The continuing intensification of Israel’s war on Gaza over the last three months, the Russian invasion and destruction of Ukraine as a means of occupying the state, and the intention of Venezuela to confiscate the large Essequibo region of Guyana have been the major international headlines of 2023.
The eventual outcomes of all three are going to be even more explosive into the coming year as they have not reached their peak potential for mass death, destruction, dislocation and trend-setting which can foment and boil over into wars that can engage and spread across the globe; and that is not hyperbole.
In the instance of Russia, the conquest of Ukraine is merely the first step along the way of President Vladimir Putin’s design to re-establish Russia’s pride through the re-creation of the Soviet Union to be a challenger for world geo-political and military hegemony to rival the United States.
Putin’s Strongman ambition is driven, much like Adolf Hitler’s and Germany’s determination to get even with Euro-America’s crushing of German pride resulting from the post-war Treaty of Versailles which shared out portions of Germany and imposed severe financial penalties on the vanquished state.
Aware of Putin’s intent, Finland and Sweden have already sought cover under the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation of the West.
President Putin has indicated that his assault on Ukraine is not going to end until the Russian flag is raised in Kiev. He must be conscious that he cannot return to Moscow empty-handed after the cost in human lives, financial resources expended and exposure to the world of the less-than-dominating Russian military fighting power against a weak nation, even when it’s bolstered by Western support.
Can the Russian economy, its available fighting forces and military hardware last another two years without resorting to nuclear weapons to achieve Putin’s objective of making Ukraine Russian territory? It’s the question the world will have to contemplate in 2024, more so that President Putin has with seemingly more than a bluff said the use of nuclear weapons is not outside of what’s possible.
Typical of historical CIA solutions would be to effect leadership change in Moscow through one means or the other, as it has done on dozens of occasions across the world. Russia is obviously different from Chile, Putin from Allende.
If settlement comes to the use of nuclear weaponry, the world of 2024 will explode with Armageddon-type effects in the context of the refusal of both the East and or the West to back down.
In Gaza, all the indications are that Israel intends not merely to annihilate Hamas, its leaders and fighters, but to clear the land (Israel) of the Palestinians once and for all. The Israeli army has pushed the Palestinian people from the already squashed confines of Gaza to the extreme south on the borders of Egypt and Jordan.
Are the two million Gazans to be forced into exile alongside the 750,000 Palestinians who were driven out and without the possibility of returning to their homeland post the 1948 invasion and 1967 war?
If the USA was not previously fully exposed for its unremitting support for whatever Israeli leaders determine, its grants of military equipment, its upped financial support, its protection of Israel at the United Nations Security Council and its warnings of other states favourable to Palestine not to get involved, now makes it known as an unrepentant supporter of terrorism in its raw form.
Up to this point, the leaders of other Arab countries in the Middle East have made but token responses to the near-genocidal attacks on the Palestinian people. The 20,000-plus murdered victims include more than 70 per cent of civilians, women and children slaughtered by the big brave Israeli soldiers.
What can be the boiling point of this war on the Palestinian people, will be when the two million residents of Gaza and the three million in the West Bank are shoved onto the lands of other Arab nations. And while US vice-president Kamala Harris has vowed that the US will not allow that to happen, Israel’s PM Netanyahu has already done a myriad of things which a democratic and conscience-filled government in Washington should not have allowed.
In our own backyard, there are seemingly insoluble contestations between Venezuela and Guyana over the Bolivarian Republic’s already-displayed intent to gobble up two-thirds of the richly resourced portion of Guyana’s sovereign territory, the Essequibo.
This is yet another building contest which will not be definitively resolved by diplomacy, international law and law courts. At the recent meeting in Argyle, St Vincent and the Grenadines focused on keeping the peace, Guyana’s President Mohamed Irfaan Ali made it clear there will be no compromise on Guyana’s sovereign territory, no agreement to share the resources of Guyana’s Essequibo; no deals with the South American modern-day conquistadors.
Raw politics of conquests, superior military force and the support of the majority of the international community will ultimately determine the resolution of the conflict. Already, both American and British battleships have made reconnaissance trips through the Caribbean Sea.
To be continued: Caricom’s challenge.
Tony Rakhal-Fraser is a freelance journalist, former reporter and current affairs host at TTT, news Director of CNMG and AVM Television, correspondent to the BBC Caribbean Service, the Associated Press and current columnist for the Sunday Guardian.
