al gas and petro­chem­i­cal ex­ports rose be­cause of the war in Ukraine and a post-COVID lock­down surge in de­mand even though pro­duc­tion de­clined. We con­trast­ed the op­ti­mism of the IMF re­port with its warn­ing … “The bal­ance of risks is tilt­ed to the down­side.”

We com­ment­ed on the Fi­nance Min­is­ter’s af­fi­davit re­gard­ing the Civ­il Ap­peal CA P351 of 2023 (Ter­risa Dho­ray and the AG and the TTRA) not­ing that it pro­vid­ed a re­al­is­tic as­sess­ment of T&T’s vul­ner­a­bil­i­ty in its con­tin­ued de­pen­dence on the en­er­gy sec­tor. The min­is­ter al­so in­di­cat­ed that the prospects for im­prov­ing tax rev­enues for the next three years were bleak with­out the TTRA be­cause the ex­ist­ing tax ad­min­is­tra­tion process­es were weak. His ar­gu­ment is re­al­is­tic be­cause the ben­e­fit of any pol­i­cy change needs three to five years to have an im­pact.

The IMF projects con­tin­ued deficits as the Gov­ern­ment’s ex­pen­di­ture will in­crease nat­u­ral­ly in line with in­fla­tion and salary ad­just­ments over the next three years as tax rev­enues are like­ly to de­cline with weak­er gas pro­duc­tion.

Bud­get deficits are fi­nanced by bor­row­ing. In ad­di­tion, gov­ern­ments will al­ways need to bor­row be­cause there are tim­ing dif­fer­ences be­tween tax re­ceipts and ex­pen­di­tures. Larg­er deficits in­crease the bor­row­ing re­quire­ment. The pro­ject­ed rev­enue short­fall not­ed by the Fi­nance Min­is­ter in his af­fi­davit leaves him in a quandary.

He states that T&T on­ly “achieved a bud­get sur­plus once in the last 15 years, in 2022 due to an in­crease in oil and gas price caused by the war in Ukraine.” (para 20)

In para­graph 27 he ac­knowl­edges the im­por­tance of in­ter­na­tion­al rat­ing agen­cies not­ing “… in­ter­na­tion­al rat­ing agen­cies have warned that if the Gov­ern­ment is not able to achieve fis­cal con­sol­i­da­tion in the near fu­ture the coun­try’s in­ter­na­tion­al cred­it rat­ing will be down­grad­ed.”

The com­ment is sig­nif­i­cant. By grad­ing a coun­try’s cred­it­wor­thi­ness, rat­ing agen­cies in­flu­ence the ap­petite of in­ter­na­tion­al in­vestors for a coun­try’s fi­nan­cial in­stru­ments (bonds) and the pric­ing of those in­stru­ments. The low­er the cred­it rat­ing, the high­er the in­ter­est rate. This in­creas­es bor­row­ing costs and debt ser­vice to the is­su­ing coun­try. The Fi­nance Min­is­ter says this very elo­quent­ly in para 28. “These rat­ings are im­por­tant … in that they im­pact the State’s ac­cess to for­eign cur­ren­cy, in­flu­ence the cost of gov­ern­ment bor­row­ing and in­form the per­cep­tions of in­vestors and de­vel­op­ment banks.”

There are three ma­jor rat­ing agen­cies; Fitch Rat­ings (Fitch), Moody’s In­vestor Ser­vices (Moody’s), and Stan­dard and Poor (S&P). Fitch and Moody’s cur­rent­ly rate T&T’s in­ter­na­tion­al bond at a notch be­low in­vest­ment grade, while S&P rates T&T as BBB-/Sta­ble/A3, a bor­der­line in­vest­ment grade (para 32). On Fri­day, June 14, Moody’s ad­just­ed the out­look slight­ly, from “pos­i­tive” to “sta­ble”.

S&P is the largest of the three rat­ing agen­cies. Its 2023 re­port/eval­u­a­tion of TT warned it could change its rat­ings if GDP per capi­ta does not re­cov­er in line with S&P’s fore­cast ex­pec­ta­tions, or the Gov­ern­ment debt/bud­get deficits are ma­te­ri­al­ly slow­er than an­tic­i­pat­ed. In short, T&T is on the edge of a rat­ings’ precipice. S&P’s next rat­ing eval­u­a­tion is due in Ju­ly 2024. The fear of a “low­er qual­i­ty rat­ing” as­so­ci­at­ed with a high­er risk of de­fault has caused the ur­gency to im­ple­ment the prop­er­ty tax and the TTRA.

Some may dis­miss this ex­pla­na­tion as an ex­ag­ger­a­tion. It is worth point­ing out that the most plau­si­ble rea­son for the abrupt clo­sure of the Petrotrin re­fin­ery was the fear of hav­ing to ac­cept re­spon­si­bil­i­ty for Petrotrin’s US dol­lar debt oblig­a­tions which amount­ed to rough­ly US$1 bil­lion-plus. Clos­ing the loss-mak­ing re­fin­ery put a cap on the debt and al­lowed the new­ly cre­at­ed Her­itage to gen­er­ate enough cash to re­pay the USD oblig­a­tions of the hold­ing com­pa­ny. As a re­sult, the Gov­ern­ment avoid­ed re­spon­si­bil­i­ty for these debts.

The Au­di­tor Gen­er­al’s au­dit dis­claimer on the 2023 Pub­lic Ac­counts would have been dis­turb­ing as it ques­tioned the ac­cu­ra­cy of the rev­enue re­port­ing and the size of the deficit.

In fair­ness, the min­is­ter has been dealt a dif­fi­cult hand. He con­trols nei­ther in­ter­na­tion­al prices nor nat­ur­al gas pro­duc­tion which have both de­clined. How­ev­er, over­play­ing the theme of “pru­dent fis­cal man­age­ment” when the coun­try ben­e­fit­ed from favourable in­ter­na­tion­al gas and petro­chem­i­cal prices has ex­posed the min­is­ter. The gam­ble that gas and petro­chem­i­cal prices would re­main buoy­ant and fa­cil­i­tate the ex­pen­di­ture pro­file has not ma­te­ri­alised. The down­side risks iden­ti­fied by the IMF in its re­port are in­con­ve­nient facts, not risks.

To sur­mount the fis­cal chal­lenges, the econ­o­my must grow, there­by in­creas­ing GDP and tax­able in­comes. This is not a short-term ex­er­cise. T&T is a small coun­try. To suc­ceed, poli­cies must be ap­plied con­sis­tent­ly, re­gard­less of which par­ty forms the ad­min­is­tra­tion.

Man­ag­ing the econ­o­my is a col­lab­o­ra­tive ex­er­cise be­tween the Gov­ern­ment and the pri­vate sec­tor (busi­ness­es and house­hold­ers) as the pri­vate sec­tor gen­er­ates wealth, not gov­ern­ments. But with­out sen­si­ble, well-im­ple­ment­ed poli­cies by the Gov­ern­ment, the pri­vate sec­tor will strug­gle. The neg­a­tive plat­form rhetoric and un­sta­ble crime sit­u­a­tion are draw­backs. A coun­try grows when there is the rule of law, peace, sta­bil­i­ty, and or­der.

Mar­i­ano Browne is the Chief Ex­ec­u­tive Of­fi­cer of the UWI Arthur Lok Jack Glob­al School of Busi­ness.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored