JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Tuesday, June 24, 2025

Economists: WASA, T&TEC subsidies not sustainable

by

GEISHA KOWLESSAR ALONZO
32 days ago
20250521

GEISHA KOW­LESSAR ALON­ZO

An­nu­al­ly, Gov­ern­ment sub­sidis­es T&T’s pub­lic util­i­ties—the Wa­ter and Sew­er­age Au­thor­i­ty (WASA) and Trinidad and To­ba­go Elec­tric­i­ty Com­mis­sion (T&TEC)—to the tune of over $2.5 bil­lion, ac­cord­ing to es­ti­mates made by for­mer Min­is­ter of Fi­nance, Colm Im­bert in Sep­tem­ber 2020.

In light of this stag­ger­ing fig­ure, could this be sus­tained giv­en T&T’s cur­rent eco­nom­ic state?

While he agrees that now is not the time to in­crease wa­ter and elec­tric­i­ty rates, econ­o­mist Dr Justin Ram, how­ev­er, is ad­vis­ing that Gov­ern­ment look at re­duc­ing its sup­port of some State-owned en­ter­pris­es and that they should ei­ther be “shut down, pri­va­tised or turned in­to pub­lic-pri­vate part­ner­ships.”

“Or even some of those state-owned en­ter­pris­es that need to be­come a lot more ef­fi­cient,” Ram told the Busi­ness Guardian in an in­ter­view adding, “One of those four cat­e­gories, you have to place all of those state-owned en­ter­pris­es and de­cide how you want to move for­ward.”

What are the four cat­e­gories?

Ram fur­ther ex­plained that the Gov­ern­ment needs to ask,”Do you need this State-owned en­ter­prise or not? Well, then you should shut it down if you don’t need it. If you need it and it is prof­itable, then you could pri­va­tise it. If you need it, it is some­what prof­itable, but it al­so pro­vides a good so­cial ser­vice, then you turn it in­to a pub­lic-pri­vate part­ner­ship.

“And of course, if it is some­thing that will not cre­ate a prof­it, but it pro­vides very, very good so­cial ben­e­fits, then you need to keep it as a state-owned en­ter­prise, but try to make it a lot more ef­fi­cient.”

On which state-owned en­ter­pris­es he thinks need to be shut down, Ram said he could not say with­out do­ing a prop­er analy­sis.

He how­ev­er, em­pha­sised that it is very im­por­tant that Gov­ern­ment ex­am­ines the prof­itabil­i­ty of state-owned en­ter­pris­es and de­pend­ing on where they fall with­in that spec­trum, then make a de­ci­sion as to what to do. So any­thing that is not prof­itable and pro­vides no so­cial ben­e­fit, you should seek to shut that down,” Ram main­tained.

Re­gard­ing trans­fers to house­holds Ram agreed that is some­thing Gov­ern­ment cer­tain­ly needs to look at. How­ev­er, he agreed with Gov­ern­ment’s de­ci­sion not to in­crease pub­lic util­i­ty rates at this time as it could re­sult in un­due stress on the pop­u­la­tion.

“You don’t want to be putting too much pres­sure on house­holds right now, be­cause if you do that, peo­ple don’t have jobs to go and get right now. Right now, the pri­or­i­ty has to be to im­prove the busi­ness en­vi­ron­ment and to im­prove the over­all growth rates of this econ­o­my ini­tial­ly. That for me is the cor­rect se­quence of events.

“Be­cause we have seen in the past, not nec­es­sar­i­ly here, but some gov­ern­ments have tried to en­gage in aus­ter­i­ty, there­by try­ing to cut gov­ern­ment ex­pen­di­ture and hop­ing that would lead to the growth but that nev­er re­al­ly quite pans out like that,” Ram stat­ed.

He added what needs to be done is to pro­mote growth in the econ­o­my now.

Over the week­end, Min­is­ter of Pub­lic Util­i­ties Bar­ry Padarath, told Guardian Me­dia that the Gov­ern­ment would hold true to the promise it made on the cam­paign trail not to raise elec­tric­i­ty rates at this time.

He said the Gov­ern­ment in­tends to re­view the op­er­a­tions of pub­lic util­i­ties com­pa­nies, par­tic­u­lar­ly the WASA and TTEC, to im­prove the qual­i­ty of sup­ply and the man­age­ment be­fore any­thing else is fur­ther done.

The RIC, which reg­u­lates the de­liv­ery of ser­vices by T&TEC and WASA, had rec­om­mend­ed an in­crease in elec­tric­i­ty rates and ser­vice charges for T&TEC cus­tomers and had pro­posed that all rates—for res­i­den­tial, com­mer­cial and in­dus­tri­al users of elec­tric­i­ty—in­crease by vary­ing amounts.

It had al­so rec­om­mend­ed that cus­tomers be billed on a month­ly cy­cle in­stead of the ex­ist­ing bi-month­ly cy­cle, adding that cus­tomers would be billed un­der a four-tier rate sys­tem in­stead of the pre­vi­ous three tiers.

Res­i­den­tial cus­tomers were ex­pect­ed to see an in­crease from 15 to 64 per cent; com­mer­cial cus­tomers will in­crease from 37 to 51 per cent, and in­dus­tri­al cus­tomers were ex­pect­ed to see an in­crease from 58 to 72 per cent.

Ramkissoon: T&T has abused sub­si­dies

Econ­o­mist Dr Ronald Ramkissoon took a dif­fer­ent take on the is­sue, stat­ing that as a coun­try, “we have tak­en ad­van­tage of or abused” many of the sub­si­dies that suc­ces­sive gov­ern­ments have al­lowed.

“We waste wa­ter, we waste elec­tric­i­ty, and there’s wastage across the board. We have be­come in­ef­fi­cient in the de­liv­ery of some of these ser­vices.

“In oth­er words, if we can in­crease the sup­ply of any prod­uct with­out in­creas­ing the cost through a more ef­fi­cient sys­tem, then fine. But I think all these ideas, sug­ges­tions have to be put on the ta­ble and we must un­der­stand that the econ­o­my is in a very dif­fi­cult place and we have to find an­swers,” he ex­plained.

He said if T&T is go­ing to have al­ter­na­tive poli­cies, as any gov­ern­ment is en­ti­tled to have, those al­ter­na­tive poli­cies need to be put on the ta­ble, to what the pre­vi­ous Gov­ern­ment had.

Ramkissoon added the pop­u­la­tion al­so needs to be aware of what those al­ter­na­tives are and what are the al­ter­na­tives to “rea­son­able rev­enues.”

“And we need to see those al­ter­na­tive pro­grammes, strate­gies. We need to see them put in­to place and let’s see if they’ll work,” Ramkissoon added.

He fur­ther stressed there needs to be oth­er sources of rev­enue for T&T.

“Un­less the coun­try finds al­ter­na­tive ways of rais­ing rev­enue, then if we con­tin­ue to run deficits, and if we con­tin­ue to sub­sidise ser­vices with­out ref­er­ence to how we are go­ing to fund them, we are on­ly go­ing to dig our­selves in­to a deep­er and deep­er hole.

“I am not say­ing whether we should keep or not keep the sub­si­dies, re­gard­less of whether it is re­lat­ing to what­ev­er util­i­ty. What I’m say­ing is that we need to un­der­stand, and the gov­ern­ment needs to un­der­stand, that we are go­ing to have to find rev­enues to con­tin­ue to sub­sidise what­ev­er we have been sub­si­dis­ing. And if we can do that, fine,” he said.

Ramkissoon not­ed that the econ­o­my is not de­liv­er­ing the kind of rev­enues that it used to, not­ing that the al­ter­na­tives are there.

These in­clude the sell­ing state as­sets as well as bor­row­ing but he warned they all have cer­tain im­pli­ca­tions.

“Our debt, in par­tic­u­lar ex­ter­nal debt, is al­ready very high. Do we want to con­tin­ue fund­ing sub­si­dies through bor­row­ing? Do we want to sell state as­sets? And there are some good rea­sons why we should di­vest some state as­sets in­to the hands of the pub­lic but do we want to do that? How quick can we di­ver­si­fy this econ­o­my that we have oth­er sec­tors gen­er­at­ing the rev­enues that will al­low us to con­tin­ue to pro­vide sub­si­dies? Does every­one need sub­si­dies, or should it not on­ly be for the very poor and those who re­al­ly can­not af­ford, are ques­tions we have to ad­dress,” Ramkissoon asked.

While he did not specif­i­cal­ly in­di­cate whether he sup­port­ed an in­crease in pub­lic util­i­ties rates ought, Ramkissoon said he was sim­ply lay­ing on the ta­ble what the op­tions are, as he main­tained that T&T can­not con­tin­ue to run large deficits.

“It has im­pli­ca­tions for the for­eign ex­change. It has im­pli­ca­tions for the fis­cal ac­counts and the man­age­ment of the macro­econ­o­my,” he added.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored