JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, July 7, 2025

Economists: UNC Economic Plan questionable and unlikely

by

Kyron Regis
1803 days ago
20200729

Two econ­o­mists have called the UNC’s pro­posed plans for the fis­cal man­age­ment of the na­tion ques­tion­able and im­prob­a­ble.

In an in­ter­view with the Busi­ness Guardian, To­bag­on­ian Dr Vanus James said: “The over­all promise of a bal­anced bud­get over 2020-2025 is not like­ly to be fea­si­ble in the con­text of a de­pressed econ­o­my post-COVID and in the con­text of a promised re­duc­tion of var­i­ous tax rates (in­di­vid­ual and cor­po­rate, and con­sump­tion).”

In the Debt Con­sol­i­da­tion and Man­age­ment Strat­e­gy sec­tion of the UNC’s Na­tion­al Eco­nom­ic Trans­for­ma­tion Mas­ter­plan 2025, the par­ty stat­ed its in­ten­tion run a bal­anced bud­get over the 2020-2025 pe­ri­od and to es­tab­lish the debt to GDP ra­tio at 60 per cent by 2025.

How­ev­er, in an­oth­er part of the Mas­ter­plan, the UNC in­di­cat­ed that it would re­move and re­duce a vast ar­ray of tax­es.

The par­ty in­di­cat­ed that a new UNC Gov­ern­ment would strength­en, re-en­gi­neer and trans­form the Board of In­land Rev­enue (BIR), the VAT Of­fice and Cus­toms and Ex­cise.

It ex­plained that this in­sti­tu­tion­al strength­en­ing is im­por­tant to im­prove rev­enue col­lec­tion and ad­dress weak­ness­es in tax ad­min­is­tra­tion and com­pli­ance.

The par­ty added that it would scrap the pro­posed rev­enue au­thor­i­ty, dis­miss the con­tro­ver­sial prop­er­ty tax, re­duce per­son­al in­come tax­es (PAYE), de­crease cor­po­ra­tion tax­es and re­move VAT on over 7,000 items.

The UNC plan in­di­cat­ed that gov­ern­ment has sti­fled busi­ness­es and crip­pled their cash­flow through non-pay­ment of VAT re­funds.

How­ev­er, James dis­closed that tax­es on con­sump­tion would tend to be high­ly re­gres­sive (tak­ing a larg­er per­cent­age of in­come from low-in­come earn­ers than from high-in­come earn­ers) and that would be­come an is­sue when the time comes to im­ple­ment a shift to such tax­es.

James con­tin­ued to high­light in­con­sis­ten­cies, not­ing: “This par­ty (UNC) has long op­posed the prop­er­ty tax but still em­braces land and build­ing tax. There seems to be some need to clar­i­fy this stance, since land and build­ings qual­i­fy as most of what is called prop­er­ty un­der the prop­er­ty tax.”

Ac­cord­ing to James, debt sus­tain­abil­i­ty would in­volve more than man­age­ment of pay­ments. He in­di­cat­ed that the key tool in this pro­posed debt man­age­ment strat­e­gy is usu­al­ly to grow the econ­o­my faster than the rate of in­ter­est on the debt.

Fur­ther, James ob­served that the promise is to shape a prop­er debt man­age­ment strat­e­gy and tar­get, but the doc­u­ment has al­ready de­cid­ed that a 60 per cent debt to GDP ra­tio is op­ti­mal.

In the UNC plan it an­nounced that it would “es­tab­lish for­mal fis­cal and debt tar­gets” and com­mu­ni­cate these to the mar­ket and the gen­er­al pub­lic.” It not­ed that it (UNC) in­tends to run a bal­anced bud­get po­si­tion over the 2020 -2025 pe­ri­od and to sta­bi­lize pub­lic debt at about 60 per cent of GDP by 2025.

James said that this is a like­ly con­tra­dic­tion.

Al­so com­ment­ing on the plan was, de­vel­op­ment and eco­nom­ics con­sul­tant Dr In­dera Sage­wan who ex­pressed that, when tak­en at face val­ue - the plan has a good ring to it. She not­ed: “We must recog­nise that the doc­u­ment is for the pur­pose of pub­lic re­la­tions.”

How­ev­er, Sage­wan said, “when you try to drill down” to the de­tails of the plan - it is on­ly then you would be able to de­ter­mine whether the pro­posed strat­e­gy can in fact, be re­alised.

She con­tend­ed: “A lot of the pro­jec­tions be­ing pre­sent­ed through the plan, at this point in time, we can on­ly analyse it at face val­ue, be­cause we do not know what the un­der­ly­ing as­sump­tions and mech­a­nisms are for mak­ing this thing hap­pen.”

With re­gard to hav­ing a bal­anced bud­get, Sage­wan said that the plan where the par­ty would by in­ten­tion­al­ly fore­go­ing cur­rent rev­enues through the tax pro­gramme by cut­ting tax­es and ze­ro rat­ing VAT on all food items - that means the par­ty would will­ing­ly forego the in­come that would nor­mal­ly be pro­duced.

Al­beit, Sage­wan ar­gued that if rev­enue is be­ing will­ing­ly for­gone from cur­rent rev­enue streams while in­creas­ing ex­pen­di­ture through trans­fer pay­ments (men­tioned in var­i­ous parts of the plan) then the on­ly way to ar­rive at a bal­anced bud­get some­where down the line is through in­creas­ing al­ter­na­tive rev­enue streams.

And while the UNC in its plan has pro­posed the non-en­er­gy di­ver­si­fi­ca­tion in its ‘Mas­ter­plan’ as a source of ad­di­tion­al rev­enues, Sage­wan high­light­ed that di­ver­si­fi­ca­tion is not a short-term rev­enue gen­er­at­ing mech­a­nism.

She posit­ed: “You know with any new busi­ness - it takes three to five years be­fore the busi­ness turns a prof­it. So I mean if we’re start­ing the di­ver­si­fi­ca­tion process it re­al­ly begs the ques­tion as to whether in four years time (2025), that gov­ern­ment would be able to be re­al­iz­ing the kinds of tax­es on these new en­deav­ours.”

An­oth­er way that the UNC plan pro­pos­es to raise rev­enue is to in­crease du­ty rates on non-es­sen­tial im­ports. It said: “To com­pen­sate for the re­moval tax on in­come be­low $1 mil­lion, im­port du­ties will be raised. Cer­tain ba­sic food, med­i­cines and es­sen­tial items will be ex­empt from im­port du­ties to en­sure af­ford­abil­i­ty to the poor and most vul­ner­a­ble.”

How­ev­er James ex­pressed con­cern with this propo­si­tion. He said, that T&T is an im­port-de­pen­dent coun­try and there­fore “non-es­sen­tial has a very lim­it­ed mean­ing”. Hence the rea­son James as­sert­ed that ris­ing im­port du­ties tend to be cost in­creas­ing and self-de­feat­ing.

He ex­pressed the pos­si­bil­i­ty that the fuller UNC plan has al­ready con­sid­ered com­ple­ments to this strat­e­gy that take ac­count of the com­pet­i­tive strat­e­gy the coun­try will pur­sue to achieve self-sus­tain­ing growth, in­clud­ing through col­lab­o­ra­tion with­in CARI­COM.

If not, James said that he could fore­see trou­ble when im­ple­ment­ing this pro­pos­al.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored

Today's
Guardian

Publications

The Executive of the National Parang Association 2025-27. Back row, from left: Kervin Preudhomme, assistant secretary; Shaquille Headley, committee member; Cheriese Pierre, committee member; Lisa Lee, trustee; Joanne Briggs, PRO; Yarelis Touissant, committee member; William Calliste, trustee. Front row, from left: Jenais Carter, secretary; Alicia Jaggasar, president; Henrietta Carter, vice president; Joseph Bertrand, youth officer. Missing: Kerrylee Chee Chow, treasurer; Chevone Pierre, committee member.

The Executive of the National Parang Association 2025-27. Back row, from left: Kervin Preudhomme, assistant secretary; Shaquille Headley, committee member; Cheriese Pierre, committee member; Lisa Lee, trustee; Joanne Briggs, PRO; Yarelis Touissant, committee member; William Calliste, trustee. Front row, from left: Jenais Carter, secretary; Alicia Jaggasar, president; Henrietta Carter, vice president; Joseph Bertrand, youth officer. Missing: Kerrylee Chee Chow, treasurer; Chevone Pierre, committee member.

The Executive of the National Parang Association 2025-27. Back row, from left: Kervin Preudhomme, assistant secretary; Shaquille Headley, committee member; Cheriese Pierre, committee member; Lisa Lee, trustee; Joanne Briggs, PRO; Yarelis Touissant, committee member; William Calliste, trustee. Front row, from left: Jenais Carter, secretary; Alicia Jaggasar, president; Henrietta Carter, vice president; Joseph Bertrand, youth officer. Missing: Kerrylee Chee Chow, treasurer; Chevone Pierre, committee member.

The Executive of the National Parang Association 2025-27. Back row, from left: Kervin Preudhomme, assistant secretary; Shaquille Headley, committee member; Cheriese Pierre, committee member; Lisa Lee, trustee; Joanne Briggs, PRO; Yarelis Touissant, committee member; William Calliste, trustee. Front row, from left: Jenais Carter, secretary; Alicia Jaggasar, president; Henrietta Carter, vice president; Joseph Bertrand, youth officer. Missing: Kerrylee Chee Chow, treasurer; Chevone Pierre, committee member.

Jaggasar returns as National Parang president

10 hours ago
Charles Town junior drummers and dancers take to the stage

Charles Town junior drummers and dancers take to the stage

Charles Town junior drummers and dancers take to the stage

Charles Town junior drummers and dancers take to the stage

Jamaican Maroons celebrate, question land rights

10 hours ago
Sherron Harford

Sherron Harford

Sherron Harford

Sherron Harford

Sherron Harford’s holistic mission

to transform the lives of girls

Yesterday
Despite finding out just three days earlier—on December 23—that I had breast cancer, I still got dressed and showed up on December 26, Boxing Day, for a birthday party. I didn’t go to escape the truth. I went to remind myself I was still here, still living, still me.

Despite finding out just three days earlier—on December 23—that I had breast cancer, I still got dressed and showed up on December 26, Boxing Day, for a birthday party. I didn’t go to escape the truth. I went to remind myself I was still here, still living, still me.

Despite finding out just three days earlier—on December 23—that I had breast cancer, I still got dressed and showed up on December 26, Boxing Day, for a birthday party. I didn’t go to escape the truth. I went to remind myself I was still here, still living, still me.

Despite finding out just three days earlier—on December 23—that I had breast cancer, I still got dressed and showed up on December 26, Boxing Day, for a birthday party. I didn’t go to escape the truth. I went to remind myself I was still here, still living, still me.

Nicole Drayton’s breast cancer journey–Fear, faith, and fighting back

Yesterday