Global energy commodity prices are historically volatile, driven by everything from geopolitical conflicts, fluctuating weather patterns to global supply-demand imbalances. For T&T, closely monitoring these prices is of strategic importance. Energy commodity prices significantly influence the country’s budgeted revenue, social expenditure, deposits to the Heritage and Stabilisation Fund as well as investments in infrastructure. In the latest budget, the Government pegged budget revenue to an oil price of $73.25 per barrel and a gas price of US $4.25 per million British thermal unit.
In this article, the Trinidad and Tobago Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (TTEITI) will review the requirements of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) Standard, with respect to revenue management, analyze historic and current commodity price projections with budgeted price assumptions and offer some insights on future projections and market outlooks for fiscal 2026 and beyond.
T&T, as an EITI implementing country, under the EITI Standard 2023, is required to consider revenue forecasts and revenue management.
Specifically, EITI Standard requirement 5.3 notes that “implementing countries are expected to disclose any forecasts related to future revenues from the extractive sector, including the underlying assumptions related to projected production levels, projected project costs and projected commodity prices, where they exist”.
Given this context, several questions arise on how our projections are developed, their feasibility and historical performance versus actual prices. Previous budget statements indicated that national budget oil price assumptions were set using projections from international agencies, including the World Bank, IMF, credit rating agencies, the US EIA, and MEEI data.
Similarly, in a recent post-budget forum, the current Minister of Finance, Davendranath Tancoo noted that the oil price was based on a “basket of prices” calculated by the Ministry of Energy and Energy Industries (MEEI).
In the case of gas, for many years, the budget statement mentioned the “Henry Hub” US price as the benchmark for natural gas prices even as there was a significant shift in the destination markets for Trinidad LNG from the US to the European and Far East market. In the 2025 budget presentation, some clarity was given about the basis for the gas price forecast. It is now understood that the price forecast for natural gas prices is calculated using an average of European, Henry Hub and the Asian Market.
For oil, the “basket of crudes,” benchmark price weights assigned to different crudes within the basket remain undisclosed. In the case of both oil and gas, and under different administrations, the process for forecasting critical commodity prices falls short of the expectations for transparency required by the EITI Standard
It is important to distinguish between oil and gas price dynamics. There are many different grades of oil, based on the chemical profile, and benchmark prices provide a reference point for global transactions. Popular oil benchmark crudes prices are UK Brent and West Texas Intermediate. In contrast there is no single global price of gas. In some instances, oil and gas prices are indexed and gas also has benchmark prices based on different regional market price points.
For the budget, the gas price assumption is based on wellhead netback prices, which is the gas price at a destination minus pipeline, regasification, shipping and liquefaction costs. For this analysis, an average of European (NBP), North American (Henry Hub) and Asian (JKM) benchmark gas prices are used as the actual average gas price. For oil, an average of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) and Brent crude benchmark prices are used as the actual average oil price. “Actual prices” are not to be confused with the realized price T&T actually earned for its oil and gas, but rather an average of the benchmark prices listed.
For oil, between 2015 and 2025, the actual oil prices surpassed the budgeted oil prices for five of the 10 years (2017, 2018, 2019, 2021 and 2022) (see chart 1). Earlier this year, Heritage’s CEO noted that the company’s Molo heavy crude fetched prices over the Brent crude benchmark price due to less availability of Mexican and Venezuelan crude and Opec plus output cutbacks. This underscores how supply-demand imbalances can impact the price we earn for our oil and gas.
Between 2015 and 2025, the actual average gas price surpassed the budgeted gas price in every single year (see chart 2). Between 2015 and 2025, JKM, NBP and Henry Hub gas prices averaged US$11.80, US$11 and US$3 per mmbtu respectively, showing the variance in prices in different markets. This distinction is important because LNG cargoes from T&T are sold to these different markets.
And, there is little information in the public domain about the final price received for our LNG despite concerns over transfer pricing. In fact, the issues of fair market value, transfer pricing and tax avoidance have been major talking points in the T&T energy sector for several years. Studies conducted by Poten and Partners (the Gas Master Plan 2014-2024) and more recently United Nations ECLAC claim that the country loses over US$1.4 billion annually due to these practices. In the budget, Government pledged to adopt legislation to tackle this practice.
Given the available information, it may appear that previous Government price projections are conservative, but there still remains a lack of clarity about the assumptions and the forecasts. This also has ramifications for our intergenerational saving.
Under the HSF legislation, deposits are made to the fund if oil and gas revenues for that quarter exceed budgeted revenues by more than 10 per cent. Therefore, the price assumptions are critical. Between the decade, 2015-2024, there were withdrawals from the fund in five of the 10 years and deposits in only two of the 10 years assessed. Between 2007 and 2014, there were no withdrawals and six deposits during that eight year period.
Market Outlook and Future Projections
The latest US EIA short term energy outlook anticipates downward pressure on oil prices due to a rise in global inventories. The outlook forecasts that Brent crude prices will fall to an average of US$62 per barrel (b) in the fourth quarter of 2025 and US$52/b in 2026 and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil prices are expected to average about US$48.33 per barrel in 2026, marking a slight decline from the expected average in 2025. The US EIA also shows the Henry Hub natural gas spot price is forecasted to rise to US$4.10/MMBtu in January 2026. Other projections from the World Bank outlook forecasts a Europe Natural Gas price of US$10.8 per mmbtu and a Japan LNG price of US$11.5 per mmbtu.
Several factors influence these projections including higher US natural gas production and storage, ongoing trade negotiations and fallout over US tariffs, continued Russia and Ukraine tensions, increased OPEC production and China accumulating significant oil inventories. With these different variables at play, predicting energy commodity prices is not straightforward. Price trajectories are characterized by peaks and valleys.
In the short to long term, supply and demand dynamics will be fluid as macroeconomic outlooks decline or improve, demand for electric vehicles grow, not to mention continuing geopolitical flashpoints or busier hurricane seasons. T&T is a price taker with little control over fluctuating prices. We must continue to analyze changing price trends with an eagle eye, promote greater transparency on revenue projections while continuing to improve the ease at which we develop our resources and attract investment.
Chart 1-Budgeted Oil Prices Vs Actual Oil Prices
Chart 1, Chart element
Chart 2- Budgeted Gas Prices vs Actual Gas Prices
Chart 6, Chart element
