JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, June 2, 2025

60,000 students suffering

While Ed­u­ca­tion Min­istry, TTUTA wran­gle over on­line teach­ing

by

Anna-Lisa Paul
1856 days ago
20200502

T&T's ar­cha­ic Ed­u­ca­tion Act of 1966 could be one of the rea­sons why Min­istry of Ed­u­ca­tion of­fi­cials are now seek­ing ad­vice from the Chief Per­son­nel Of­fi­cer and At­tor­ney Gen­er­al on how teach­ers can be made to ac­count for their work while at home dur­ing the COVID-19 pan­dem­ic.

Six weeks af­ter schools across the coun­try were closed as a re­sult of COVID-19, the Min­istry of Ed­u­ca­tion and the T&T Uni­fied Teach­ers’ As­so­ci­a­tion (TTUTA) con­tin­ue to wran­gle about the way for­ward on the is­sue of home­school­ing the more than 200,000 chil­dren through­out the coun­try via on­line meth­ods.

And there is noth­ing in the act that can com­pel teach­ers to teach stu­dents, par­tic­u­lar­ly in an on­line set­ting. It al­so does not ad­dress teach­ers at the Ear­ly Child­hood Care and Ed­u­ca­tion cen­tres, ter­tiary lev­el, or any sit­u­a­tion dur­ing the pe­ri­od of a pan­dem­ic.

While TTUTA and the min­istry con­tin­ue this dis­cus­sion, the stu­dent pop­u­la­tion has been left to suf­fer, par­tic­u­lar­ly the 60,000 stu­dents who re­main with­out tech­no­log­i­cal de­vices to en­able them to e-learn­ing plat­forms and those who were set to do ei­ther the SEA and CSEC ex­ams which were post­poned due to the COVID mea­sures.

Dur­ing a me­dia brief­ing last month, Min­is­ter in the Min­istry of Ed­u­ca­tion Dr Lovell Fran­cis said some 60,000 stu­dents were with­out any de­vices to ac­cess e-learn­ing plat­forms. The sit­u­a­tion re­mains the same some six weeks lat­er. This in­abil­i­ty to prop­er­ly tran­si­tion to re­mote learn­ing has now raised is­sues re­lat­ed to ac­cess and eq­ui­ty.

Teach­ing Ser­vice Com­mis­sion chair­man Dr Fazal Ali, who is al­so a Guardian Me­dia colum­nist, said the im­me­di­ate lo­gis­ti­cal chal­lenge is to guar­an­tee that all stu­dents have the tools and tech­nol­o­gy they need to learn re­mote­ly.

The min­istry con­tin­ues to come un­der heavy fire from par­ents and ed­u­ca­tion stake­hold­ers for its per­ceived lack of ac­tion in pro­vid­ing these chil­dren--and even some teach­ers--with the nec­es­sary tech­no­log­i­cal tools to ac­cess the e-learn­ing plat­forms and con­tin­ue with ed­u­cat­ing their charges.

In an un­ex­pect­ed move on Fri­day, how­ev­er, TTUTA gen­er­al sec­re­tary Kady Beck­les ad­vised mem­bers not to sign off on any con­tract or ac­cept lap­tops be­fore TTUTA has fur­ther dis­cus­sions with the min­istry.

The ad­vice was is­sued via re­lease late Fri­day and came hours af­ter TTUTA pres­i­dent An­to­nia Tekah-De Fre­itas told Guardian Me­dia the union had an un­der­stand­ing of the min­istry's ef­forts to reach teach­ers and stu­dents dur­ing the COVID-19 lock­down mea­sures.

The sud­den­ness of the present dis­rup­tion in school­ing has cer­tain­ly ex­posed the short­com­ings and how un­pre­pared the coun­try is for dig­i­tal school­ing in par­tic­u­lar.

Both the min­istry and TTUTA have been caught with their pants down.

The chal­lenges have arisen be­cause the new in­fra­struc­ture is soft.

"It is dig­i­tal not con­crete," said Ali, who added that "chil­dren are dig­i­tal na­tives but many adults re­main dig­i­tal mi­grants."

The forced and abrupt shift to re­mote learn­ing has not been with­out dis­rup­tion and dis­trac­tion every­where, Ali ob­served.

"Stu­dents are now ex­pect­ed to ad­just and to learn as much as they did in a pre-COVID-19 world with­out the vi­bran­cy of school life, cafe­te­ria con­ver­sa­tions, in­ter­ac­tions at lunchtime and those serendip­i­tous mo­ments of en­gage­ment ripe with last­ing so­cial con­nec­tions in cor­ri­dors. The rich bus­tle and ex­cite­ment of an in-per­son learn­ing en­vi­ron­ment is no more," he said.

But as the chal­lenge con­tin­ues, Ali said, "Some in­sti­tu­tions have man­aged the shift in an ar­che­typ­al man­ner; oth­ers are mov­ing with con­fi­dence to­wards suc­cess. All, how­ev­er, have more dis­tance to cov­er to achieve the bril­liance that de­lin­eates the ex­pe­ri­ence of re­mote learn­ing."

For schools to suc­ceed in the new COVID-19 vir­tu­al world, Ali said they must iden­ti­fy the tech-savvy stu­dents and staff to coach staff and oth­er stu­dents.

"Pi­lot­ing new ap­proach­es and build­ing on proven prac­tices builds pos­i­tive and en­dur­ing change. The build­ing of mas­sive open on­line con­tent plat­forms (MOOCs) aimed at un­lim­it­ed par­tic­i­pa­tion and open ac­cess like edX and Cours­era, and Apps like Class­Do­jo, have tak­en many learn­ing com­mu­ni­ties far ahead of the curve," Ali said.

"Nu­mer­ous in­ter­net and tele­phone ser­vice providers have signed the FCC Keep Amer­i­cans Con­nect­ed Pledge and are pro­vid­ing ben­e­fits like free hot spots with no da­ta caps to sup­port re­mote learn­ing. Bridg­ing the Dig­i­tal-Di­vide is a pri­or­i­ty of the new in­fra­struc­ture. In­for­ma­tion high­ways are need­ed more than ever. And they must be pa­trolled."

Weigh­ing in on the is­sue, for­mer chief ed­u­ca­tion of­fi­cer Ken­rick Seep­er­sad said while it was too harsh to say the min­istry had failed, “there is a great con­cern be­cause you have to look at it from the point of view of the chil­dren who need cer­tain­ty.”

De­scrib­ing the sit­u­a­tion as flu­id, he said there needs to be a lit­tle more risk and dis­tinc­tive lead­er­ship.

Gar­cia: We are do­ing our best

De­spite fac­ing a bar­rage of blows from crit­ics on so­cial me­dia for "fail­ing the na­tion's chil­dren," Ed­u­ca­tion Min­is­ter An­tho­ny Gar­cia has re­mained adamant he has been try­ing his best dur­ing this cri­sis. He said the at­tacks against him were mere UNC pro­pa­gan­da.

On Fri­day, Gar­cia said he would not re­spond to any­thing that ap­pears on so­cial me­dia.

“We are do­ing our work and we are con­fi­dent what we are do­ing will re­dound to the ben­e­fit of our stu­dents in par­tic­u­lar,” Gar­cia said.

Asked to re­spond to crit­i­cisms that the min­istry had failed teach­ers and stu­dents by mov­ing too slow­ly to en­sure e-learn­ing took place out­side the class­room dur­ing the COVID-19 pan­dem­ic, Gar­cia main­tained they act­ed swift­ly to mit­i­gate the ef­fects aris­ing out of the clo­sure of schools. He said dis­cus­sions are con­tin­u­ing with the rel­e­vant agen­cies on how the sit­u­a­tion in­volv­ing the 60,000 stu­dents can be ad­dressed with­out fur­ther de­lays.

“We are ad­dress­ing that sit­u­a­tion and we are con­fi­dent that a res­o­lu­tion to the prob­lem will be made. We are do­ing every­thing pos­si­ble to en­sure that every­body will have ac­cess…we are work­ing on that,” Gar­cia said.

“In ar­eas where there is no in­ter­net ac­cess, dis­cus­sions are on­go­ing with the Min­istry of Pub­lic Ad­min­is­tra­tion and the Telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions Au­thor­i­ty of T&T (TATT). We have ar­tic­u­lat­ed our po­si­tion and I have no fur­ther com­ment to make on that."

How­ev­er, Gar­cia was un­able to pro­vide a time line for a res­o­lu­tion to the mat­ter. Asked if his min­istry had re­ceived any of the emer­gency fund­ing al­lo­cat­ed by Gov­ern­ment to ready the na­tion for the COVID-19 fight, Gar­cia said, “That con­ver­sa­tion again…I will not take part in be­cause it is premised on un­truths. There is no $20 bil­lion we have put out for that, that is UNC pro­pa­gan­da. I will not com­ment on that.”

In 2017, there were 455 pri­ma­ry and 125 sec­ondary schools in T&T with a com­bined stu­dent pop­u­la­tion of 200,000.

Na­tion­al Pri­ma­ry Schools Prin­ci­pals’ head com­mends min­istry

Mean­while, Na­tion­al Pri­ma­ry Schools Prin­ci­pals’ As­so­ci­a­tion (NAPSPA) pres­i­dent Lance Mot­t­ley has en­dorsed the min­istry’s ac­cel­er­at­ed ef­forts to de­vel­op on­line plat­forms to move the ed­u­ca­tion sys­tem in­to the 21st cen­tu­ry.

Say­ing all school prin­ci­pals were ex­posed to the Ed­u­ca­tion Man­age­ment In­for­ma­tion Sys­tem (EMIS) plat­form when it was launched late last year, he said, “Be­fore COVID-19, we would have seen text­books on­line and al­so, the on­line en­gage­ment of stu­dents.

“Par­ents, teach­ers and stu­dents were al­so en­cour­aged to go on­line and pop­u­late the site with ma­te­r­i­al, so what COVID-19 would have done is ac­cel­er­at­ed the process so we are now see­ing the School Learn­ing Man­age­ment Sys­tem (SLMS) come on stream.”

Mot­t­ley com­mend­ed the min­istry for their ef­forts, even as he ad­mit­ted, “The en­tire coun­try is not wired for in­ter­net and the eco­nom­ic cir­cum­stances of many of our par­ents do not al­low them to have the lux­u­ry of hav­ing de­vices such as lap­tops and tablets for every sin­gle mem­ber of the house­hold.

“And giv­en the cur­rent pe­ri­od we are in, where peo­ple are los­ing their jobs, I do not think that ed­u­ca­tion might be a pri­or­i­ty for many of our par­ents who can­not af­ford ba­sic items such as food and shel­ter.”

NPTA: Min­istry failed par­ents, stu­dents, teach­ers

Ac­cus­ing the min­istry of fail­ing the coun­try, in­clud­ing teach­ers, stu­dents and par­ents, dur­ing this dif­fi­cult and frus­trat­ing time, Na­tion­al Par­ent Teacher As­so­ci­a­tion (NPTA) act­ing pres­i­dent Clarence Men­doza said, “There are no proac­tive mea­sures be­ing tak­en by the Min­istry of Ed­u­ca­tion, they are now just re­act­ing.

“The MOE has failed the coun­try, and par­ents and stu­dents by ex­ten­sion. And they have con­tin­ued to fail teach­ers who are al­so par­ents.”

TTUTA agrees to work-from-home pol­i­cy

TTUTA pres­i­dent An­to­nia Tekah-De Fre­itas be­lieves the min­istry has so far ad­dressed the sit­u­a­tion ac­cord­ing to the re­sources avail­able to them.

She said Gar­cia had con­firmed ap­proach­ing cor­po­rate T&T for as­sis­tance in procur­ing de­vices and ex­pand­ing and im­prov­ing in­ter­net ac­cess across the coun­try.

“As teach­ers, we may have to con­sid­er lend­ing ad­di­tion­al sup­port and mak­ing our own over­tures but I think the min­istry is try­ing as best as it can with­in the time frame they have to work with,” Tekah-De Fre­itas said.

Three days af­ter agree­ing to a work-from-home pol­i­cy for teach­ers, Tekah-De Fre­itas said they were yet to pro­vide the min­istry with an of­fi­cial doc­u­ment out­lin­ing their con­di­tions.

Not­ing the short pe­ri­od TTUTA had to gath­er da­ta on how many teach­ers and stu­dents were cur­rent­ly with­out lap­tops, she said, “We are con­cerned about the short time frame giv­en to us ful­fill that re­quest and it is putting quite a bit of pres­sure on teach­ers, who now have to use their re­sources to con­tact par­ents to get in­for­ma­tion for each child.”

Tekah-De Fre­itas said they had since reached out to the min­istry for an ex­ten­sion of the May 4 dead­line for teach­ers and May 5 for stu­dents.

Fol­low­ing its agree­ment to the work-from-home pol­i­cy, she said their next con­cern was how re­struc­tur­ing of the term will be done when­ev­er schools are re­opened.

De­ci­sive ac­tion need­ed: Ex-chi­eff ed­u­ca­tion of­fi­cer

Weigh­ing in on the is­sue, for­mer chief ed­u­ca­tion of­fi­cer Ken­rick Seep­er­sad said la­belling the min­istry’s ac­tions thus far as a fail­ure was a bit harsh. In­stead, he said, “There is a great con­cern be­cause you have to look at it from the point of view of the chil­dren who need cer­tain­ty.”

Seep­er­sad said while sec­ondary stu­dents were hap­py to have the ex­tra time, – since their ex­ams will not be ad­min­is­tered be­fore June/Ju­ly--it was cru­cial that pri­ma­ry school stu­dents writ­ing the Sec­ondary En­trance As­sess­ment (SEA) re­turn to school by mid-June, with the ex­am be­ing ad­min­is­tered by the first week in Ju­ly.

He said if the SEA ex­ams are not ad­min­is­tered be­fore Sep­tem­ber it will neg­a­tive­ly im­pact the rest of the ed­u­ca­tion sys­tem and set all stu­dents back and “every­thing is go­ing to be top­sy-turvy in Sep­tem­ber.”

“Re­mem­ber, there are chil­dren who need to be­gin pri­ma­ry school and there are many schools who will not be able to take them be­cause they would not have space for them,” Seep­er­sad said.

“There is need for some kind of plan­ning and di­rec­tion now, with de­ci­sive ac­tion need­ed.”

Seep­er­sad said the un­cer­tain­ty COVID-19 brings has the po­ten­tial to de­rail the Ear­ly Child­hood Care and Ed­u­ca­tion sys­tem and neg­a­tive­ly ham­per the smooth tran­si­tion of stu­dents in­to pri­ma­ry school.

Gopeesingh: Lap­top pro­gramme sus­pen­sion was retro-re­gres­sive

For­mer ed­u­ca­tion min­is­ter Dr Tim Gopeesingh mean­while blast­ed the Gov­ern­ment for its poor han­dling of the ed­u­ca­tion sec­tor dur­ing the pan­dem­ic.

He claimed the min­istry had tak­en a “retro-re­gres­sive” step by sus­pend­ing the lap­top pro­gramme in schools af­ter as­sum­ing of­fice in 2015, as teach­ers and stu­dents had been ini­ti­at­ed in­to ICT in sec­ondary schools.

For­mer ter­tiary ed­u­ca­tion min­is­ter Fazal Karim. mean­while. said the min­istry had aban­doned and ne­glect­ed ter­tiary and vo­ca­tion­al stu­dents.

He said since March, the coun­try's ed­u­ca­tion­al sys­tem had come to a grind­ing halt while ex­am­i­na­tion stu­dents had been left wor­ried and schol­ar­ship hope­fuls paral­ysed.

“Young peo­ple have re­duced chances of get­ting jobs and open­ing busi­ness­es giv­en the COVID-19 cri­sis. This is in­deed a wor­ry­ing con­cern," Karim said.

When the Sun­day Guardian con­tact­ed UWI St Au­gus­tine's School of Ed­u­ca­tion, Prof Jerome De Lisle said, "The sit­u­a­tion of ed­u­ca­tion amidst COVID-19 is a very flu­id one and is cur­rent­ly be­ing mon­i­tored."

BOX

Ques­tions to Gar­cia

Guardian Me­dia di­rect­ed these ques­tions, among oth­ers, to Ed­u­ca­tion Min­is­ter An­tho­ny Gar­cia in a tele­phone in­ter­view. How­ev­er, Gar­cia opt­ed not to re­spond to many of them.

Have CAPE and CSEC ex­ams been can­celled?

That mat­ter is still un­der dis­cus­sion and CXC is a re­gion­al ex­am and, there­fore, we have to have dis­cus­sions with the re­gion­al Min­is­ters of Ed­u­ca­tion be­fore we come to any de­ci­sion. The po­si­tion of the Gov­ern­ment of T&T is not to can­cel the ex­ams. Our prob­lem is to resched­ule the ex­am based on the ad­vice we re­ceive from the Min­istry of Health, as they are di­rect­ing us as we move for­ward con­cern­ing ex­ams.

What will hap­pen to those stu­dents who have al­ready un­der­gone as­sess­ment?

In terms of CAPE and CSEC, most of the schools have com­plet­ed their syl­labus, ex­cept that the SBAs have not yet been fi­nalised in terms of giv­ing a grade that will be sent to CXC.

What will hap­pen to those stu­dents from dis­ad­van­taged back­grounds who are more like­ly to have their grades un­der-pre­dict­ed?

All these ques­tions are the sub­ject of dis­cus­sions and the Min­istry of Ed­u­ca­tion is do­ing every­thing we can so that our stu­dents will not be left be­hind.”

Af­ter de­clin­ing to an­swer any fur­ther ques­tions, Gar­cia said, “The po­si­tion of the Gov­ern­ment has been ar­tic­u­lat­ed to CXC in writ­ing. I made a state­ment in Par­lia­ment on Wednes­day, that is, our pref­er­ence is for us to have the ex­ams in June/Ju­ly based on the ad­vice of the Min­istry of Health.

“The ex­am should in­clude Pa­per 1 which is mul­ti­ple choice, Pa­per 2 which is the es­say-type ques­tions, and al­so the SBA as­sess­ment. Those are the three things that Cab­i­net has agreed up­on and there’s noth­ing more I can say on it."


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored