Senior Reporter
shane.superville@guardian.co.tt
The relatives of a Cunupia man who was killed by police are questioning the circumstances under which he was shot, as they claim he acted as a caretaker for the property and was not armed at the time of his death.
According to an official T&T Police Service (TTPS) media release yesterday, Abdullah Joseph, 34, was shot and killed by officers of the Central Division after officers responded to a report of a “man on premises” at an undisclosed address in Cunupia.
The officers reported that after identifying themselves, they entered the property where they found the man with a gun whom they said “engaged them.” The officers shot and killed the man.
In the media release, Police Commissioner Allister Guevarro said the incident was a warning to criminals who sought to terrorise communities.
“If you choose to arm yourselves, invade the homes of others, and confront law enforcement, you will face the full weight of the TTPS. Our officers will act decisively, lawfully and without hesitation to protect life, property and the safety of every community across Trinidad and Tobago,” Guevarro said.
“Home invasions are not crimes of opportunity and will be treated as calculated acts of violence, geared towards terrorising law-abiding citizens.”
Guardian Media visited Petersville, Cunupia, and spoke with the relatives of Joseph, who confirmed he was the one killed by police.
They, however, dismissed the report of the reason put forward by police, as they claim Joseph slept at the property with the permission of the homeowners, who lived abroad.
The relative, who asked not to be named, also admitted that while Joseph was arrested in the past for the possession of drugs and dealt with drug use in his personal life, he did not believe he was involved in a home invasion or was in possession of a gun, as reported by the police.
“It’s not a home invasion, there are neighbours right around there who heard him identify himself as Abdullah Joseph and even his father’s name, he even called the name of the person who allowed him to sleep there.
“Right now, what they (the police) are talking about... they are trying to cover themselves. They could have locked him up and shot him in his foot or take him to court and let the court settle it. How they emptied all those bullets on him, it come like they murder him.
“He never have no gun on him, all he does have is his little drugs. He doesn’t give anybody any trouble, if somebody wants something, he will go in the garden, pick it and they will give him some food for him to eat.”
The relative pointed to the garage where bloodstains were visible on the floor, noting that was where Joseph slept.
He said Joseph supported himself by working in a parcel of agricultural land owned by his brother and also maintained the grounds of the property where he was killed for the owners.
Responding to Guardian Media’s questions via email yesterday, the Police Complaints Authority (PCA) confirmed they were investigating the matter.
Asked if the incident strengthened the case for the PCA’s call for body cameras, they noted that such devices would enhance law enforcement capabilities.
“The PCA has consistently supported measures that enhance transparency, accountability and public confidence in policing.
“The availability of body worn camera footage can assist investigators by providing an objective record of police-citizen interactions and may help to clarify disputed accounts of incidents.
“The authority, therefore, continues to view the timely implementation of body worn cameras as a necessary accountability measure within modern policing.”
The PCA reported that as of May 20, there have been 20 incidents of fatal police-involved shootings which had led to 18 people being killed.
