JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, July 19, 2025

Audit lays serious allegations against Agricultural Society

by

2080 days ago
20191108
President of the ASTT Dhano Sookoo

President of the ASTT Dhano Sookoo

An au­dit re­port in­to the Agri­cul­tur­al So­ci­ety of T&T (ASTT) by the Cen­tral Au­dit Com­mit­tee (CAC) of the Min­istry of Fi­nance has un­earthed in­creas­ing al­le­ga­tions of im­pro­pri­ety, mis­man­age­ment of pub­lic funds, breach­es, unau­tho­rised use and dis­pos­al of as­sets and un­law­ful pos­ses­sion of State lands.

The CAC con­duct­ed the au­dit dat­ed Au­gust 2019, on the re­quest of Agri­cul­ture Min­is­ter Clarence Ramb­harat.

The ob­jec­tives of the au­dit were to de­ter­mine whether gov­er­nance arrange­ments and re­port­ing process­es were ro­bust and con­form to le­gal, reg­u­la­to­ry and best prac­tices.

The CAC re­viewed the gov­er­nance and fi­nan­cial arrange­ments of the ASTT over the pe­ri­od 2016 to 2018 with spe­cif­ic ref­er­ence to but not lim­it­ed to the fol­low­ing:

* A claim of $1,647,430.29 against the ASTT for un­paid rent.

* Pay­ment of month­ly fees to the ASTT board mem­bers.

* Main­te­nance of bank ac­counts by the ASTT.

The 32-page re­port stat­ed that in 2016 the min­istry wrote the Com­mis­sion­er of State Lands re­quest­ing an in­ves­ti­ga­tion in­to the al­leged dis­tri­b­u­tion of State lands in Chatham by the ASTT to its mem­bers.

It al­so stat­ed that the ASTT had not sub­mit­ted ac­counts to the Au­di­tor Gen­er­al for au­dit­ing for more than ten years.

“It pur­port­ed that the so­ci­ety was un­able to pre­pare it ac­counts for two rea­sons-the min­istry with­hold­ing fund­ing to the ASTT in 2013 and due to its op­er­at­ing records and as­sets held by its for­mer land­lord for non-pay­ment of rent.”

The re­port showed that the min­istry ex­pend­ed $32.8 mil­lion of State funds from 2007 to 2018 to the ASTT.

It fur­ther stat­ed that since 2008 the min­istry had re­ceived a myr­i­ad of re­ports and com­plaints about the so­ci­ety.

The au­dit found that the ASTT’s act was out­dat­ed and de­fi­cient to fa­cil­i­tate ad­e­quate gov­er­nance and over­sight of the so­ci­ety.

“There was lack of trans­paren­cy in the con­duct of its an­nu­al elec­tions, grow­ing con­cerns and dis­as­so­ci­a­tion by farm­ers groups and mem­bers of the so­ci­ety over the modus operan­di of the ASTT, lack of ac­count­abil­i­ty and re­port­ing to stake­hold­ers and fail­ure of the ASTT to pre­pare and sub­mit fi­nan­cial state­ments for more than ten years.”

The re­port fur­ther stat­ed there were in­creas­ing al­le­ga­tions of im­pro­pri­ety, dis­re­gard of rules of the ASTT, mis­man­age­ment of pub­lic funds, co-min­gling of funds, unau­tho­rised use and dis­pos­al of as­sets.

It al­so stat­ed that there was lack of over­sight by the Min­istry of Agri­cul­ture and fol­low-ups on mat­ters af­fect­ing the pro­bity of ac­tions of the ASTT, in­clud­ing un­law­ful pos­ses­sion of State lands, usurp­ing the role and au­thor­i­ty of ASTT’s sec­re­tary, in­tim­i­da­tion of pub­lic ser­vice staff and fail­ure by the so­ci­ety to abide by de­ci­sion and rec­om­men­da­tions of the per­ma­nent sec­re­tary in the Agri­cul­ture Min­istry.

Two au­dits con­duct­ed in 2012 by the min­istry In­ter­nal Au­dit Unit showed that ASTT’s ac­count­ing prac­tices were poor and lacked prop­er over­sight in the ex­pen­di­ture of funds.

It al­so stat­ed that in­ter­nal con­trols were weak and this ex­posed the or­gan­i­sa­tion to ma­te­r­i­al mis­state­ments in its fi­nal re­ports and the like­li­hood of er­ro­neous de­ci­sions and the “pos­si­bil­i­ty of mon­ey be­ing ma­nip­u­lat­ed for pri­vate gain.”

Some of the find­ings from the In­ter­nal Au­dit re­vealed:

Cheque pay­ments were is­sued with­out ver­i­fi­ca­tion of bank bal­ances, cash book was not bal­anced at the end of the work­day, de­posit slips did not agree with sub­scrip­tion cash book nor bank state­ment, cor­rec­tion flu­id and pen­cil mark­ings were preva­lent on ac­count­ing records, de­duc­tion made from cer­tain staff for ar­rears of salary was nev­er re­mit­ted to the Board of In­land Rev­enue.

To ex­er­cise some con­trol over the man­age­ment of funds at the ASTT, the per­ma­nent sec­re­tary and the ASTT signed a MOU in Jan­u­ary 2013 which set down spe­cif­ic pro­vi­sions for the use of pub­lic funds.

How­ev­er, the au­dit showed there was non-com­pli­ance with such MOU as funds con­tin­ued to be de­posit­ed in­to the ASTT’s reg­u­lar ac­count and not a sep­a­rate bank ac­count as re­quired.

“It was found that the ASTT pres­i­dent was paid a du­ty al­lowance of $6,500 per month con­trary to the MOU.”

The re­port point­ed out that the act gov­ern­ing the ASTT was out­dat­ed and de­fi­cient to fa­cil­i­tate ad­e­quate gov­er­nance and over­sight.

It was rec­om­mend­ed that the ASTT’s act be re­pealed and the min­istry im­me­di­ate­ly stops pay­ment of month­ly stipend to mem­bers of the Com­mit­tee of Man­age­ment and con­sid­er com­mis­sion­ing a foren­sic au­dit in­to the ASTT, giv­en the pletho­ra of al­le­ga­tions against them.

Pres­i­dent of the ASTT Dhano Sookoo in a tele­phone in­ter­view with Guardian Me­dia said hav­ing ex­am­ined the re­port she ob­served there was no sig­na­tures or names to the au­dit.

“All I am say­ing I don’t know if it is a valid doc­u­ment.”

She said no one from the Min­istry of Fi­nance vis­it­ed the ASTT’s of­fice or in­formed her that an au­dit was be­ing con­duct­ed.

How­ev­er, Sookoo said she re­ceived “a doc­u­ment” from the PS and has giv­en an un­der­tak­ing of a date for a re­sponse.

“I am go­ing to give my re­sponse with all the back­up doc­u­men­ta­tion that is in my pos­ses­sion.”

She said the Min­istry of Agri­cul­ture has been spend­ing the ASTT’s mon­ey.

Sookoo for­ward­ed a let­ter dat­ed No­vem­ber 2, ad­dressed to Ramb­harat which stat­ed that since mid-2013 to cur­rent, the min­istry took full con­trol over the ASTT’s an­nu­al bud­getary al­lo­ca­tion.

“Re­cent in­for­ma­tion dis­cov­ered through my lim­it­ed au­thor­i­ty notes that there has been on­go­ing fi­nan­cial dis­crep­an­cies and mis­ap­pro­pri­a­tion of the so­ci­ety’s funds at your min­istry,” the let­ter stat­ed.

“I am not a one-man team. The ASTT has a board and what­ev­er de­ci­sion is to be tak­en the board will take those de­ci­sions,” Sookoo de­fend­ed her po­si­tion.

Ramb­harat in a What­sapp mes­sage said the au­dit re­port was sent to the ASTT in the nor­mal course of things to get their com­ments and in par­tic­u­lar the re­sponse of of­fi­cers iden­ti­fied in the re­port.

“A dead­line for the ASTT’s re­sponse was giv­en by the PS. It is when those re­spons­es are re­ceived and con­sid­ered by the PS, the next step will be de­ter­mined. The au­dit re­port spec­i­fies that based on nu­mer­ous is­sues which came to my at­ten­tion and were passed to var­i­ous PSs in the min­istry to re­view and ad­vise me. I took the steps of re­quest­ing the au­dit. I am clear in my mind that there are is­sues to be ad­dressed in the ASTT and I have al­ways been ready to deal with those is­sues once the facts were known to me.”


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored