Raphael John-Lall
Economists all agree that the Government must roll out an effective industrial policy if it is to create sustainable jobs and a growing economy.
Following the Ibis Steel Company’s launch last week and the promise of almost 1,000 jobs if the company agrees to an expansion, economist Dr Vanus James told the Sunday Business Guardian it is not a “matter of optimism or pessimism,” but the history of T&T’s industrial development shows that previous governments made errors in how they attempted to industrialise the economy.
“From the records of 70 years, including Point Lisas, these energy sector industrial projects might help if they can be undertaken competitively but they will not solve the deep problems of large numbers of undereducated and underemployed workers arising from the enclave economy we have been operating. Both the Community-Based Environmental Protection and Enhancement Programme (CEPEP) and Unemployment Relief Programme (URP) actually testify to that. They were supposed to be holding patterns to be phased out by diversification. The energy-based industrial effort did not, and could not, deliver. We were simply not diversifying in an informed way.”
Ibis Steel is a subsidiary of US-based metals and industrial investment company, Pinnacle Steel and Vanadium Corporation.
Pinnacle’s chief executive officer, Edwin Bennett, said the company’s initial investment is planned at US$250 million and it proposes to create 350 jobs during the restart of the facility and 500 full-time jobs.
This comes at a time when there are concerns among different sectors of the population that the unemployment rate has been growing.
The Central Statistical Office’s (CSO) latest Labour Force Survey showed that the number of employed people fell by almost 6,000 between the fourth quarter of 2025 and the first quarter of 2026.
Former minister in the Ministry of Finance, Brian Manning said last week that T&T’s economic woes are compounded by the closure of the CEPEP and URP programmes that provided critical employment opportunities for vulnerable communities.
James said high-end industrial jobs will fill the vacuum, but the sectors that can deliver are the ones that demonstrably embody the country’s dynamic comparative advantages and innovative capacities.
He added thatit is important to match skills to whatever new industries the Government is planning.
“The record shows that they (workers) are displaced when the government focuses the strategy on the energy enclave. These advantageous sectors are the sectors that rely on high levels of education and related skills, and a high speed of learning to produce exportable output.”
He said education, healthcare, financial services, other professional services and the creative industries are sectors that can offer sustainable employment.
“Your main challenge here is that these are mainly owned and controlled by an authoritarian government. They can learn fast and export competitively if we know what we are doing but have been focused on servicing the domestic market and will remain so until we break the bonds of authoritarianism at all levels - the home, the schools, the political parties and the government, perhaps starting with the latter two.”
When asked if T&T’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth is expanding quickly enough to generate the types of jobs the economy needs, James said the problem is not economic growth.
“Surely, but to do so, we must first solve the problem identified…authoritarian government and politics. Our problem is not economic expansion, as the record demonstrates. We’ve had many bouts of that, from sugar to energy. What we’ve never had is growth with diversification.”
He said sustainable economic growth will solve not only unemployment but some of the nation’s other problems like the shortage of foreign exchange.
“This is the real test - what the facts of the country and the region suggest is the way to create sustainable jobs that exploit the country’s advantages, address the foreign exchange constraints and lead to sustainable growth with development.”
Skills training
Economist Dr Ronald Ramkissoon told the Business Guardian that there needs to be skills training for the unemployed who wish to access some of these new openings in the industrial sector.
“If lower income persons are to benefit from the announced large industrial projects, then appropriate skills training must be high up on the agenda of government and the private sector. In other words, planning for the transition period is critical. Hopefully, policymakers are so engaged.”
He added that the industrial projects announced by the Government will generate both higher skilled and lower skilled jobs.
“The projects in themselves are likely to hire fewer persons with specific high-end skills including engineers, etc. Lower end jobs are likely to arise from the construction phase and from some ancillary-type support services. For example, catering and retail businesses in the Point Lisas area, in particular, are likely beneficiaries.”
He made it clear that if the Government is to grow the economy and create jobs, it must be able to clear the bottlenecks that have stunted growth over the last few decades.
“As far as wealth and job creation are concerned, I have no doubt that this country can do far better than it is doing now. If the intention of policymakers is to generate faster, sustainable and inclusive economic growth, then they must recognise that such growth is much harder to achieve if constrained by corruption, crime, mistrust of government and ethnic strife. This has been proven globally as the multilateral institutions, some of which are based here, would attest to.”
Economist Dr Anthony Gonzales told the Sunday Business Guardian that he believes that unemployment has been rising due to the closure of several plants, the eradication or reduction of many make-work government jobs as URP, CEPEP and the decline in consumer demand.
“We do not have the correct numbers, but I suspect that the number of unemployed is significantly larger than the jobs now being created in Point Lisas in the short to medium term. So, while the jobs being created by the revival of the steel plant will help, this and even some of the other plant establishments mentioned for the medium term will not make a serious dent into the level of unemployment. It will take sizably more economic activity to do so.”
