During his wind-up week in office, Prime Minister Dr Keith Rowley highlighted what he obviously considered his major achievements and contributions to the development of T&T and its people during his ten-year term of office.
Recurring in his recapping was the construction of the hospitals of Point Fortin, Arima, and the block of the Port-of-Spain General, the Tobago Airport Terminal Building; separately, was his Government’s handling of the emergency wrought by COVID-19 and its deadly visitation on the national population.
What such contributions have going for them is service to the national population. Vital health infrastructure of a country, particularly when it meets the needs of people of all social classes and incomes, can be considered the serum of life; without a healthy population, all is lost. The terminal building at Crown Point has not only the potential to serve more adequately the needs of travellers between Port-of-Spain and Scarborough but also for economic development through tourism in Tobago, with production and service linkages to Trinidad.
One outstanding feature of the high-cost projects, though, is the need, in addition to the Auditor General’s scrutiny of expenditure, for deep forensic auditing, which can tell the nation whether there were wastages and corruption in the management of the big projects.
T&T has too long a history of questionable and fraudulent dealings, with hundreds of millions spent without proper accounting—succeeding governments and parties have laid blame against each other for alleged corrupt practices.
Above all the utility of the construction facilities, I consider the Prime Minister and his Government’s effort at keeping in check the potentially explosive spread of COVID-19 from being a health disaster to resonate as the administration’s greatest achievement.
This conclusion is reached without seeking to diminish the importance of the health infrastructure and airport facility for day-to-day travellers and to facilitate the potential for economic growth (tourism) and possible long-term development. I do so because I consider the construction of health infrastructure the basic responsibility of a government in office with investment capacity to do so.
COVID-19 was a shot out of the blue and presented a unique challenge. PM Rowley gained high marks for keeping public servants in pay, thereby preventing a major disaster from befalling the economy if public servants were unable to meet mortgage payments, adequately deal with their grocery bills, and keep children in school when they were reopened.
Regarding treatment and prevention measures, the leadership of PM Rowley in the COVID-19 period was to develop policies and programmes on the advice of those with specialised knowledge to treat the virus and its crippling effects. He recognised the value of lending a listening ear, not usually a feature of governments. He valued the advice, policies, and prescribed measures of the health professionals and institutions by honouring Dr Roshan Parasram and his staff; we shall come to the advice he disregarded.
The Government’s intervention in Petrotrin and the eventual creation of Heritage into a profitable state-owned oil and gas company, along with the recent indication from PM Rowley that hopefully an arrangement will be made to sell the refinery facilities, can turn out to be amongst the major achievements of PM Rowley’s administration. This is not to be unconscious of the deep pain that the closure of Petrotrin inflicted on workers and their families in the area.
Then there are less significant achievements, such as the increase in personal income tax allowances, the forgiveness of interest owed—which returned billions to the Treasury that may never have been recovered—and a decrease in property tax. The establishment of a new taxation system, provided it does not prove to be regressive, ie, not dig deeper into the pockets of middle- and lower-income classes, can be successful if it shuts off leakages from the payment of corporation taxes.
PM Rowley’s management of his successorship is a question for PNM institutions and members from the highest to the lowest level to address. Notwithstanding such a party responsibility, the dictation as to who should lead has an impact on the national polity, as it continues the control by an oligarchy of the politics. The arms of the PNM, which allowed for it to continue along the pattern set for it from its birth, have once again concretised the leadership domination and have left it as the pattern adopted and followed by all political parties and the political culture of T&T.
What devolves from that dominant leadership culture is that PM Rowley, one of the political leaders of the post-independence period into the 21st century, did not seek to transform the nature of government and governance into one which involved the population. Instead, the governance pattern followed by PM/political leader Rowley continued the culture of the marginalisation of people to the periphery of society; he pursued faithfully the pattern of colonial governance set out for him and society by Britain.
The latter is of vital significance, as the breakaway from top-down rule by an oligarchy through the invasion of the masses of the playing field can make a dramatic difference to human, political, and economic development.
To be continued.
Tony Rakhal-Fraser–freelance journalist, former reporter/current affairs programme host and News Director at TTT, programme producer/current affairs director at Radio Trinidad, correspondent for the BBC Caribbean Service and the Associated Press, graduate of UWI, CARIMAC, Mona and St Augustine–Institute of International Relations.
