In this summary recounting the performance of Kamla Persad-Bissessar as political leader of the United National Congress and Leader of the Opposition inside and outside of the Parliament, it’s clear that she has been trapped in the oppositionist politics mode laid down by her predecessors.
Basdeo Panday once noted after becoming prime minister on the first occasion that he was so inured to the role of the leader of the Opposition and Manning as the prime minister that at times he referred to himself in his previous role.
In keeping with the constitutional structure and functioning of the Parliament, the Opposition Leader and his/her team can do little else but stand in the Parliament and deliver political strokes over the backs of the Government in office. Outside the chamber, the role of opposition parliamentarians is to ramajay on the stomp against every initiative, thought, programme and perceived corrupt or otherwise dealing of the executive.
In that role Opposition Leader Persad-Bissessar has mainly focused on reactive criticism of the Government, its policies and programmes, which is in the nature of the politics and which has all but been baked into the parliamentary system operated here. It’s a system in which the Opposition is left with few options of a significant kind but to oppose. In the few instances in which the Leader of the Opposition is required to perform meaningful constitutional responsibilities, the holder of the office has little room for creative political intervention.
In what has become quite politically and visually lively and appealing campaigning, political leader Persad-Bissessar has engaged the weekly television Monday night forum and used it for the party’s main overture to the electorate.
But inside of the Parliament, Mrs Persad-Bissessar has made little impact on the operations of the Government except for blocking on a few occasions legislation which required a special majority which the Government does not have. One significant such instance has been making it known that it will oppose any intention and attempt by the Government to have the Caribbean Court of Justice replace the Privy Council as the final court of appeal for T&T.
Another aspect of the UNC politics which Persad-Bissessar did not invent but has played out superbly is the politics of disintegration. Not only was she unable to hold together the coalition People’s Partnership of 2010, which won the Government, but within her own party, she has presided over a number of fallouts leading right up to the doorstep of the April 28 general election.
It’s the second lead-in to an election that she has dispensed with a number of entrenched UNC MPs. Such political house-clearing is always fraught with conflict; it has not been different on this occasion.
As in the nature of what I called at the top “oppositionist politics,” Persad-Bissessar has concentrated her efforts on criticism of the policies and programmes of the Government and took particular aim at Minister Fitzgerald Hinds and “Rowley”; she may have gained a measure of traction by the strategy, the two having got out of the political firing range.
Over the last couple weeks of campaigning, since the election date was announced, Persad-Bissessar has concentrated on promising a range of better-times programmes and financial enticements to certain groups of the electorate.
Amongst the promises made were salary negotiations for public servants starting at ten per cent, the cutting out and trimming of various taxes inclusive of VAT and property taxes, increasing the fuel subsidy and a few of the same nature, ie, ones which give hope to the groups identified.
What is seriously lacking is a comprehensive plan through which the UNC offers can be financially realised. Ironically, the alleged absence of a plan to drive a national effort has been one of the major indictments that the Opposition Leader has made against the Government. The same can now be asked of her: “Where is the plan to address the fundamental needs of the economy, polity, and criminality, the latter beyond placing a noted crime fighter amongst the candidates of the UNC?”
Notwithstanding those easily identified deficiencies of leadership to take the country forward if elected to office at the end of this month, Persad-Bissessar has the assured voting support of her party’s faithful.
On yet another occasion, the UNC has also struck relationships with a couple of small political outfits to hopefully help the party get over the line on polling day. As in the past, the UNC and its associated parties will have to face the challenge of holding together whether in opposition or in government.
Notwithstanding the absence up to this point of verifiable and reliable opinion polls, there is a general view based on seats traditionally held by the two major tribal parties that the outcome of the election in Trinidad will be close. As stated in this column on a previous occasion, if the circumstances evolve such that the two seats in Tobago can determine which party walks away with the Government, THA Chief Secretary Farley Augustine, as political leader of the Tobago People’s Party, will position his party to horse trade.
But the three-week period before the election leaves, in reality, an eternity for political campaigning errors, foolish and/or smart statements by politicians and revelations of one kind or the other.
Tony Rakhal-Fraser – freelance journalist, former reporter/current affairs programme host and news director at TTT, programme producer/current affairs director at Radio Trinidad, correspondent for the BBC Caribbean Service and the Associated Press, and graduate of UWI, CARIMAC, Mona, and St Augustine—Institute of International Relations.
