It is easy to understand the deep frustration being felt by Homeland Security Minister Roger Alexander, a former senior police officer, in his call for children to face the courts as adults when charged with serious criminal offences. The number of such instances he must have experienced during his decades of frontline police work with young people involved, must surely have influenced his present-day thinking.
However, Alexander’s advocacy may be far from a meaningful and long-lasting solution to more than a couple decades of young people, from their early teens to 20s, being deeply involved in criminal activity.
The reality is, if implemented, what is seen as a solution may turn out to have the effect of spreading and deepening the criminal culture into which young people are being sucked. That is, they may very well become enured in such treatment and so determined to fit the role that society has mapped out for them. And that will be opposed to treatment meant to demonstrate understanding, display leniency and for an appreciation of the need for rehabilitation.
Yes, it has become overbearing and unacceptable to see young people involved in major criminality of the kind society has experienced in recent years. But one reality of treating the young offenders as adult offenders means tossing them into the same cells with hardened criminals. In such accommodation, they will be tutored by the irretrievably criminal. The result will be yet another generation of criminals to create havoc for the rest of the nation.
We are not knocking Minister Alexander, appreciating that during his career as a crime fighter, he attempted to conquer lawlessness by young and old. But then, he did what could have been expected of him as a law enforcement officer.
Today, however, Alexander is in an elevated and expanded role as Minister of Homeland Security. Surely, one element of his job will be to bring solutions to the table to deal with our youth who have gone astray. We are, therefore, suggesting that he gets the technical officers in his ministry to develop a plan for the transformation of youth trapped in a life of crime.
This does not mean letting young people off the hook, but rather to introduce and/or expand on rehabilitation to prevent criminality from being soaked into their lifestyles. We are also not advocating that errant young people only receive the proverbial “slap on the wrist” when they commit crimes; we are saying that punishment must be accompanied by reform.
If not, Alexander’s ministry and those of his colleagues engaged in other crime-fighting endeavours will be exhausted out of their usefulness, with generations of even more criminally-minded and intent young people adopting lifestyles with no possibility of return.
If such projections become reality, then Alexander, his colleague ministers, the other security agencies of the government and the national population will become deluged and without hope to counter and to reform young criminals and bring change to their lifestyles.