JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, August 14, 2025

From purdah to protest: The unbroken Legacy of India’s Muslim Women

by

Ira Mathur
32 days ago
20250713

“Why do you al­low your­selves to be shut up?”

“Be­cause it can­not be helped, as they are stronger than women.”

“A li­on is stronger than a man, but it does not en­able him to dom­i­nate the hu­man race. You have ne­glect­ed the du­ty you owe to your­selves, and you have lost your nat­ur­al rights by shut­ting your eyes to your own in­ter­ests.”—Sul­tana’s Dream, 1905

In 1905, Rokeya Sakhawat Hos­sain wrote Sul­tana’s Dream, a short sto­ry that imag­ines La­dy­land. In this so­lar-pow­ered, woman-led so­ci­ety, jus­tice is rea­soned, not ruled. Hos­sain wrote it in Eng­lish while liv­ing be­hind pur­dah in colo­nial Ben­gal. More than a hun­dred years lat­er, as Mus­lim women in In­dia face shrink­ing ac­cess to ed­u­ca­tion, hi­jab bans in schools—which are more about deny­ing them choice than grant­i­ng them free­dom—and ris­ing hos­til­i­ty, Sul­tana’s Dream reads less like fan­ta­sy and more like a warn­ing. Si­lence, un­less re­sist­ed, be­comes in­her­i­tance.

Hos­sain was born in 1880 in the vil­lage of Pairabondh near Rang­pur, in what is now Bangladesh. Her fam­i­ly were land­ed aris­to­crats with Per­sian an­ces­try—proud, con­ser­v­a­tive, and steeped in a cul­tur­al or­der where Per­sian and Ara­bic were val­ued, but Ben­gali was con­sid­ered in­ap­pro­pri­ate for elite Mus­lim women. It was the lan­guage of the peas­ants. Girls like Hos­sain were not per­mit­ted to read it. She learned it any­way. Nor was she al­lowed to read or write in Eng­lish, but she did so any­way. Her broth­ers taught her in se­cret. Hos­sain would lat­er use that for­bid­den Eng­lish to pub­lish one of the ear­li­est works of fem­i­nist sci­ence fic­tion and to ar­gue that the veil should nev­er be used to veil in­jus­tice.

In 1911, Hos­sain opened the Sakhawat Memo­r­i­al Girls’ School in Cal­cut­ta with just five stu­dents, armed with noth­ing but her late hus­band’s en­cour­age­ment and her own in­her­it­ed jew­ellery. Cler­ics de­nounced her. Bricks were thrown. How­ev­er, the school sur­vived, and it con­tin­ues to op­er­ate to­day.

Her lit­er­ary work was equal­ly force­ful. In Sul­tana’s Dream, men are con­fined for their own safe­ty while women rule through rea­son and sci­ence. The women grow veg­eta­bles in rooftop gar­dens, gen­er­ate pow­er from the sun, and walk freely through clean streets.

“We shut our men in­doors,” says Sul­tana’s guide, “just as they used to keep us in the zenana. But we do not mere­ly keep them con­fined; we se­cure their good con­duct as well. They do not go about rob­bing and killing... nor are they al­lowed to idle away their time in the streets.”— Sul­tana’s Dream, 1905

In Abar­o­d­hbasi­ni, Hos­sain com­piled ac­cu­rate ac­counts of pur­dah-en­forced suf­fer­ing: women dy­ing in child­birth be­cause no male doc­tor could treat them, girls who nev­er saw day­light. She didn’t dec­o­rate these sto­ries. She record­ed them.

Hos­sain’s in­sis­tence on lit­er­a­cy and vis­i­bil­i­ty came at a time when Mus­lim women were large­ly ex­clud­ed from the sub­con­ti­nent’s re­form move­ments. Hin­du re­form­ers in the Brah­mo and Arya Samaj were push­ing for ed­u­ca­tion and wid­ow re­mar­riage. Mus­lim women re­mained se­questered—cut off not just from pub­lic life, but from their own writ­ten his­to­ries.

The rare ex­cep­tion—like Nawab Sul­tan Ja­han Be­gum of Bhopal, my ma­ter­nal an­ces­tor—was ex­cep­tion­al pre­cise­ly be­cause she ruled. As the last Be­gum of Bhopal, Sul­tan Ja­han re­formed women’s health and ed­u­ca­tion, passed san­i­ta­tion laws, and be­came the first fe­male Chan­cel­lor of Ali­garh Mus­lim Uni­ver­si­ty. Hos­sain, by con­trast, came from the clois­tered quar­ters of a feu­dal house­hold and spoke for women who had no plat­form at all.

Af­ter In­de­pen­dence, Mus­lim per­son­al law was kept out­side In­dia’s civ­il code. The re­sult was para­dox­i­cal: cul­tur­al iden­ti­ty was pre­served, but le­gal re­form—es­pe­cial­ly around di­vorce, in­her­i­tance, and polygamy—lagged be­hind. From that gap emerged women who car­ried Hos­sain’s work for­ward: Is­mat Chugh­tai, who stood tri­al for ob­scen­i­ty in 1942 for Li­haaf; and Anis Kid­wai, who chron­i­cled the rav­ages of Par­ti­tion in In Free­dom’s Shade.

To­day, Mus­lim women in In­dia con­tin­ue to walk the line be­tween hy­per­vis­i­bil­i­ty and ex­clu­sion. In Kar­nata­ka in 2022, school­girls were barred from their class­rooms for wear­ing the hi­jab. The courts up­held the ban. Triple Ta­laq was crim­i­nalised in 2019—seen by some as a nec­es­sary re­form, by oth­ers as a top-down in­ter­ven­tion en­act­ed with­out con­sul­ta­tion. Ac­cord­ing to the AS­ER Re­port, Mus­lim girls re­main among the least like­ly in In­dia to com­plete sec­ondary school. Laws like the Cit­i­zen­ship Amend­ment Act and Na­tion­al Reg­is­ter of Cit­i­zens have cre­at­ed deep in­se­cu­ri­ty, es­pe­cial­ly among un­doc­u­ment­ed women with­out birth or mar­riage cer­tifi­cates.

Yet de­spite all of this, Hos­sain’s lega­cy is un­bro­ken. When she wrote, “The era is over when men would tram­ple on us and still have us lick­ing their boots,” she made clear that she would not buck­le un­der pa­tri­archy. That same re­fusal runs through the po­et­ry of Fehmi­da Ri­az, as seen in Rana Ayyub’s Gu­jarat Files, which laid bare the com­plic­i­ty of state of­fi­cials dur­ing the 2002 pogrom when Naren­dra Mo­di was the Chief Min­is­ter of Gu­jarat. It is loud in Meena Kan­dasamy’s jagged, nec­es­sary prose, and in Sa­ba De­wan’s work, which re­claim the lives of cour­te­sans, sex work­ers, and oth­er women writ­ten out of his­to­ry.

Ed­u­ca­tion re­mains the rev­o­lu­tion. The Sha­heen Group in Kar­nata­ka runs hos­tels and schools for Mus­lim girls, many from un­der-re­sourced back­grounds. En­rol­ment at uni­ver­si­ties like Ali­garh Mus­lim Uni­ver­si­ty and Tata In­sti­tute of So­cial Sci­ences is ris­ing, even as Is­lam­o­pho­bia deep­ens and pub­lic fund­ing tight­ens.

And then there is the di­as­po­ra. In Ju­ly 2025, In­di­an Prime Min­is­ter Naren­dra Mo­di—a leader of the Hin­du na­tion­al­ist Bharatiya Jana­ta Par­ty and a cen­tral fig­ure in In­dia’s right­ward po­lit­i­cal shift—vis­it­ed Trinidad and To­ba­go and Guyana, part of a re­gion­al tour cel­e­brat­ing In­di­an di­as­po­ra ties. He was wel­comed for­mal­ly in both na­tions, but the sym­bol­ism was clear­est in Guyana, where he had re­ceived the Or­der of Ex­cel­lence from Pres­i­dent Ir­faan Ali, a prac­tis­ing Mus­lim, months ear­li­er, in No­vem­ber 2024.

The ges­ture sig­nalled a shift—how­ev­er care­ful—to­wards in­clu­sion. Whether it was diplo­mat­ic bal­ance or sin­cere recog­ni­tion, it marked a mo­ment.

Trinidad’s Mus­lim women have lived through a dif­fer­ent kind of in­vis­i­bil­i­ty. Many are the de­scen­dants of in­den­tured labour­ers who ar­rived be­tween 1845 and 1917, speak­ing Ur­du and Bho­jpuri, car­ry­ing prayer books, spices, and the mem­o­ry of a home­land that had al­ready be­gun to for­get them.

They built mosques from scratch, taught their chil­dren to re­cite the Qur’an at dawn be­fore head­ing off to colo­nial schools, ran mar­ket stalls and sewing ser­vices. Their work was lo­cal, un­record­ed, and of­ten un­ac­knowl­edged. But they raised daugh­ters who be­came doc­tors, lawyers, judges, uni­ver­si­ty lec­tur­ers, diplo­mats, en­gi­neers, en­tre­pre­neurs, nov­el­ists, and pub­lic fig­ures—Mus­lim women ex­celling in every field, ground­ed in both faith and moder­ni­ty.

Like Hos­sain, they trans­lat­ed their faith and cul­ture in­to ac­tion, in ed­u­ca­tion, trade, and com­mu­ni­ty life.

Even the ar­dent cham­pi­ons of a saf­fron In­dia must recog­nise that Mo­di’s re­cep­tion in Guyana—where he re­ceived the coun­try’s high­est ho­n­our from a Mus­lim pres­i­dent—sig­nals some­thing more pro­found. In­dia can­not af­ford to side­line Mus­lim women, who are part of a glob­al com­mu­ni­ty of near­ly two bil­lion. Their voic­es are ris­ing—cross­ing bor­ders, gen­res, and gen­er­a­tions—de­fy­ing stereo­types. Even un­der im­mense pres­sure, they are step­ping for­ward, speak­ing out, and claim­ing space both with­in and be­yond their com­mu­ni­ties. In do­ing so, they are chal­leng­ing era­sure and con­tempt, and of­fer­ing the world a fuller, more in­clu­sive vi­sion of progress.

A cen­tu­ry af­ter Hos­sain imag­ined a world gov­erned by rea­son and jus­tice–the ques­tion of the women who are seen, heard, pro­tect­ed, have equal ac­cess to all it takes to live a free, just and full life-across bor­ders and be­liefs—re­mains ur­gent and po­lit­i­cal.

Ira Math­ur is a Guardian Me­dia colum­nist and win­ner of the 2023 OCM Bo­cas Prize for Non-Fic­tion. Vis­it www.iras­room.org | Email: iras­room@gmail.com

Au­thor en­quiries: iras­room@gmail.com


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored