JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, May 25, 2025

5 freed of businesswoman's murder thanks to judge's error

by

1059 days ago
20220701

Af­ter spend­ing al­most 17 years in prison and fac­ing three tri­als, five men con­vict­ed of kid­nap­ping a busi­ness­woman and al­leged­ly bury­ing her alive have been set free. 


De­liv­er­ing a judge­ment, yes­ter­day morn­ing, Ap­pel­late Judges Al­ice Yorke-Soo Hon, Mark Mo­hammed and Prakash Moo­sai up­held an ap­peal from Phillip “The Boss” Boodram, Roger Mootoo, Ricky Singh, Kervin Williams, and Aaron “Arc Eye” Grap­pie over their manslaugh­ter con­vic­tion and the 28 year-sen­tence they re­ceived. 


The ap­peal pan­el’s de­ci­sion in the case was due to mul­ti­ple er­rors made by the High Court Judge, who presided over their sec­ond re­tri­al in 2016, which the judges claimed left them with a “lurk­ing doubt” as to whether their con­vic­tions were safe and sat­is­fac­to­ry. 


Jus­tice Yorke-Soo Hon, who de­liv­ered the pan­el de­ci­sion, said: “In our view, giv­en the se­ri­ous na­ture of the er­rors made by the tri­al judge, the mul­ti­ple ma­te­r­i­al ir­reg­u­lar­i­ties iden­ti­fied, along with the fact that the fair­ness of the tri­al was se­vere­ly com­pro­mised due to the ad­verse pub­lic­i­ty dur­ing the course of the tri­al, com­bined with the is­sues sur­round­ing the ev­i­dence of the pros­e­cu­tion’s main wit­ness, Roderique, our hands are tied and we have no al­ter­na­tive but to al­low this ap­peal.” 


Af­ter de­liv­er­ing its judge­ment, the ap­peal pan­el gave the Of­fice of the Di­rec­tor of Pub­lic Pros­e­cu­tions (DPP) an op­por­tu­ni­ty to con­sid­er whether it want­ed to pur­sue a third re­tri­al for the group. 


Deputy DPP Joan Honare-Paul re­turned af­ter a short break and in­formed the court that a re­tri­al was not re­quired giv­en the out­come of the group’s tri­al and re­tri­al and the is­sues raised with the sec­ond re­tri­al, which were the sub­ject of the ap­peal. 


The men were dis­charged and thanked the ap­peal pan­el for their de­ci­sion. 


The group’s ap­peal cen­tred around the State’s case against them which was ex­clu­sive­ly based on the tes­ti­mo­ny of Nigel “Cat” Roderique, who claimed that he was present at a meet­ing at which the kid­nap­ping was planned, and at Ram­per­sad’s even­tu­al death. 

Roderique al­so al­leged that Ram­per­sad was kid­napped as he and the men wrong­ly be­lieved that she was the moth­er of a man who al­leged­ly owed Boodram $700,000. 

In the ap­peal, the group’s lawyers con­tend­ed that the judge, who presided over their tri­al, made mul­ti­ple er­rors in ad­vis­ing the ju­ry on how to con­sid­er the cred­i­bil­i­ty and re­li­a­bil­i­ty of Roderique’s ev­i­dence.


They are al­so claimed that the judge lim­it­ed their de­fence at­tor­neys’ ques­tions over Roderique be­ing al­lowed to plead guilty to felony mur­der in a sep­a­rate but sim­i­lar mur­der case be­fore he im­pli­cat­ed them.


The ap­peal pan­el agreed with their com­plaints over the judge’s han­dling of Roderique’s ev­i­dence. 


“In our view, the judge ought to have di­rect­ed the ju­ry on these is­sues in a man­ner in which it would not have been lost on them that they were en­ti­tled to take in­to ac­count any sim­i­lar­i­ties in de­ter­min­ing whether Roderique might have been re­spon­si­ble for both deaths and any im­pact that this might have in re­la­tion to his cred­i­bil­i­ty,” the pan­el said in its ex­ec­u­tive sum­ma­ry. 


“The judge al­so failed to prop­er­ly mar­shall the ev­i­dence of the bad blood be­tween Roderique and the ap­pel­lants which may have jus­ti­fied the in­fer­ence that Roderique’s ev­i­dence was taint­ed,” it added. 


The pan­el al­so up­held the men’s claim that the tri­al was com­pro­mised as the judge dis­missed con­cerns over a se­ries of con­tro­ver­sial re­ports pub­lished dur­ing the tri­al, which al­leged that Boodram was be­ing in­ves­ti­gat­ed in re­la­tion to the al­leged kid­nap­ping of a teacher, who was al­leged in a re­la­tion­ship with his daugh­ter. 

“We are of the view that an in­formed and fair-mind­ed ob­serv­er, who con­sid­ered the im­pugned print and me­dia pub­li­ca­tions, would con­clude that there was the re­al pos­si­bil­i­ty of bias af­fect­ing the mind or minds of one or more ju­rors,” it said. 


The group was rep­re­sent­ed by Ed­ward Fizt­ger­ald, QC, Paul Tay­lor, QC, Ra­jiv Per­sad, John Heath, Kel­ston Pope and Gabrielle Her­nan­dez. The State was al­so rep­re­sent­ed by As­sis­tant DPP Tri­cia Hudlin-Coop­er. 



Side Bar 
About the Case


The group was ini­tial­ly ac­cused of mur­der­ing Sam­daye Ram­per­sad. 

Ram­per­sad was kid­napped by masked men while stand­ing in front of her home in Pe­tit Bourg, San Juan on No­vem­ber 25, 2005. 

Her body was found 41 days lat­er in a shal­low grave in a cashew field in Car­oli­na Vil­lage, Clax­ton Bay.


One of the State’s wit­ness­es, foren­sic pathol­o­gist Hughvon des Vi­gnes, tes­ti­fied that an au­top­sy of Ram­per­sad’s body showed she died of as­phyx­ia and suf­fo­ca­tion con­sis­tent with be­ing buried alive.

Nine men were ini­tial­ly charged for Ram­per­sad’s mur­der, with three-Vi­vian Clarke, Steven McGillvery, and Per­nell Mar­tin - be­ing con­vict­ed on manslaugh­ter and sen­tenced to 30 years in prison in their first tri­al in 2009. 


An­oth­er ac­cused, Bob­by Sankar, was ac­quit­ted dur­ing that tri­al. 


Last year, the Privy Coun­cil up­held McGillvery’s ap­peal but af­firmed Clarke and Mar­tin’s con­vic­tions. 

The five re­main­ing ac­cused were put on tri­al again in 2012 but it end­ed in a hung ju­ry.

They were even­tu­al­ly con­vict­ed dur­ing a sec­ond re­tri­al which be­gan in 2016 and last­ed over a year. The men were each sen­tenced to 28 years in prison. 


The group was rep­re­sent­ed by Ed­ward Fizt­ger­ald, QC, Paul Tay­lor, QC, Ra­jiv Per­sad, John Heath, Kel­ston Pope and Gabrielle Her­nan­dez. The State was al­so rep­re­sent­ed by As­sis­tant DPP Tri­cia Hudlin-Coop­er. 
 


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored