JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, July 16, 2025

Is Mr Lee-Chin waiting on arbitration award?

by

433 days ago
20240509

On Mon­day morn­ing, a very re­li­able source told me that Port­land Bar­ba­dos, a com­pa­ny con­trolled by Ja­maican busi­ness­man Michael Lee-Chin, had de­fault­ed on a US$23 mil­lion bond that is owned by a num­ber of T&T in­sti­tu­tion­al and high net-worth in­vestors. There was al­so in­for­ma­tion that Mr Lee-Chin had sched­uled a meet­ing of bond­hold­ers to pro­pose a 90-day ex­ten­sion on the ma­tu­ri­ty date of the bond.

Im­me­di­ate­ly af­ter the in­for­ma­tion was re­ceived, a mes­sage was sent to Mr Lee-Chin out­lin­ing the in­for­ma­tion re­ceived and re­quest­ing a com­ment on the sta­tus of the US$23 mil­lion bond.

His re­sponse was, “De­fault does not hap­pen un­til the grace pe­ri­od ex­pires,” be­fore ex­plain­ing that the grace pe­ri­od was sev­en busi­ness days.

“There won’t be a de­fault,” Mr Lee-Chin stat­ed, adding, “I don’t see the val­ue of this pre­ma­ture re­port­ing. Is­suers get ex­ten­sions all the time.”

On Mon­day af­ter­noon, a May 1 let­ter from Re­pub­lic Bank Ltd—in its ca­pac­i­ty as trustee of the US$23 mil­lion, 8.5 per cent bond— ad­vised the Port­land Bar­ba­dos bond­hold­ers that the prin­ci­pal and in­ter­est on the bond, which ma­tured and be­came due on April 30, 2024, had not been re­ceived.

That let­ter stat­ed that it is an event of de­fault by Port­land Bar­ba­dos “if the com­pa­ny fails to pay with­in sev­en busi­ness days fol­low­ing the due date, any prin­ci­pal, in­ter­est and ar­rears of in­ter­est payable un­der this trust deed.”

There­fore, ac­cord­ing to the let­ter, if Port­land Bar­ba­dos did not make the April 30 pay­ment by the close of busi­ness on May 9, (to­day) “an event of de­fault would be deemed to have oc­curred.”

I was in­formed yes­ter­day that the bond­hold­ers, at their meet­ing on Tues­day, agreed to grant the 90-day ex­ten­sion re­quest­ed by Mr Lee-Chin. That was al­so re­port­ed in the Trinidad Ex­press.

Al­so yes­ter­day, the Ja­maica Ob­serv­er re­port­ed that two oth­er com­pa­nies that Mr Lee-Chin is as­so­ci­at­ed with—AIC (Bar­ba­dos) Ltd and Spe­cial­ty Cof­fee In­vest­ments Com­pa­ny—al­so have had to seek ex­ten­sions of the ma­tu­ri­ty dates of their bonds.

Re­gard­ing AIC (Bar­ba­dos) Ltd, Mr Lee-Chin wrote a let­ter to the gen­er­al man­ag­er of Ja­maica Cen­tral Se­cu­ri­ties De­pos­i­to­ry (JCSD) Trustee Ser­vices on April 11, 2024, seek­ing an ex­ten­sion of the fixed rate US$10 mil­lion se­cured notes by Bar­ba­dos com­pa­ny. That bond be­came due on Jan­u­ary 31, 2024.

“We have been work­ing with Ster­ling As­set Man­age­ment Ltd to re­fi­nance the notes, with lim­it­ed suc­cess in on­ly be­ing able to re­fi­nance a por­tion of the notes. We here­by re­quest a one-year ex­ten­sion of the due date for the re­main­ing por­tion of US$7,860,758.10...pro­vid­ing a new ma­tu­ri­ty date of Jan­u­ary 31, 2025.

“For the ex­ten­sion pe­ri­od, be­ing from Jan­u­ary 31, 2024 to Jan­u­ary 31, 2025, AIC Bar­ba­dos will be pay­ing note­hold­ers in­ter­est at the rate of 8.25 per cent per an­num.”

Is it un­usu­al that Mr Lee-Chin would write re­quest­ing an ex­ten­sion of a bond on April 11, 2024, when that bond ma­tured on Jan­u­ary 31, 2024?

The Ja­maica Glean­er first re­port­ed on April 24, 2024, that the bond­hold­ers of Spe­cial­ty Cof­fee In­vest­ments Com­pa­ny—a com­pa­ny that is owned by Port­land Hold­ings Inc, which is con­trolled by Mr Lee-Chin—”vot­ed to ex­tend the ma­tu­ri­ty of a bond by three months.” That ar­ti­cle al­so quot­ed the gen­er­al man­ag­er of JCSD Trustee Ser­vices as say­ing, “The bond­hold­ers vot­ed in favour of an ex­ten­sion to April 30 and in­ter­est will be paid.”

A Vic­to­ria Mu­tu­al Wealth Man­age­ment doc­u­ment dat­ed De­cem­ber 13, 2021, in­di­cates that the cof­fee com­pa­ny was look­ing to raise J$1.9 bil­lion (US$12.3 mil­lion) in three tranch­es: Tranche A was for a max­i­mum of two years at 9.75 per cent; Tranche B was up to a max­i­mum of three years at 7.25 per cent, what was de­scribed as a US dol­lar in­dexed; and Tranche C, al­so up to a max­i­mum of three years in US dol­lars.

What does this mean?

Why would three com­pa­nies con­trolled by Mr Lee-Chin be seek­ing ex­ten­sions of bond ma­tu­ri­ties in 2024?

One ex­pla­na­tion is that Mr Lee-Chin may not have the US-dol­lar liq­uid­i­ty to make these pay­ments. If he had the US dol­lars avail­able to pay the ma­tur­ing bonds, it is quite like­ly he would have done so.

In terms of con­se­quences, bonds is­sued by the com­pa­nies con­trolled by Mr Lee-Chin—Port­land Bar­ba­dos, AIC Bar­ba­dos and Spe­cial­ty Cof­fee In­vest­ments Ltd—as well as the NCB Fi­nan­cial Group are wide­ly held by in­sti­tu­tions and in­di­vid­u­als in both Ja­maica and in T&T.

For ex­am­ple, in its 2023 an­nu­al re­port, the Unit Trust Cor­po­ra­tion’s US Dol­lar In­come Fund lists NCBFG’s US$75 mil­lion 8.50 per cent term loan com­ing due on May 5, 2026, as its fourth largest hold­ing. That in­vest­ment con­sti­tutes 1.72 per cent of the US$234 mil­lion that the fund has un­der man­age­ment.

NCBFG bonds are al­so a top 10 in­vest­ment of the GK Ja­maican dol­lar mu­tu­al fund, which the Unit Trust Cor­po­ra­tion launched last year in a joint ven­ture part­ner­ship with GraceKennedy Ltd, the pub­lic com­pa­ny that is list­ed on both the Ja­maica and Trinidad and To­ba­go stock ex­changes.

Al­so, Guardian Hold­ings Ltd (GHL), which is ma­jor­i­ty-owned by NCBFG, is al­so be­lieved to own a sig­nif­i­cant num­ber of its par­ent com­pa­ny’s shares and bonds. A GHL ex­ec­u­tive did not im­me­di­ate­ly re­spond to a re­quest for clar­i­fi­ca­tion on how much NCBFG debt the T&T com­pa­ny car­ries in its var­i­ous funds and in­vest­ment ac­counts.

How will Mr Lee-Chin re­pay his debts?

On Oc­to­ber 6, 2023, Mr Lee-Chin ob­tained a fi­nal award of US$43.59 mil­lion, plus in­ter­est un­der the rules of the Unit­ed Na­tions Com­mis­sion on In­ter­na­tion­al Trade Law. That re­lates to an in­vest­ment dis­pute with the Do­mini­can Re­pub­lic un­der the Cari­com-Do­mini­can Re­pub­lic Free Trade Agree­ment.

He brought the claim against the Do­mini­can Re­pub­lic un­der the free trade agree­ment, re­gard­ing his in­ter­est in a Do­mini­can com­pa­ny, which held a long-term con­ces­sion con­tract to man­age a land­fill in San­to Domin­go.

In 2017, the Do­mini­can Re­pub­lic took mil­i­tary con­trol of the land­fill as well as tak­ing ac­tion to ter­mi­nate the con­ces­sion based on an al­leged en­vi­ron­men­tal emer­gency.

Mr Lee-Chin claimed sev­er­al vi­o­la­tions of the free trade agree­ment, in­clud­ing ar­bi­trary acts in­tend­ed to force him to op­er­ate the land­fill with­out re­ceiv­ing a fair tip­ping fee.

On No­vem­ber 6, 2023, ex­act­ly one month af­ter the ar­bi­tra­tion tri­bunal found in the Ja­maican busi­ness­man’s favour, the Do­mini­can Re­pub­lic sub­mit­ted a re­quest for rec­ti­fi­ca­tion of the fi­nal award, based on the coun­try’s sub­mis­sion that there were er­rors of com­pu­ta­tion, the ap­pli­ca­tion of an in­cor­rect dis­count rate and a mis­cal­cu­la­tion of the op­er­at­ing com­pa­ny’s cash flows.

In its Feb­ru­ary 29, 2024 de­ci­sion on the Do­mini­can Re­pub­lic’s re­quest for rec­ti­fi­ca­tion, the tri­bunal dis­missed the coun­try’s claim in its en­tire­ty.

The tri­bunal al­so or­dered the Do­mini­can Re­pub­lic to pay all costs re­sult­ing from the sub­mis­sion of its re­quest for rec­ti­fi­ca­tion in­clud­ing claimant’s costs, the ar­bi­tra­tors’ fees and ex­pens­es, and the di­rect ex­pens­es in­curred in this pro­ceed­ing.

If the Feb­ru­ary 29 fil­ing on the web­site of the In­ter­na­tion­al Cen­tre for Set­tle­ment of In­vest­ment Dis­putes is the last word on the is­sue, one imag­ines that the Do­mini­can Re­pub­lic would have tak­en steps to trans­mit the US$43.59 mil­lion, plus in­ter­est to Mr Lee-Chin’s pre­scribed ac­count.

On re­view­ing the fi­nal award from the ar­bi­tra­tion tri­bunal, Mr Lee-Chin told the Ja­maica Ob­serv­er, “I am very pleased with the re­sult and I feel I have been fi­nal­ly vin­di­cat­ed.”

He went on to note that he “ex­pects the Do­mini­can Re­pub­lic will im­me­di­ate­ly sat­is­fy the fi­nal award and ev­i­dence to the in­vestor com­mu­ni­ty, in­clud­ing all Ja­maican in­vestors, that the Do­mini­can Re­pub­lic, once found li­able, ho­n­ours its in­ter­na­tion­al oblig­a­tions.”

Has the ar­bi­tra­tion award been trans­mit­ted or is the north Caribbean coun­try in breach of its com­mit­ment to ho­n­our the award of the in­de­pen­dent tri­bunal?

One as­sumes that when Mr Lee-Chin re­ceives the ar­bi­tra­tion award, he will be in a po­si­tion to set­tle sev­er­al of the out­stand­ing bond.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored