JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, July 27, 2025

Economists: Moody’s and IMF reports show weak economy

by

1341 days ago
20211124

Geisha Kow­lessar-Alon­zo

The re­cent state­ment by the IMF press con­firms what is al­ready know: that the T&T econ­o­my is out of bal­ance on both ex­ter­nal and in­ter­nal ac­counts, ex­ac­er­bat­ed by the nec­es­sary re­sponse to the COVID-19 shock, says econ­o­mist Dr Ter­rence Far­rell.

On Fri­day No­vem­ber 19, the In­ter­na­tion­al Mon­e­tary Fund (IMF) con­clud­ed its two-week an­nu­al vis­it to this coun­try and pub­lished its in­de­pen­dent as­sess­ment

In the con­clud­ing state­ment of the IMF’s 2021 Ar­ti­cle IV mis­sion to T&T, the Wash­ing­ton DC-based in­sti­tu­tion said the do­mes­tic econ­o­my is ex­pect­ed to grow by 5.7 per cent in re­al terms in 2022.

The growth next year will be “re­in­forced by the con­tin­ued pol­i­cy sup­port and the an­tic­i­pat­ed re­cov­ery in oil and gas pro­duc­tion.”

The IMF state­ment al­so said the Gov­ern­ment “act­ed de­ci­sive­ly” to con­tain the pan­dem­ic.

Mean­while in May 2020, in the midst of the pan­dem­ic and in a con­text of wreck­ages in the oil and gas mar­kets, Moody’s had put a neg­a­tive out­look to T&T’s cred­it rat­ing.

This was main­ly based on COVID-re­lat­ed fis­cal slip­pages.

Re­cent­ly, Moody’s an­nounced that it down­grad­ed T&T’s out­look.

And in re­sponse to Moody’s down­grade, Fi­nance Min­is­ter Colm Im­bert ar­gued; “This de­ci­sion by Moody’s col­lides with the pol­i­cy ad­vice we have re­ceived from all in­ter­na­tion­al or­gan­i­sa­tions to pro­tect our coun­try and sup­port the re­cov­ery in the cur­rent cir­cum­stances.”

Ac­cord­ing to Far­rell al­though the re­ports came al­most si­mul­ta­ne­ous­ly, the two or­gan­i­sa­tions have fo­ci.

He ex­plained that the IMF is con­cerned with the coun­try’s ex­ter­nal and in­ter­nal (fis­cal) bal­ances and its oblig­a­tions un­der the IMF Ar­ti­cles while Moody’s is con­cerned with the coun­try’s ex­ter­nal debt pro­file and its abil­i­ty to meet its oblig­a­tions to cred­i­tors over the medi­um and long term.

“Nei­ther or­gan­i­sa­tion is ex­pert in de­vel­op­ment pol­i­cy and what is re­quired to en­gi­neer growth in an econ­o­my like ours,” Far­rell said.

He not­ed that the IMF staff, who are “en­joined to be pos­i­tive about mem­ber coun­tries and not to be overt­ly and pub­licly crit­i­cal, see grad­ual im­prove­ment in the near-term due to im­proved pro­duc­tion and prices in the en­er­gy sec­tor.”

Fur­ther, he said, it is al­so oblig­ed to ac­cept the Gov­ern­ment’s promis­es about what it will do to re­store bal­ance on the ex­ter­nal and fis­cal ac­counts, even if past ex­pe­ri­ence sug­gests oth­er­wise.

For ex­am­ple, Far­rell said, im­prove­ments in tax ad­min­is­tra­tion have been pro­posed for sev­er­al years now in or­der to re­duce avoid­ance and eva­sion and which in his view are nec­es­sary.

“But even the wa­tered-down Rev­enue Au­thor­i­ty pro­pos­als could be de­railed and, even if im­ple­ment­ed, will take sev­er­al years to bear fruit.

“Same with the vexed ques­tion of trans­fers and sub­si­dies and with the size of the pub­lic sec­tor. The ob­sta­cle to im­ple­men­ta­tion in those ar­eas is al­most en­tire­ly po­lit­i­cal,” Far­rell said.

He added that with­out tough ac­tion to ad­dress pub­lic rev­enue and ex­pen­di­ture and by sup­press­ing forex de­mand and with a de­lib­er­ate avoid­ance of us­ing the ex­change rate to help re­store ex­ter­nal bal­ance, “we are stuck, hop­ing and pray­ing” that oil and gas prices will re­main high and that gas pro­duc­tion will re­bound.

“Hope and prayer are im­por­tant, even es­sen­tial, but need to be ad­duced in aid of sen­si­bly craft­ed macro-eco­nom­ic and de­vel­op­ment poli­cies, not as a sub­sti­tute for such poli­cies,” Far­rell said.

Mean­while, the For­mer Deputy Gov­er­nor of the Cen­tral Bank said be­cause Moody’s was chas­tised for its con­duct lead­ing up to the fi­nan­cial cri­sis, it is very ag­gres­sive in en­sur­ing that its rat­ing de­ci­sions can­not be seen as com­pro­mised.

While S&P, Far­rell added, in the face of ris­ing debt lev­els, may have been as­sured some­what by the im­plic­it mort­gag­ing of the HSF and hence en­cour­aged to set­tle for a neg­a­tive out­look and not to down­grade,

“Moodys is clear­ly not as­sured and sees a weak­er cred­it pro­file even with a re­bound in growth over the next cou­ple of years,” Far­rell said.

How­ev­er, the find­ings of nei­ther re­port help T&T with the growth and de­vel­op­ment poli­cies it needs to for­mu­late and im­ple­ment, nor should the coun­try be look­ing to those in­sti­tu­tions for help in that re­gard, Far­rell ex­plained.

“But we know, or ought to know what we need to do,” Far­rell said.

He sug­gest­ed the coun­try in­crease the in­vest­ment rate (on which there is no da­ta); to di­rect in­vest­ment to the right ar­eas, that is, ac­tiv­i­ties which ad­dress the glob­al mar­ket­place and can gen­er­ate for­eign ex­change earn­ings and those ac­tiv­i­ties have to lever­age re­sources that T&T has (agri­cul­tur­al, lo­ca­tion, cul­tur­al), but al­so utilise knowl­edge in­no­v­a­tive­ly to pro­duce goods and ser­vices to sell to the world.

Fur­ther, Far­rell em­pha­sised T&T has to put “twice, three times as much ef­fort, time and re­sources” in­to eco­nom­ic di­ver­si­fi­ca­tion as it does on the en­er­gy sec­tor.

Ad­di­tion­al­ly he sug­gest­ed this coun­try needs to en­gen­der a cli­mate in which the pri­vate sec­tor can be pro­duc­tive, em­pha­sis­ing that means in­ter alia, re­duc­ing crime and mak­ing the coun­try safe; im­prove in­fra­struc­ture—wa­ter, telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions, pay­ments sys­tems, roads and pub­lic trans­porta­tion; root out cor­rup­tion and dis­re­spect, and weed out the cul­ture of de­pen­den­cy and en­ti­tle­ment which is a drag on pro­duc­tiv­i­ty.

“This re­quires hard, sus­tained dis­ci­plined work over many years with­out the dead­weight of in­ternecine con­flict which has poi­soned our pol­i­tics and dri­ven many right-think­ing cit­i­zens to the edge of de­spair. Moody’s and the IMF can’t do any of that for us; we have to do it for our­selves,” Far­rell added.

Ac­cord­ing to econ­o­mist Dr Roger Ho­sein, the IMF’s growth pro­jec­tion for 2022 of 5.7 per cent is very wel­come news and could help the econ­o­my to pay some of its bills and re­duce its debt to GDP ra­tio.

“Note though, that giv­en that parts of the econ­o­my in 2020 and 2021 were closed be­cause of COVID-19 re­stric­tions, one would ex­pect for the FY 2022 once we are ful­ly “re­opened” the growth per­for­mance would be high­er than the years in which we closed. Thus, part of the growth is the “open­ing back up of the econ­o­my growth,” Ho­sein ex­plained.

He cit­ed that even with this growth pre­dict­ed by the IMF for 2022, the econ­o­my would still be small­er than in 2019 (and of course sig­nif­i­cant­ly small­er than in 2015).

Ac­cord­ing to Ho­sein, a clos­er look at the da­ta al­so in­di­cat­ed that the ma­jor­i­ty of the growth is com­ing from the en­er­gy sec­tor.

But he ques­tioned whether this is the growth the coun­try wants.

“Af­ter the ex­tent of eco­nom­ic stag­na­tion this econ­o­my un­der­went in 2009 to 2021 and the de­pres­sion from 2016 to 2021 that growth from any­where is good and should be cel­e­brat­ed. How­ev­er, we al­so have to be wary as it is this same en­er­gy sec­tor that played a sig­nif­i­cant role in caus­ing the econ­o­my to be in its cur­rent sti­fled po­si­tion,” Ho­sein ex­plained.

Fur­ther, he said these num­bers al­so mean the struc­ture of the econ­o­my drifts more to­wards a greater lev­el of de­pen­dence on the en­er­gy sec­tor.

Pol­i­cy mak­ers, Ho­sein ad­vised, would al­so have to now mon­i­tor the in­fla­tion rate as well, which ac­cord­ing to the IMF re­port, is ex­pect­ed to move north.

He added that ris­ing prices and a de­cline in nom­i­nal per capi­ta GDP (com­par­ing 2016 and 2022 on­ly) are not a good com­bi­na­tion.

“In­deed, the IMF re­port al­so care­ful­ly points out that the cen­tral gov­ern­ment pri­ma­ry bal­ance re­mains in deficit and even more, the non-en­er­gy as­pect of the pri­ma­ry bal­ance widens: not good at all,” Ho­sein said.

Con­tin­ued on page 9

Fur­ther, he not­ed that a care­ful look at the da­ta pre­sent­ed by the IMF al­so showed that for FY 2022 bud­getary rev­enues are set to in­crease but the bud­getary rev­enues are set to im­prove main­ly be­cause of the en­er­gy rev­enue com­po­nent which ris­es from 8.4 per cent in FY 2021 to a pro­ject­ed 10.6 per cent in FY 2022. Cap­i­tal ex­pen­di­ture is set to re­main at 2.1 per cent of GDP for FY 2022, the same as in FY 2021.

“Very wor­ry­ing­ly the con­clud­ing state­ment shows that by the time FY 2022 has elapsed, the ex­ter­nal debt would have climbed to a lev­el 41 per cent high­er than in 2017 and ba­si­cal­ly equal to the stock of re­serves (which at the end of FY2022 is ex­pect­ed to stand at around US$5.7bn),” Ho­sein fur­ther cit­ed.

He al­so not­ed that the stock of re­serves in FY 2022 is pro­ject­ed to be 32 per cent less than in 2017 (or 50 per cent of the 2014 lev­el).

“All of the de­riva­tions by the IMF are premised on a price of nat­ur­al gas price of US$3.50 per mmb­tu and if for some rea­son the ac­tu­al price of nat­ur­al gas were to fall be­low that lev­el, then all of the num­bers above would need to be ad­just­ed down­wards,” Ho­sein added.

T&T’s debt ca­pac­i­ty

In the last six years the econ­o­my de­clined by 16.6 per cent and stacked up a fis­cal deficit of over $61 bil­lion,

ac­cord­ing to econ­o­mist Dr Vaalmik­ki Ar­joon.

He said this deficit didn’t al­low T&T to save – hav­ing en­tered the pan­dem­ic with al­ready high debt lev­els of 75.5 per cent of GDP, bal­loon­ing to a cur­rent val­ue of 87 per cent giv­en the fi­nan­cial stress of COVID-19.

Ac­cord­ing to Ar­joon, T&T is now deemed even riski­er by the glob­al com­mu­ni­ty for meet­ing its debt re­pay­ment oblig­a­tions, hav­ing been fur­ther down­grad­ed in the spec­u­la­tive grade cat­e­go­ry to Ba2 in the re­cent rat­ings ex­er­cise by Moody’s.

He ex­plained this rat­ing was an­tic­i­pat­ed, as last year’s rat­ing of Ba1 car­ried a neg­a­tive out­look.

“The out­look gen­er­al­ly pre­dicts the like­ly out­come of the next year’s rat­ing ex­er­cise, with a neg­a­tive out­look sug­gest­ing an ex­pect­ed down­grade (pos­i­tive and sta­ble out­looks pre­dicts an up­grade and no change to the rat­ings re­spec­tive­ly),” Ar­joon said.

Not­ing that T&T’s ca­pac­i­ty to car­ry this debt lev­el is “very slim” Ar­joon sug­gest­ed the on­ly so­lu­tion is to en­sure the econ­o­my not on­ly achieves pos­i­tive growth, but this growth must be sig­nif­i­cant and con­sis­tent to bring about rev­enues that will be able to cov­er the debt with much left to spend on mean­ing­ful de­vel­op­ment. “At this point, our eco­nom­ic per­for­mance in terms of GDP is close to 2005 lev­els,” he said.

Fur­ther, Ar­joon said while the IMF has fore­cast­ed a growth of 5.7 per cent next year, T&T’s GDP will still be worse than where it was over 2006 to 2019.

He added that in 2022, in­creased oil and gas pro­duc­tion, to­geth­er with en­er­gy de­riv­a­tive com­modi­ties such as methanol will bring the econ­o­my back to pos­i­tive growth.

How­ev­er, Ar­joon out­lined, the ex­tent of the growth de­pends on the na­ture of the pan­dem­ic and the in­fec­tion rates, adding that the coun­try is still a long way from achiev­ing herd im­mu­ni­ty, hav­ing on­ly 45.4 per cent of the pop­u­la­tion ful­ly vac­ci­nat­ed.

Ad­di­tion­al­ly, he said high­er en­er­gy prices are like­ly to per­sist well in­to 2022, and this will au­gur well for T&T’s rev­enue earn­ings bring­ing the deficit down to ap­prox­i­mate­ly $9 bil­lion.

These per­sis­tent deficits, Ar­joon iden­ti­fied, are gen­er­al­ly fi­nanced by debt, sug­gest­ing that the debt bur­den will con­tin­ue to pile up.

And high­er en­er­gy prices, he said al­so mean the State will be plac­ing more funds in­to the HSF, as the leg­is­la­tion gov­ern­ing the fund re­quires that a min­i­mum of 60 per cent of ex­cess en­er­gy rev­enues must be de­posit­ed in the fund - glob­al en­er­gy prices are cur­rent­ly much high­er than prices which the bud­get is pred­i­cat­ed on (an oil price of $65 and a gas price of $3.75).

“A key down­side risk is the con­tin­u­ing glob­al sup­ply chain is­sues and ship­ping costs that con­tin­ue to dri­ve up costs in the pri­vate sec­tor. The US is our largest trad­ing part­ner, and is cur­rent­ly fac­ing a 6.7 per cent in­fla­tion rate – the high­est in the last thir­ty years,” Ar­joon al­so not­ed.

He said giv­en T&T’s de­gree of im­ports cou­pled with the per­sis­tent­ly high ship­ping costs from Asia, and the high­er prices of raw ma­te­ri­als from for­eign sup­pli­ers, this coun­try will con­tin­ue to ex­pe­ri­ence price in­creas­es well in­to the third quar­ter of 2022.

And while in­fla­tion is pro­ject­ed by the IMF to be an av­er­age of 2.4 per cent in 2022 , it is like­ly to be high­er than this in the first half of the year, Ar­joon added.

He al­so ad­vised that giv­en the surge in in­ter­na­tion­al spend­ing ac­tiv­i­ties glob­al­ly from the pan­dem­ic pent-up de­mand, it is im­per­a­tive that lo­cal man­u­fac­tur­ers are bet­ter poised to take full ad­van­tage of it.

The EX­IM bank has pro­vid­ed much forex sup­port to the sec­tor but it is com­mer­cial bank that sup­ple­ments ac­tiv­i­ties of the banks.

Ar­joon ad­vised there­fore, that au­tho­rised deal­ers in­crease the pro­vi­sion of forex to these man­u­fac­tur­ers, to fa­cil­i­tate their in­creased pro­duc­tion and ex­ports, adding that this will con­tribute to healthy growth next year, as al­ready sev­er­al en­ti­ties in the pri­vate sec­tor have shut down op­er­a­tions ow­ing to the fi­nan­cial stress of the pan­dem­ic lock­downs and their in­abil­i­ty to af­ford the high­er prices from their sup­pli­er and ship­ping costs.

Fur­ther he said as the IMF would have rec­om­mend­ed, it is al­so im­per­a­tive the State ad­vance its tax col­lec­tion which will help to close the fis­cal gap.

And if suc­cess­ful the TTRA can gen­er­ate ap­prox­i­mate­ly $12 bil­lion in un­col­lect­ed tax­es, Ar­joon not­ed.

Ad­di­tion­al­ly, he ad­vised it is al­so es­sen­tial Gov­ern­ment ag­gres­sive­ly push cap­i­tal ex­pen­di­ture projects that were stalled due to the pan­dem­ic and oth­er im­ped­i­ments in­clud­ing bu­reau­crat­ic de­lays in the pub­lic sec­tor.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored