JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, July 26, 2025

Curepe residents: Govt using stonewalling tactics

by

Charles Kong Soo
2498 days ago
20180923
ROHAN SINANAN

ROHAN SINANAN

ANISTO ALVES

Charles Kong Soo

The dis­af­fect­ed res­i­dents who were served evic­tion no­tices over the planned de­vel­op­ment of the Curepe in­ter­change say the Gov­ern­ment is us­ing de­lay­ing tac­tics to frus­trate them con­cern­ing the ac­qui­si­tion of their land.

Speak­ing to the Sun­day Guardian yes­ter­day, spokesman for the res­i­dents, Ru­di Singh said, “Since we got a let­ter from Gov­ern­ment to va­cate, as they say, it was not an evic­tion let­ter, but we have to move in 15 days. Sub­se­quent to that, we had a meet­ing with Works Min­is­ter Ro­han Sinanan at his of­fice in Port-of-Spain on Sep­tem­ber 13, they said they were not go­ing to forcibly put us out, they will wait un­til the process goes through or un­til the Sec­tion 4 no­tice ex­pires in No­vem­ber."

The Min­istry said the Land Ac­qui­si­tion Act con­sist­ed of a two-step process that en­tailed serv­ing a Sec­tion 3 no­tice of in­tend­ed ac­qui­si­tion, fol­lowed by a Sec­tion 4 or­der which em­pow­ered the State to en­ter and take pos­ses­sion of the prop­er­ties with­in six months of serv­ing the no­tice.

He said no ne­go­ti­a­tions were held since the res­i­dents' lawyers sent the min­istry a let­ter. The min­istry's lawyers re­spond­ed on Sep­tem­ber 18 that they still were not com­plet­ed with the in­struc­tions from their client, the Gov­ern­ment. Once the rel­e­vant in­for­ma­tion is pro­vid­ed, they said, they will re­ply on Sep­tem­ber 21. To date, there has been no re­sponse.

Singh said they al­so want­ed to know who on the Gov­ern­ment side had promised the res­i­dents' land, what time pe­ri­od and lo­ca­tion. He said, how­ev­er, that was a sec­ondary is­sue. The pri­ma­ry is­sue was the ne­go­ti­a­tions con­cern­ing the ac­qui­si­tion of the land.

Singh said min­istry of­fi­cials al­ways said the land is­sue was some­thing to ac­com­mo­date the res­i­dents and would be done sep­a­rate­ly.

Singh said it seemed to the res­i­dents that Gov­ern­ment was de­lay­ing the whole process to force an is­sue of evict­ing the res­i­dents when Sec­tion 4 ex­pired in No­vem­ber.

He said they ver­bal­ly com­mu­ni­cat­ed to Sinanan and Di­rec­tor of High­ways Navin Ram­s­ingh at the meet­ing to put their of­fer in writ­ing.

Singh said Gov­ern­ment's stonewalling tac­tics made it look like res­i­dents were not mov­ing for­ward or do­ing any­thing.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored