Senior Reporter
jesse.ramdeo@cnc3.co.tt
Opposition Leader Pennelope Beckles says the United National Congress (UNC) Government’s handling of rising unemployment and national security could come back to haunt it at the polls, arguing that thousands of job losses and unfulfilled promises are eroding public confidence.
Speaking during a media briefing in Port-of-Spain yesterday, Beckles said citizens would remember the Government’s performance when they next cast their ballots, pointing to the upcoming local government elections.
“I hope you, the people of Trinidad and Tobago, will remember what this Prime Minister and what this UNC Government thinks of you,” Beckles said.
Her comments came as she challenged Government claims that the loss of nearly 6,000 jobs in the first quarter of 2026 reflected nothing more than seasonal employment trends.
Citing Central Statistical Office (CSO) data, Beckles said employment fell by 5,900 between the fourth quarter of 2025 and the first quarter of 2026, while the unemployment rate rose from 4.3 per cent to 5.4 per cent. She said women bore the brunt of the decline, with female employment falling by 6,800 and female unemployment increasing from 12,500 to 18,000.
Beckles rejected Minister of Planning, Economic Affairs and Development Kennedy Swaratsingh’s explanation that the figures reflected a normal post-Christmas slowdown.
Instead, she pointed to widespread job losses across several industries, including petroleum and gas, transportation, construction, electricity and water, agriculture and community services.
She also cited CSO data covering June 2025 to March 2026, which she said showed thousands more jobs lost across key sectors, including 7,100 in petroleum and gas, 9,100 in construction and 14,800 in community, social and personal services.
Beckles questioned Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar’s recent claim that the Government had created more than 15,000 jobs between April 2025 and April 2026.
“I want to ask the Prime Minister whether she stands by the figures they have produced,” Beckles said.
She also reminded the public that the UNC had campaigned on a promise of creating 50,000 jobs.
“The biggest cries following the election were jobs, jobs, jobs,” she said, adding that requests for employment remain the most common issue raised at constituency offices.
She also condemned comments by Persad-Bissessar linking job losses to the dismantling of what she described as state-funded “ghost programmes” and criminal enterprises.
The Prime Minister had argued that some job losses resulted from the closure of businesses tied to drug trafficking and the elimination of social programmes plagued by corruption.
However, Beckles yesterday accused the Prime Minister of branding ordinary citizens as “ghosts,” “freeness” recipients and criminals.
“I am only hoping that the women of T&T in particular, the ones who are suffering more than anybody else, are listening to what this Prime Minister is calling the citizens of Trinidad and Tobago,” she said.
Beckles also linked the employment concerns to uncertainty surrounding the future of the Hilton Trinidad, warning that as many as 300 workers could lose their jobs if the hotel’s lease is not renewed.
She called on the Prime Minister and Trade Minister to explain the status of lease negotiations, saying employees had been told the hotel could close within weeks if an agreement is not reached.
On national security, Beckles maintained that Government’s rollout of joint police and military security posts amounted to introducing elements of the former Zones of Special Operations (ZOSO) programme “through the back door.”
She pointed to recent public comments by Homeland Security Minister Roger Alexander, acknowledging that aspects of the anti-crime plan would draw on the proposed ZOSO framework, despite Defence Minister Wayne Sturge insisting the initiative was not ZOSO.
“We are very clear of our willingness to work with the Government,” Beckles said, noting that the Opposition had previously proposed amendments to the ZOSO legislation rather than opposing it outright.
She also questioned whether the Government had delivered measurable improvements in crime, saying it could not simply “mark itself” on its own performance.
