JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, July 26, 2025

Force a change of the status quo

by

Garvin Nicholas
2058 days ago
20191207

So­ci­ety can­not change if the sta­tus quo is main­tained. That is a sim­ple but pro­found truth that goes to the heart of so­cial, po­lit­i­cal and de­vel­op­ment the­o­ry.

There have been vary­ing lev­els of so­cial, phys­i­cal and eco­nom­ic de­vel­op­ment of T&T over the last six decades. Com­pared with our less for­tu­nate neigh­bours, we ap­pear to be very "de­vel­oped" as a na­tion and even so, some of our neigh­bours put us to shame. The prob­lem is that we al­ways seem to go af­ter the low­est com­mon de­nom­i­na­tor to make a com­par­i­son. That is a com­mon ploy of failed lead­ers. A clas­sic ex­am­ple was the re­cent state­ment made by the Min­is­ter of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty that he was work­ing on not let­ting our na­tion­al mur­der rate reach the lev­el of Ja­maica or that made by the Min­is­ter of Fi­nance that he saved the na­tion from los­ing free ed­u­ca­tion and health­care by not go­ing to the IMF.

The re­al­i­ty is that, based on the lev­el of oil and gas pro­duc­tion that we have had as a na­tion, we should be com­par­ing our de­vel­op­ment with that of Nor­way and Qatar. By so do­ing, we can then put our progress in­to per­spec­tive.

Cit­i­zens in T&T in 2019, still feel that they are grant­ed favour when on the eve of an elec­tion, they get their roads paved. We con­tin­ue to mark time with road paving pol­i­tics when the de­bate should be evolv­ing to how we make T&T the top five: best places to live; coun­tries to do busi­ness; safest coun­tries; clean­est coun­tries; hap­pi­est coun­tries; most ed­u­cat­ed pop­u­la­tions; low­est ma­ter­nal rates; best pub­lic health­care; most pro­duc­tive agri­cul­tur­al sec­tors; best tourism des­ti­na­tions; most ef­fi­cient pub­lic trans­port sys­tems; green­est and most eq­ui­table so­ci­eties on the plan­et.

We need to be more as­pi­ra­tional but the pol­i­tics have led to a pre­pon­der­ance of hope­less­ness, made man­i­fest by the vary­ing lev­els of vot­er ap­a­thy at both lo­cal and gen­er­al elec­tions.

In­stead of fo­cus­ing on sus­tain­able de­vel­op­ment ob­jec­tives, the Gov­ern­ment of the day is fo­cused on tax­a­tion, try­ing to ex­tract as much mon­ey from the pop­u­la­tion with­out a cor­re­spond­ing in­crease in ser­vice de­liv­ery.

There is al­so an ar­ro­gance that sug­gests that the Gov­ern­ment is en­ti­tled to de­ny cit­i­zens of rights and priv­i­leges on a whim. This be­hav­iour is to­tal­ly at odds with the most fun­da­men­tal ten­ants of democ­ra­cy. It runs afoul of the so­cial con­tract where cit­i­zens on­ly give up rights and priv­i­leges by con­sent, for the gen­er­al good and in­creased se­cu­ri­ty of the na­tion.

Even when poli­cies are meant to ben­e­fit the pop­u­la­tion such as the de­crim­i­nal­i­sa­tion of mar­i­jua­na, it ap­pears to be im­ple­ment­ed in a hap­haz­ard, cyn­i­cal way. While de­crim­i­nal­i­sa­tion will free up the av­er­age cit­i­zen from the in­equitable pros­e­cu­tion for mar­i­jua­na use, it does noth­ing to pre­vent or ease the gang turf war­fare that leads to the na­tion­al in­se­cu­ri­ty we are all sub­ject­ed to. In ad­di­tion, I have heard noth­ing about ed­u­ca­tion and health sup­port that must go hand in hand with such ini­tia­tives.

Laws and poli­cies will al­ways be made to ben­e­fit those who make them, as such, the sta­tus quo of laws and poli­cies will be pre­served un­less there is a fun­da­men­tal dif­fer­ence of in­flu­en­tial thought at the de­ci­sion-mak­ing lev­el. This can­not be overem­pha­sised.

In­flu­en­tial thought is dif­fer­ent from thought. One can be a mem­ber of the de­ci­sion-mak­ing team such as the Cab­i­net but not have the re­quired in­flu­ence, which is usu­al­ly re­served for an in­ner cir­cle of peo­ple sur­round­ing the Prime Min­is­ter.

The pol­i­tics of T&T, which have tra­di­tion­al­ly de­pend­ed on the clear di­vi­sive lines of eth­nic­i­ty and re­li­gion, have be­come more blurred over time. This is be­cause the younger gen­er­a­tions have bro­ken down these tra­di­tion­al bar­ri­ers of com­mu­ni­ca­tion and so­cial in­ter­ac­tions, lead­ing to a larg­er third con­stituen­cy of think­ing. As a re­sult, the tra­di­tion­al par­ties are find­ing it more dif­fi­cult to cap­ture an out­right ma­jor­i­ty of seats. Ex­am­ples of this in­clude 17-17-2; 18-18, which led to an in­crease of seats and even the present con­fig­u­ra­tion of 18-23. Even the lo­cal gov­ern­ment elec­tions have re­sult­ed in a vir­tu­al dead heat of 7-7.

This, I would ar­gue, presents a gen­uine op­por­tu­ni­ty for the third con­stituen­cy to make a re­al im­pact on the na­tion­al agen­da. The think­ing that has emerged from the lo­cal gov­ern­ment elec­tions is that small­er par­ties can fo­cus on re­gion­al con­stituen­cies that com­prise large seg­ments of the third con­stituen­cy thinkers who have tra­di­tion­al­ly not ben­e­fit­ed from the tra­di­tion­al grab for the mar­gin­al seats.

The re­gion of Diego Mar­tin is one such group­ing. It is my be­lief and that of those of us in the MND, that the eth­nic, re­li­gious and so­cioe­co­nom­ic mix that is Diego Mar­tin, al­lows for the blos­som­ing of trans­for­ma­tion­al pol­i­tics that can im­pact not on­ly the res­i­dents of Diego Mar­tin but those of the en­tire coun­try. It is my be­lief that in or­der to get in­flu­en­tial thought at the heart of the de­ci­sion-mak­ing process it must be ac­com­plished by strong coali­tion part­ner­ships.

I en­cour­age small­er par­ties to adopt this strat­e­gy to force a change of the sta­tus quo, whether it is the PPM in Port-of-Spain, the To­ba­go par­ties or the Move­ment for Na­tion­al De­vel­op­ment (MND) in Diego Mar­tin, Trinidad and To­ba­go is wit­ness­ing a qui­et but sig­nif­i­cant po­lit­i­cal rev­o­lu­tion.

Garvin Nicholas is an at­tor­ney and leader of the Move­ment for Na­tion­al De­vel­op­ment.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored