A change in government is an opportunity for renewal. Fresh eyes should bring a fresh view. This administration inherits all of its predecessor’s problems. Most are not new and would have existed during Kamla Persad-Bissessar’s first term as Prime Minister. Circumstances have changed markedly since 2015 and require greater urgency.
First, the economy is slowly emerging from a depression which began in 2014 when energy prices declined. Economic growth is weak. Gas production has declined significantly since then. The 2014 exploration incentives brought only a reprieve and did not provide a long-term fix to the natural gas shortage. The management of existing lease concessions must be improved, and smaller fields brought into production, amongst other measures.
Second, declining natural gas production also signals the imperative of a more diversified approach to the country’s energy needs. Economic growth requires adequate energy resources to power business enterprises. The comparative advantage that came from cheaper gas is gone. That means we must invest in renewable energy. This is good business sense and commensurate with our climate change commitments and our energy requirements.
Third, declining natural gas production requires the development of other exports to meet the country’s foreign exchange needs. The private sector must lead this drive but cannot proceed without government facilitation in improving the ease of doing business and market outreach. This is a long-term effort that needs more than five years. In the short run, a more realistic market-based mechanism must be adopted to address the current foreign exchange shortages and to incentivise diversification.
Fourth, economic growth is much weaker than the boom times that existed in Mrs Persad-Bissessar’s first term. During that period, transfers and subsidies doubled from $15 billion in 2010 to $30 billion by 2015, becoming the most significant item in government expenditure. Given the depression, the budget deficit increased, as did borrowings and the national debt. Lower revenues have made balancing the Government’s expenditure with its cash flow more complicated.
Fifth, changing demographics indicate that our population is ageing. The social security system is stressed as the National Insurance Board can no longer meet its obligations from contributions and investment income and must sell assets to finance the shortfall. At the current rates, the NIB will be bankrupt in the early 2030s.
An ageing population increases the demand for social assistance, senior citizens' grants, pensions and health care. New mechanisms must be found to generate the resources to fund these growing demands. In short, an ageing population means that citizens will have to work longer and retire later, and everyone will have to pay more.
Sixth, an ageing population implies a smaller workforce. To achieve a decent lifestyle, the smaller working population will need to be more skilled in the sciences and produce at world-class standards. Our education system is presently far from achieving those standards.
Addressing these challenges requires a national commitment to clearly articulated goals and discipline to stay the course. These are big objectives for a population that has grown accustomed to a lifestyle facilitated by energy rents.
Changing the national mindset is the key to addressing these challenges. The property tax regime, the Revenue Authority and the demerit points system were mechanisms to improve compliance with national objectives. Revoking these initiatives sends the wrong message. Successfully addressing these difficult national challenges requires a different leadership style that does not play to the gallery.