JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, May 28, 2025

Collapse of major dam in southern Ukraine triggers emergency as Moscow and Kyiv blame each other

by

722 days ago
20230606
This satellite image provided by Maxar Technologies shows an overview of the Kakhovka dam in southern Ukraine on Monday, June 5, 2023. Ukraine on Tuesday, June 6, accused Russian forces of blowing up the major dam and hydroelectric power station in a part of southern Ukraine they control, threatening a massive flood that could displace hundreds of thousands of people, and ordered residents downriver to evacuate. Russian news agency Tass quoted an unspecified Russian government official as saying the dam had “collapsed” due to damage. (Maxar Technologies via AP)

This satellite image provided by Maxar Technologies shows an overview of the Kakhovka dam in southern Ukraine on Monday, June 5, 2023. Ukraine on Tuesday, June 6, accused Russian forces of blowing up the major dam and hydroelectric power station in a part of southern Ukraine they control, threatening a massive flood that could displace hundreds of thousands of people, and ordered residents downriver to evacuate. Russian news agency Tass quoted an unspecified Russian government official as saying the dam had “collapsed” due to damage. (Maxar Technologies via AP)

The wall of a ma­jor dam in south­ern Ukraine col­lapsed Tues­day, trig­ger­ing floods, en­dan­ger­ing Eu­rope’s largest nu­clear pow­er plant and threat­en­ing drink­ing wa­ter sup­plies as both sides in the war scram­bled to evac­u­ate res­i­dents and blamed each oth­er for the de­struc­tion.

Ukraine ac­cused Russ­ian forces of blow­ing up the Kakhov­ka dam and hy­dro­elec­tric pow­er sta­tion on the Dnieper Riv­er in an area that Moscow con­trols, while Russ­ian of­fi­cials blamed Ukrain­ian bom­bard­ment in the con­test­ed area. It was not pos­si­ble to ver­i­fy the claims.

The po­ten­tial­ly far-reach­ing en­vi­ron­men­tal and so­cial con­se­quences of the dis­as­ter quick­ly be­came clear as homes, streets and busi­ness­es flood­ed down­stream and emer­gency crews be­gan evac­u­a­tions; of­fi­cials raced to check cool­ing sys­tems at the Za­por­izhzhia Nu­clear Pow­er Plant; and au­thor­i­ties ex­pressed con­cern about sup­plies of drink­ing wa­ter to the south in Crimea, which Rus­sia il­le­gal­ly an­nexed in 2014.

Both Russ­ian and Ukrain­ian au­thor­i­ties brought in trains and bus­es for res­i­dents. About 22,000 peo­ple live in ar­eas at risk of flood­ing in Russ­ian-con­trolled ar­eas, while 16,000 live in the most crit­i­cal zone in Ukrain­ian-held ter­ri­to­ry, ac­cord­ing to of­fi­cial tal­lies. Nei­ther side re­port­ed any deaths or in­juries.

The dam break added a stun­ning new di­men­sion to Rus­sia’s war in Ukraine, now in its 16th month. Ukrain­ian forces were wide­ly seen to be mov­ing for­ward with a long-an­tic­i­pat­ed coun­terof­fen­sive in patch­es along more than 1,000 kilo­me­tres (621 miles) of front line in the east and south.

It was not im­me­di­ate­ly clear whether ei­ther side ben­e­fits from the dam­age to the dam, since both Russ­ian-con­trolled and Ukrain­ian-held lands are at risk. The dam­age could al­so hin­der Ukraine’s coun­terof­fen­sive in the south and dis­tract its gov­ern­ment, while Rus­sia de­pends on the dam to sup­ply wa­ter to Crimea.

Al­though Kyiv of­fi­cials claimed Rus­sia blew up the dam to hin­der the coun­terof­fen­sive, ob­servers note that cross­ing the broad Dnieper would be ex­treme­ly chal­leng­ing for the Ukrain­ian mil­i­tary. Oth­er sec­tors of the front line are more like­ly av­enues of at­tack, an­a­lysts say.

Even so, Nigel Gould-Davies, a se­nior fel­low for Rus­sia and Eura­sia at the In­ter­na­tion­al In­sti­tute for Strate­gic Stud­ies, said the al­leged Russ­ian de­struc­tion of the dam “be­trays a lack of con­fi­dence, a lack of con­fi­dence, a pro­found­ly de­fen­sive mea­sure, the lack of con­fi­dence in Rus­sia’s longer-term prospects” in the war.

Ex­perts have pre­vi­ous­ly said the dam was in dis­re­pair, which could al­so have led to the breach. David Helms, a re­tired Amer­i­can sci­en­tist who has mon­i­tored the reser­voir since the start of the war, said in an email that it wasn’t clear if the dam­age was de­lib­er­ate or sim­ple ne­glect from Russ­ian forces oc­cu­py­ing the fa­cil­i­ty.

But Helms al­so not­ed a Russ­ian his­to­ry of at­tack­ing dams.

Au­thor­i­ties, ex­perts and res­i­dents have ex­pressed con­cern for months about wa­ter flows through — and over — the Kakhov­ka dam. Af­ter heavy rains and snow melt last month, wa­ter lev­els rose be­yond nor­mal lev­els, flood­ing near­by vil­lages. Satel­lite im­ages showed wa­ter wash­ing over dam­aged sluice gates.

Amid of­fi­cial out­rage, Ukrain­ian Pres­i­dent Volodymyr Ze­len­skyy said he con­vened an ur­gent meet­ing of the Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Coun­cil. He al­leged Russ­ian forces set off a blast in­side the dam struc­ture at 2:50 a.m. (2350 GMT Mon­day) and said about 80 set­tle­ments were in dan­ger. Ze­len­skyy said in Oc­to­ber his gov­ern­ment had in­for­ma­tion that Rus­sia had mined the dam and pow­er plant.

But Krem­lin spokesman Dmit­ry Peskov called it “a de­lib­er­ate act of sab­o­tage by the Ukrain­ian side … aimed at cut­ting wa­ter sup­plies to Crimea.”

Both sides warned of a loom­ing en­vi­ron­men­tal dis­as­ter. Ukraine’s Pres­i­den­tial Of­fice said some 150 met­ric tons of oil es­caped from the dam ma­chin­ery and that an­oth­er 300 met­ric tons could still leak out.

An­driy Yer­mak, the head of Ukraine’s Pres­i­dent’s Of­fice, post­ed a video show­ing swans swim­ming near an ad­min­is­tra­tive build­ing in the flood­ed streets of Russ­ian-oc­cu­pied No­va Kakhov­ka, a city in the Kher­son re­gion where some 45,000 peo­ple lived be­fore the war. Oth­er footage he post­ed showed flood wa­ters reach­ing the sec­ond floor of the build­ing.

Ukraine’s In­te­ri­or Min­istry urged res­i­dents of 10 vil­lages on the Dnieper’s right bank and parts of the city of Kher­son down­riv­er to gath­er es­sen­tial doc­u­ments and pets, turn off ap­pli­ances, and leave, while cau­tion­ing against pos­si­ble dis­in­for­ma­tion.

The Russ­ian-in­stalled may­or of oc­cu­pied No­va Kakhov­ka, Vladimir Leon­tyev, said it was be­ing evac­u­at­ed as wa­ter poured in­to the city.

Ukraine’s nu­clear op­er­a­tor En­er­goatom said via Telegram that the dam­age to the dam “could have neg­a­tive con­se­quences” for the Za­por­izhzhia Nu­clear Pow­er Plant, which is Eu­rope’s biggest, but wrote that for now the sit­u­a­tion is “con­trol­lable.”

The U.N.’s In­ter­na­tion­al Atom­ic En­er­gy Agency said there was “no im­me­di­ate risk to the safe­ty of the plant,” which re­quires wa­ter for its cool­ing sys­tem. It said that IAEA staff on site have been told the dam lev­el is falling by 5 cen­time­ters (2 inch­es) an hour. At that rate, the sup­ply from the reser­voir should last a few days, it said.

The plant al­so has al­ter­na­tive sources of wa­ter, in­clud­ing a large cool­ing pond than can pro­vide wa­ter “for some months,” the state­ment said.

Ukrain­ian au­thor­i­ties have pre­vi­ous­ly warned that the dam’s fail­ure could un­leash 18 mil­lion cu­bic me­ters (4.8 bil­lion gal­lons) of wa­ter and flood Kher­son and dozens of oth­er ar­eas where thou­sands of peo­ple live.

The World Da­ta Cen­ter for Geoin­for­mat­ics and Sus­tain­able De­vel­op­ment, a Ukrain­ian non­govern­men­tal or­ga­ni­za­tion, es­ti­mat­ed that near­ly 100 vil­lages and towns would be flood­ed. It al­so reck­oned that the wa­ter lev­el would start drop­ping on­ly af­ter five-sev­en days.

A to­tal col­lapse in the dam would wash away much of the broad riv­er’s left bank, ac­cord­ing to the Ukraine War En­vi­ron­men­tal Con­se­quences Work­ing Group, an or­ga­ni­za­tion of en­vi­ron­men­tal ac­tivists and ex­perts doc­u­ment­ing the war’s en­vi­ron­men­tal ef­fects.

Mykhai­lo Podolyak, a se­nior ad­vis­er to Pres­i­dent Volodymyr Ze­len­skyy, said that “a glob­al eco­log­i­cal dis­as­ter is play­ing out now, on­line, and thou­sands of an­i­mals and ecosys­tems will be de­stroyed in the next few hours.”

Video post­ed on­line showed flood­wa­ters in­un­dat­ing a long road­way; an­oth­er showed a beaver scur­ry­ing for high ground from ris­ing wa­ters.

The in­ci­dent al­so drew in­ter­na­tion­al con­dem­na­tion, in­clud­ing from Ger­man Chan­cel­lor Olaf Scholz and NA­TO Sec­re­tary-Gen­er­al Jens Stoltenberg, who said the “out­ra­geous act … demon­strates once again the bru­tal­i­ty of Rus­sia’s war in Ukraine.”

Ukraine con­trols five of the six dams along the Dnieper, which runs from its north­ern bor­der with Be­larus down to the Black Sea and is cru­cial for the coun­try’s drink­ing wa­ter and pow­er sup­ply.

Ukraine’s state hy­dro pow­er gen­er­at­ing com­pa­ny wrote in a state­ment that “The sta­tion can­not be re­stored.” Ukrhy­droen­er­go al­so claimed Rus­sia blew up the sta­tion from in­side the en­gine room.

Leon­tyev, the Russ­ian-ap­point­ed may­or, said nu­mer­ous Ukrain­ian strikes on the Kakhov­ka hy­dro­elec­tric plant de­stroyed its valves, and “wa­ter from the Kakhov­ka reser­voir be­gan to un­con­trol­lably flow down­stream.”

Leon­tyev added that dam­age to the sta­tion was be­yond re­pair, and it would have to be re­built.

Ukraine and Rus­sia have pre­vi­ous­ly ac­cused each oth­er of tar­get­ing the dam with at­tacks.

As­so­ci­at­ed Press writer Dan­i­ca Kir­ka in Lon­don con­tributed.

KYIV, Ukraine (AP) —

UkraineInstagramInternational


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored