JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, July 26, 2025

How easily we accept being a third-world country

by

Curtis Williams
1158 days ago
20220526

Cur­tis Williams

The late Prime Min­is­ter Patrick Man­ning chal­lenged us as a coun­try, as a so­ci­ety, to dare to think that by 2020, we could be­come a first-world coun­try.

Part of the chal­lenge in­volved the mod­erni­sa­tion of our econ­o­my, our so­ci­ety, and all of the ser­vices we pro­vide.

The Vi­sion 2020 doc­u­ment was built on five pil­lars: com­pet­i­tive busi­ness en­vi­ron­ment; in­no­v­a­tive peo­ple; car­ing so­ci­ety; ef­fec­tive gov­er­nance; sound in­fra­struc­ture; and en­vi­ron­ment.

Its craft­ing in­volved many of the top minds and lead­ers in the coun­try. Vi­sion 2020 was meant, at least ini­tial­ly, to be bi­par­ti­san and had as its cor­ner­stone the mod­erni­sa­tion of every­thing from en­er­gy to na­tion­al se­cu­ri­ty.

Man­ning him­self did not achieve some of his own tar­gets, es­pe­cial­ly on the is­sue of in­fla­tion that led to the over­heat­ing of the econ­o­my and made home-own­er­ship in par­tic­u­lar, out of the reach of the work­ing class. But at least he had a vi­sion, a call to ac­tion, a path­way that asked us to dream of mov­ing out of this third world, plan­ta­tion econ­o­my with poor in­fra­struc­ture, fail­ing state en­ter­pris­es, in­se­cu­ri­ty and un­sus­tain­able spend­ing.

It was recog­nised that to get there re­quired a growth rate that ex­ceed­ed in­fla­tion and that struc­tur­al re­forms, in­clud­ing the link­ing of the en­er­gy sec­tor to man­u­fac­tur­ing, were nec­es­sary.

Ten days ago, Fi­nance Min­is­ter Colm Im­bert pre­sent­ed the 2022 Mid-Year Re­view and did a num­ber of things.

He told the coun­try that things were look­ing a lot bet­ter than it did when he pre­sent­ed the 2022 Bud­get last Oc­to­ber.

Rev­enue was sig­nif­i­cant­ly up, buoyed by the high­er re­ceipts from the en­er­gy sec­tor, with high­er rev­enue and more eco­nom­ic ac­tiv­i­ty that flowed from the open­ing up of the econ­o­my post-COVID-19 lock­downs.

The Fi­nance Min­is­ter was pleased that he did not bor­row any mon­ey to meet Gov­ern­ment ex­pen­di­ture since the start of the year. In fact, he was now in a po­si­tion to pre­dict that he was un­like­ly to need to bor­row for the rest of the fi­nan­cial year, as en­er­gy prices were like­ly to re­main good for the next four months of the fis­cal year.

High­er rev­enue meant that the Gov­ern­ment could pay some of its bills, bills like its ef­fec­tive loan of with­hold­ing VAT re­funds to busi­ness­es. Imag­ine the Min­is­ter of Fi­nance has the temer­i­ty to sug­gest that he was pro­vid­ing an im­pe­tus to busi­ness­es by re­pay­ing them their own mon­ey, which he ef­fec­tive­ly bor­rowed and which is nev­er reg­is­tered on the books as gov­ern­ment debt.

Be­yond that, the rev­enue gen­er­a­tion meant that some had to go to the Her­itage and Sta­bil­i­sa­tion Fund. Im­bert and the Gov­ern­ment took the op­por­tu­ni­ty to pat them­selves on the back for ad­her­ing to the law.

What the Min­is­ter of Fi­nance did not do was to ac­count to the peo­ple of T&T on the per­for­mance of the econ­o­my out­side of the wind­fall, and for which he has no con­trol and can take no cred­it.

You see, we all know that the prices of com­modi­ties are not sus­tain­able and will go down with­in the next 12 to 18 months. So, while the coun­try must be hap­py and make the best use of the wind­fall, it is not sus­tain­able, and in any case, T&T must fix the struc­tur­al prob­lems that af­flict the econ­o­my or we just will not do well as a coun­try.

If one had the pa­tience to look at the en­tire­ty of the de­bate, one would feel as if our MPs had ex­pe­ri­enced a state of malkadee. It is as if the need to ac­count for the mea­sures in the bud­get was not im­por­tant and the re­quire­ment to chart a vi­sion for the fu­ture not nec­es­sary.

Imag­ine the Min­is­ter of En­er­gy spends much of his time mak­ing the straw man ar­gu­ment that some­one was try­ing to tra­duce him by call­ing out his at­tempt, to at best pal­ter, when he did his in­ter­view with CNN’s Richard Quest.

What one might have hoped from the Min­is­ter, a de­fence that per­haps sug­gest­ed that should the po­lit­i­cal and eco­nom­ic iso­la­tion of Venezuela end, it is con­ceiv­able that there could be a path to both cross-bor­der and across-bor­der gas with the abil­i­ty to pro­duce all of the 10 tcf in Lo­ran/Man­a­tee and get an­oth­er 500 mil­lion stan­dard cu­bic feet per day from gas be­ing flared off­shore Venezuela.

He could per­haps have talked about the BHP project and the plans to bring it to mar­ket, or the po­ten­tial of the new deep-wa­ter blocks on of­fer, or the plans to launch the on-land bid round, and the suc­cess of Touch­stone in­spir­ing in­ter­est in more on-land ex­plo­ration. But it is noth­ing but malkadee and hubris that al­low him to fo­cus on the mes­sen­ger and not the mes­sage.

We should have heard of the digi­ti­sa­tion plans and pub­lic sec­tor re­form that will see the mod­ernising of a tech­nol­o­gy-dri­ven pub­lic ser­vice and one where the State can le­git­i­mate­ly af­ford to pay peo­ple prop­er salaries while it re­trains and pre­pares those work­ers who will have to find al­ter­na­tive ca­reers for life in the pri­vate sec­tor.

Nei­ther the rul­ing par­ty nor the Op­po­si­tion seemed to think that the fo­cus must be on the gov­ern­ment eas­ing it­self out of the high lev­els of trans­fers and sub­si­dies and fo­cus­ing on pro­tect­ing the most vul­ner­a­ble.

The Min­is­ter of Fi­nance was right to raise the is­sue of the amount of mon­ey spent on the Se­nior Cit­i­zen Grant and must put a plan in place to en­sure that in the next 15 to 20 years, the grant is not the bur­den it threat­ens to be and that con­trib­u­to­ry pen­sions plans must be the or­der of the day.

It can­not be good enough to live a life where you nev­er pay tax­es or NIS and get re­ward­ed for liv­ing to 65. Just to be clear, my moth­er re­ceives a por­tion of that grant, as she al­so re­ceives her NIS arrange­ments, and I am hap­py for her and all oth­ers. In fact, the ar­gu­ment I make here will ef­fec­tive­ly pre­clude me from such a grant should I live to 65. But we must seek what is in the best in­ter­est of the coun­try.

The Op­po­si­tion nev­er rais­es the is­sue of the rate of in­vest­ment in this econ­o­my which, as a com­po­nent of ag­gre­gate de­mand, in­vest­ment is im­por­tant, be­cause of its abil­i­ty to in­flu­ence the pro­duc­tive ca­pac­i­ty of the econ­o­my and there­by boost eco­nom­ic growth.

The ac­cep­tance of the state of the roads, the 12-year Point Fortin High­way project, the hun­dreds of mur­ders, the crass­ness of the pol­i­tics, the abil­i­ty of the Prime Min­is­ter to be near­ly conned with no one ask­ing about the ab­sur­di­ty of him try­ing to reach the UN Sec­re­tary-Gen­er­al on his mo­bile phone, with no one to take notes and lis­ten­ing in on the call, all reek of a third-world so­ci­ety.

How else do you ac­cept the pol­i­tics of the day when we make a po­lit­i­cal foot­ball of the deep wounds in­flict­ed on chil­dren and the pass­ing of the buck on who saw or did not see the Robert Sab­ga re­port? The is­sue is why noth­ing has been done about the re­port.

What we are now in up­roar about is not just the fail­ure of the State to act, it is that our at­ten­tion has again been turned to the fail­ure of in­sti­tu­tions. In a cou­ple of weeks we will get over it, just as we got over the Scott Drug Re­port, just as we got over the re­port in­to T&TEC that nev­er en­vi­sioned a na­tion­al black­out, just as we got over the re­port in­to East Port-of-Spain.

We ac­cept that it is okay for Port-of-Spain to flood every rainy sea­son, we ac­cept that wa­ter will not be avail­able to us 24/7, we ac­cept that the po­lice will have a de­tec­tion rate of 15 per cent at best and we ac­cept that jus­tice must hap­pen at snail’s pace. We ac­cept be­ing third world.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored