Senior Reporter
jensen.lavende@guardian.co.tt
The recently appointed head of the Strategic Services Agency (SSA) Arthur Barrington was fired on Friday. A media release from the Attorney General’s office yesterday said Cabinet revoked his appointment.
Barrington, a former police officer, took up duties on April 1. He was appointed by former prime minister Stuart Young who said Barrington would provide much-needed stability in the SSA.
He replaced Ambassador Anthony Phillips-Spencer who was brought in last year to clean up the SSA following the dismissal of Major Roger Best.
Best, who was seen at a UNC rally in south in the lead up to the general election, was fired after being detained and questioned by the police.
He was never charged for any offence but, three SSA employees—Pastor Ian Brown, Sgt Sherwin Waldron and Susan Portell-Griffith—were charged for the unauthorised transfer of prohibited firearms from the T&T Police Service (TTPS) to the SSA. Charges against the trio were dismissed earlier this year.
Contacted for comment, Barrington said he did not have much to say.
Asked if he was told about his dismissal before the media release was sent out, he said: “If that’s what you’re saying is true, I have absolutely no comment. You cannot expect me to comment on that. I cannot give you any word on that at all. I’m not playing coy with you.”
Homeland Security Minister Roger Alexander was also contacted but said he was at a Mother’s Day function.
Last July, then-prime minister Dr Keith Rowley read into Hansard a statement on the audit conducted by Phillips-Spencer, which revealed that under Best’s leadership, the SSA had amassed military-grade weapons and ammunition, operating a highly trained and militarised Tactical Response Unit.
The audit also uncovered alleged practices of nepotism, with a concentration of members from one church being hired by the intelligence agency.
“Such persons belonged to a cult which was arming itself while preaching a doctrine for trained military and paramilitary personnel with a religious calling to be the most suitable persons to replace the country’s political leadership,” Dr Rowley said.
“They were exerting high levels of influence on the affairs of the agency to the detriment of national security.”