JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, June 29, 2025

Secret deal: Govt agrees Atlantic LNG Train 1 is dead

by

Curtis Williamd
1222 days ago
20220223

Cur­tis Williams

Lead Ed­i­tor Busi­ness

cur­tis.williams@guardian.co.tt

Doc­u­ments show gov­ern­ment has giv­en up on Train 1

Qui­et­ly agrees to three train fa­cil­i­ty

All the while telling the coun­try it is still in ne­go­ti­a­tions

The Kei­th Row­ley ad­min­is­tra­tion has qui­et­ly walked away from any hope of sal­vaging At­lantic LNG Train 1 and has in­stead signed an agree­ment with Roy­al Dutch Shell, the Na­tion­al Gas Com­pa­ny and bpTT to uni­tise trains two, three and four in­to a sin­gle train.

The gov­ern­ment had an­nounced the plan to have a sin­gle LNG train fa­cil­i­ty and that it had signed a Heads of Agree­ment (HOA) with the multi­na­tion­als and the state-owned com­pa­ny, but it has nev­er told the coun­try the terms of the agree­ment.

The Busi­ness Guardian has how­ev­er re­ceived a copy of the HOA and it shows that the gov­ern­ment has agreed to the three-train fa­cil­i­ty.

In the HOA, the gov­ern­ment iden­ti­fied one of its main ob­jec­tive as be­ing, “the sus­tained op­er­a­tion of the uni­tised fa­cil­i­ty as a three train fa­cil­i­ty.”

T&T has four LNG trains.

The Busi­ness Guardian has al­so learnt that in the process Chi­nese in­vestors in Train 1 are out and NGC’s share­hold­ing in the re­struc­tured en­ti­ty will not be af­fect­ed by the clo­sure of Train 1. This was con­firmed to the NGC by bpTT and Shell, the two ma­jor share­hold­ers in At­lantic LNG.

In an­nounc­ing the sign­ing of the HOA a re­lease from the Min­istry of En­er­gy said, “The At­lantic LNG fa­cil­i­ty com­pris­es four (4) LNG Trains, each with dif­fer­ent share­hold­er struc­tures and com­mer­cial arrange­ments. It was agreed that the At­lantic LNG fa­cil­i­ties would be man­aged more ef­fi­cient­ly if brought un­der the frame­work of a sin­gle own­er­ship struc­ture.” Giv­ing the im­pres­sion that the re­struc­tur­ing in­volved all four trains when it knew ful­ly this was not on the ta­ble.

In the HOA gov­ern­ment said it want­ed fair and eq­ui­table up­stream re­turns and to en­sure that val­ue ac­crues to T&T.

The agree­ment reads: “The AL­NG re­struc­tur­ing project shall in­volve the con­sol­i­da­tion of three At­lantic LNG joint ven­tures in­to a uni­tised fa­cil­i­ty held by one joint ven­ture with a com­mon own­er­ship (the Uni­tised AL­NG) and the com­mer­cial frame­work for gas sup­ply, gas pro­cess­ing, LNG and NGL off­take. The mem­bers shall, and shall work with their af­fil­i­ates to re­struc­ture the three At­lantic LNG joint ven­tures to achieve a com­mon own­er­ship struc­ture in the Uni­tised AL­NG. The part­ners ac­knowl­edge that the fi­nal eq­ui­ty struc­ture of the Uni­tised AL­NG will be ne­go­ti­at­ed as part of the De­fin­i­tive Re­struc­tur­ing Agree­ments.”

The HOA is ef­fec­tive­ly the fi­nal nail in the Train 1 saga which has seen more than a quar­ter bil­lion of tax­pay­ers dol­lars wast­ed by the NGC in a failed at­tempt to re­vive the fa­cil­i­ty. Train 1 has been shut now for more than a year and the NGC’s ef­fort re­sult­ed in di­rec­tors of the com­pa­ny seek­ing to be pro­tect­ed from be­ing held li­able for the loss­es by seek­ing an in­dem­ni­ty from cor­po­ra­tion sole for loss of the mon­ey.

Fur­ther, the gov­ern­ment led by the Prime Min­is­ter Dr Kei­th Row­ley and the Min­is­ter of En­er­gy Stu­art Young, have con­sis­tent­ly said Train 1 is not yet dead and was sub­ject to ne­go­ti­a­tions. The HOA now shows that both Row­ley and Young are aware that Train 1 is no more.

This means that the coun­try has lost a quar­ter of its LNG ca­pac­i­ty and will now have to live in the long term with low­er LNG ex­ports even though the re­turns per mol­e­cule of nat­ur­al gas could be bet­ter de­pend­ing on the out­come of the fi­nal ne­go­ti­a­tions.

Ac­cord­ing to the HOA the AL­NG Re­struc­tur­ing Project shall be un­der­tak­en with ap­pro­pri­ate con­sid­er­a­tion giv­en to the terms and con­di­tions of ex­ist­ing com­mer­cial agree­ments for the At­lantic Fa­cil­i­ty.

It talks about cre­at­ing a uni­tised fa­cil­i­ty with the new li­cense com­ing in­to ef­fect up­on the ex­piry or joint­ly agreed ter­mi­na­tion of the ex­ist­ing liq­ue­fac­tion li­cense for the At­lantic fa­cil­i­ty.

But the HOA does not pro­vide any in­for­ma­tion on how long that li­cense should be for, sug­gest­ing that the mem­bers will have to pro­vide in­for­ma­tion to help the Min­is­ter de­ter­mine its du­ra­tion.

The HOA read, “Mem­bers agree to pro­vide any avail­able in­for­ma­tion as may be rea­son­ably re­quest­ed by the GORTT to as­sist in its de­ter­mi­na­tion of the length of the new sin­gle liq­ue­fac­tion li­cense to be is­sued.

The agree­ment al­so spelt out what would be gov­ern­ment’s rights in the re­struc­tur­ing.

The rel­e­vant De­fin­i­tive Re­struc­tur­ing Agree­ment to which the GORTT is a par­ty (for ex­am­ple, the liq­ue­fac­tion li­cense for the uni­tised fa­cil­i­ty) shall pro­vide GORTT with ac­cess to in­for­ma­tion re­gard­ing the com­mer­cial arrange­ments and op­er­a­tion of the uni­tised fa­cil­i­ty suf­fi­cient to en­sure that the GORTT can mon­i­tor and en­force the terms of the De­fin­i­tive Re­struc­tur­ing Agree­ment which it is a par­ty.

This term is seen as par­tic­u­lar­ly im­por­tant in light of the fact that T&T lost tens of bil­lion of US dol­lars in rev­enue as the multi­na­tion­als fetched sig­nif­i­cant­ly high­er prices for LNG than it paid in net-back pric­ing to the gov­ern­ment through a sys­tem of trans­fer pric­ing.

Nei­ther bpTT nor Roy­al Dutch Shell have ac­knowl­edged wrong-do­ing but have paid a cou­ple bil­lion TT dol­lars to the gov­ern­ment in good faith. A frac­tion of what it is be­lieved they earned from the prac­tice.

On­ly on Tues­day, Prime Min­is­ter ad­mit­ted that the coun­try lost bil­lions of US dol­lars in po­ten­tial rev­enue from LNG ex­ports and said the Gov­ern­ment has been hav­ing di­a­logue with com­pa­nies to en­sure a more eq­ui­table shar­ing of LNG rev­enues.

“We now have an op­por­tu­ni­ty to cor­rect this in­equal­i­ty con­se­quent on the pend­ing ex­pi­ra­tion of LNG li­cens­es and plans to re­struc­ture the LNG busi­ness in T&T.

“It is in sit­u­a­tions like this that the val­ue of the mem­ber­ship of T&T in the GECF takes on added sig­nif­i­cance. The ex­pe­ri­ence of the fo­rum which pos­sess­es 70 per cent of the world’s proven gas re­serves, 44 per cent of its mar­ket­ed pro­duc­tion, 52 per cent of pipeline, and 51 per cent of LNG ex­ports in the world is for­mi­da­ble and can be of im­mea­sur­able ben­e­fit to mem­bers,” Row­ley ex­plained.

The HOA agree­ment al­so pro­vid­ed for:

1) Up­on the im­ple­men­ta­tion of the AL­NG re­struc­tur­ing project the GORTT shall have the right to re­quest and re­ceive in­for­ma­tion and pe­ri­od­ic re­ports con­cern­ing the op­er­a­tion of the uni­tised the fa­cil­i­ty to de­ter­mined through the rel­e­vant de­fin­i­tive re­struc­tur­ing agree­ments re­gard­ing the cur­rent and planned util­i­sa­tion of the uni­tised fa­cil­i­ty and any pro­ject­ed ex­pen­di­ture in or­der to main­tain a line of sight re­gard­ing the uni­ti­sa­tion and sus­tain­abil­i­ty of the uni­tised fa­cil­i­ty.

The agree­ment not­ed that the Uni­tised AL­NG shall take no mar­ket price risk with the al­lo­ca­tion of such a risk to be the sub­ject of ne­go­ti­a­tion tak­ing in­to con­sid­er­a­tion and re­flect­ing the prin­ci­ples set forth in the HOA as be­tween a PE, it’s up­stream gas sup­pli­er(s)and LNG and NGC off­tak­ers.

“It be­ing recog­nised that noth­ing in the arrange­ment shall af­fect GORTT rights un­der pro­duc­tion shar­ing con­tracts and or up­stream li­cens­es un­less oth­er­wise agreed by the GoRTT and the rel­e­vant up­stream gas sup­pli­ers, does it af­fect any ex­ist­ing ap­provals un­der such pro­duc­tion shar­ing con­tracts,” the agree­ment reads.

It al­so leaves the mar­ket open to the pos­si­bil­i­ty of oth­er par­ties sup­ply­ing gas in­to At­lantic.

It said “the par­ties agree that the on­go­ing fi­nan­cial an op­er­a­tional vi­a­bil­i­ty of the uni­tised fa­cil­i­ty shall de­pend on the dis­cov­ery and de­vel­op­ment of ad­di­tion­al gas re­serves and en­hanced de­vel­op­ment and pro­duc­tion from ex­ist­ing re­serves as such and re­spect of the de­vel­op­ments by third par­ties that PEs shall use com­mer­cial­ly rea­son­able ef­forts to ne­go­ti­ate terms that fa­cil­i­tates ac­cess by third par­ty gas sup­pli­ers in the uni­tised fa­cil­i­ty on rea­son­able terms.”

To be con­tin­ued


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored