Jensen La Vende
Senior Reporter
jensen.lavende@guardian.co.tt
The Archdiocese of Port-of-Spain yesterday said it was not going to comment on a lawsuit brought against it by five men, as the matter is now before the courts.
In a media release, the archdiocese said that while it acknowledged the media reports concerning St Dominic’s Home, because the matter is sub judice, it was not going to comment.
“We understand the concern this has raised within the community and recognise that matters of this nature require the utmost sensitivity. However, as the issue is currently before the courts, we are unable to provide further comment at this time. We remain confident in the judicial process to bring clarity and justice,” the release said.
The men accused the State of failing to protect them against sexual and physical abuse at a children’s home in Belmont decades ago and have filed a lawsuit suing the Roman Catholic Church and the State.
In a lawsuit filed on October 8, the men are suing the St Dominic’s Children’s Home (also referred to as the Belmont Orphanage), the Roman Catholic Archdiocese in Port-of-Spain, the Attorney General, the Statutory Authorities Service Commission, and a former employee at the children’s home who was later charged with buggery, attempted buggery and serious indecency.
The filing of the lawsuit comes after the men issued pre-action protocol letters in 2022, seeking at the time some $2.5 million for six alleged victims. Then attorney Gregory Delzin, now a senior counsel, said the lawsuit was filed outside the legal limit as allowed under the Limitation of Certain Actions Act.
According to the Act, a claim must be made within four years of the alleged offence. The lawsuit said the offences are alleged to have occurred between 1986 and 2005.
Attorneys Christlyn Moore, Joshua Hamlet and Adanna Joseph-Wallace are representing the men and must convince Justice Carol Gobin to accept their position that an exception to the limitation is needed before the lawsuit is adjudicated, in accordance with Section 9 of the Act. The matter comes up for hearing on Monday.
