JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, July 28, 2025

CoP reviewing Beyond the Tape programme

by

Gail Alexander
543 days ago
20240201

Se­nior Po­lit­i­cal Re­porter

The Be­yond the Tape pro­gramme is be­ing re­viewed, as the T&T Po­lice Ser­vice is dis­sat­is­fied with the pro­duc­tion—and there may be times when the show’s pre­sen­ter is a bit averse to the thoughts of the or­gan­i­sa­tion, says Com­mis­sion­er of Po­lice Er­la Hare­wood-Christo­pher.

And CoP Hare­wood-Christo­pher has al­so been ad­vised by Par­lia­ment’s Joint Se­lect Com­mit­tee on Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty to charge busi­ness­es that sell unau­tho­rised “po­lice” wear—and al­so charge po­lice of­fi­cers who don’t wear body cam­eras.

These were among de­vel­op­ments at yes­ter­day’s Joint Se­lect Com­mit­tee (JSC) in­quiry with TTPS top brass.

JSC mem­ber Dr Paul Richards asked if there was a par­tic­u­lar man­date for the “Be­yond the Tape Show” that’s co-host­ed by act­ing se­nior su­per­in­ten­dent (Port-of-Spain Di­vi­sion) Roger Alexan­der. Richards said he had asked since, “very of­ten, I hear ut­ter­ances on that show that are in stark con­tra­dic­tion to what the po­lice lead­er­ship is say­ing.”

“It’s very sur­pris­ing. The po­lice lead­er­ship says one thing about gangs—the show is say­ing ‘we giv­ing the gangs a bligh’. Is there a man­date for the show and does it take in­struc­tion, pol­i­cy and pub­lic dis­sem­i­na­tion from the po­lice lead­er­ship? Be­cause every of­ten I’ve heard con­tra­dic­to­ry in­for­ma­tion from the po­lice lead­er­ship than to what I see on that show—and I don’t know which one to be­lieve,” Richards said.

Hare­wood-Christo­pher re­spond­ed, “The show should be a repli­ca of the thoughts and sen­ti­ments of the or­gan­i­sa­tion’s ex­ec­u­tive.”

Richards asked if that was hap­pen­ing.

The CoP said, “There may be at times when the pre­sen­ter is a bit ... averse to the thoughts of the or­gan­i­sa­tion.”

Richards in­ter­ject­ed, “The pre­sen­ter rep­re­sent­ing the TTPS on a na­tion­al broad­cast­ed very pop­u­lar show, in uni­form, and you’re telling us he is ‘averse’ to what the lead­er­ship is say­ing? That is a shock­ing rev­e­la­tion!”

Richards asked if she—as TTPS head—was sat­is­fied with what was com­ing out of the show.

Hare­wood-Christo­pher said, “At this time—no ... and ac­tu­al­ly the show is be­ing re­viewed. We’ve had dis­cus­sions.”

On crim­i­nal el­e­ments us­ing cloth­ing that ap­pear to be TTPS uni­form or ve­hi­cles with blue lights and sirens like TTPS ve­hi­cles, Hare­wood-Christo­pher said the TTPS had not­ed the sit­u­a­tion. She said it’s one of the av­enues in­to which the TTPS seeks to man­age and put some con­trol, and re­quest that po­lice of­fi­cers use their of­fi­cial grey and blue po­lice uni­form and ID badges; and to ap­point as nec­es­sary, the use of the op­er­a­tional wear.

“The op­er­a­tional wear is avail­able at some of our stores. What we need to do, that will be at the Gov­ern­ment lev­el: to put sanc­tions in place to con­trol the sale of these items,” she said.

JSC chair­man Kei­th Scot­land, said, “Madame Com­mis­sion­er, I’m cer­tain that op­er­a­tional wear is out­lawed. You can­not have cam­ou­flage or the wear of the pro­tec­tive ser­vices un­less au­tho­rised. So you don’t need any in­ter­ven­tion—charge! If there’s a chal­lenge, that’s why you have a judge and a mag­is­trate!”

Scot­land added, “Charge! Got to the stores, charge! Let the mag­is­trate and the judge de­cide. But the law is there to be im­ple­ment­ed. You’ll not be judge and ju­ry, you’re the pros­e­cu­tor.”

Scot­land ad­vised her that Sec­tion 62 of the Po­lice Ser­vice Act deals with cul­prits us­ing TTPS uni­form/gear and/or pre­tend­ing to be of­fi­cers. He said the penal­ty of $30,000 or three years in jail ought to be aug­ment­ed, but that’s a mat­ter for Par­lia­ment.

Scot­land added, “For now, you have the law that gives you the pow­er to charge. Once you know of these stores, wher­ev­er they may be sell­ing these items, go to them with your team and be ro­bust in pros­e­cu­tion.”


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored