Senior Multimedia Reporter
peter.christopher@guardian.co.tt
Credit Unions are not averse to being regulated by the Ministry of Finance.
Despite only 60 to 65 per cent of credit unions being fully compliant with financial sector regulations, president of the Co-operative Credit Union League of T&T, Auldric Neptune said this was due to a lack of oversight rather than defiance.
“Yes, we admit that not all credit unions are compliant and there are a number of reasons for that. Some of the issues have to do with resourcing. Some of the issues have to do with the timely production of reports. Now, at the end of the day, in the context of the movement itself, there are a lot of built-in safeguards in the movement, in terms of we want to use it in self-regulations, where we adhere to the PEARLS ratio,” Neptune told a Joint Select Committee which was an “Inquiry into the Supervisory and Prudential Oversight of Credit Unions in Trinidad and Tobago”
Neptune said, “In terms of the league’s audit and request of information from the credit unions, which already provided, we have not seen anything in the documents provided to us that suggests that there are any fundamental flaws or weakness in the movement.”
However MP Rishad Seecharan and former Finance Minister Vishnu Dhanpaul raised questioned about the continued labeling of credit unions as a movement, when they commanded billions of dollars of investments.
Dhanpaul pointed to the lack of protection for taxpayers following the collapse of the Hindu Credit Union (HCU), as he asked about the League’s stance with regard to falling under a regulatory body like the Central Bank or Ministry of Finance.
In response, Neptune said, “Well, let me remove that perception. There’s no fear by the League of being regulated. We have no issue with regulations. As we have said, we have invited regulations, and we are not saying that the Ministry of Finance cannot regulate the league.”
Neptune said he could encourage credit unions to obtain insurance to avoid any possible crisis on the level of the HCU.
“If we are speaking about the failure of Hindu Credit Union and the loss of funds, we have accepted, and we have said, we have absolutely no objections to deposit insurance coverage for credit unions. That would mitigate against, quote, unquote, in the event of failure, the taxpayer bearing the burden of repaying members. We have no issue with that, as it is something that can be implemented almost immediately in the context of the direction,” said Neptune.
