JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, August 10, 2025

2 in Marcia’s controversial cases to stand trial

by

Derek Achong
2396 days ago
20190117
Former chief magistrate Marcia Ayers-Caesar

Former chief magistrate Marcia Ayers-Caesar

Two men, whose pre­lim­i­nary in­quiry had to be restart­ed due to the con­tro­ver­sial ju­di­cial ap­point­ment of for­mer chief mag­is­trate Mar­cia Ay­ers-Cae­sar, have been com­mit­ted to stand tri­al for mur­der.

Desron Nero and Say­eed Al­bert were com­mit­ted by Chief Mag­is­trate Maria Bus­by-Ear­le-Cad­dle dur­ing a hear­ing of their case in the Port-of-Spain Mag­is­trates’ Court yes­ter­day.

The duo’s pre­lim­i­nary in­quiry was restart­ed last year and came to an end as Bus­by-Ear­le-Cad­dle ruled that the State had pre­sent­ed a pri­ma fa­cie case against them.

Nero and Al­bert are ac­cused of mur­der­ing Key­on Al­leyne and shoot­ing Frankie Cathrall with in­tent to mur­der him. The charges arose out of an in­ci­dent in east Port-of-Spain on No­vem­ber 29, 2011.

The de­ci­sion means that of the 53 cas­es, which were left un­fin­ished by Ay­ers-Cae­sar as she took up a ju­di­cial post in April 2016, on­ly two are still to be restart­ed and/or com­plet­ed.

In those cas­es, two groups of five and three men opt­ed to put their cas­es on hold as the State’s in­ter­pre­ta­tion claim, on the pro­ce­dure to be fol­lowed when a mag­is­trate sud­den­ly demits of­fice, was be­ing de­ter­mined.

On Jan­u­ary 4, Jus­tice Car­ol Gob­in ruled that restart­ing the cas­es was the on­ly op­tion avail­able in the cir­cum­stances.

“This is what the law re­quires and as the case law es­tab­lish­es it has so far been recog­nised as an im­por­tant mech­a­nism to pro­tect the Con­sti­tu­tion­al rights of an ac­cused per­son to a fair tri­al and hear­ing,” she said.

As a sec­ondary is­sue in the case, Gob­in was asked to con­sid­er a ju­di­cial re­view claim by one of the men, whose case was put on hold.

Akil­li Charles, who al­leged­ly spent over $150,000 in le­gal fees dur­ing the pre­lim­i­nary in­quiry, was claim­ing that it would be op­pres­sive to him and oth­er ac­cused per­sons if the cas­es had to restart.

Hav­ing ruled that there is no oth­er op­tion but to restart the case, Gob­in re­ject­ed Charles’ ap­pli­ca­tion.

How­ev­er, she de­scribed what tran­spired and how it af­fect­ed Charles and the oth­er ac­cused per­sons, as a trav­es­ty of jus­tice.

“The stain on the ad­min­is­tra­tion of jus­tice will re­main in­deli­ble long af­ter the cries and protests of jus­ti­fi­ably an­gry suf­fer­ing pris­on­ers have gone qui­et and long af­ter the fam­i­lies of vic­tims who, too, have been wait­ing for jus­tice to be done, re­sign them­selves to fur­ther de­lay,” Gob­in said.

The two re­main­ing cas­es be­fore Bus­by-Ear­le-Cad­dle are ex­pect­ed to com­mence next week.

In an in­ter­view on CNC3’s Morn­ing Brew pro­gramme ear­li­er this week, some of the men’s fam­i­ly com­plained over the fact that their rel­a­tives had each spent over a decade on re­mand while wait­ing for their tri­als.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored