JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, July 26, 2025

Ex-MP queries ‘illegal’ UNC posts

by

1770 days ago
20200920

For­mer UNC MP Ra­mona Ram­di­al has called out the op­po­si­tion on the le­git­i­ma­cy of its na­tion­al ex­ec­u­tive. She has queried the fact that gen­er­al sec­re­tary Dave Tan­coo and PRO Ani­ta Haynes have re­tained their par­ty posts de­spite be­ing MPs. Ram­di­al said the re­ten­tion of the par­ty posts by the MPs is con­trary to UNC’s con­sti­tu­tion

Ram­di­al, the for­mer Cou­va North MP, made the call in a re­cent let­ter to par­ty chair­man Pe­ter Kan­hai. In re­cent times she has been crit­i­cal of the UNC’s gen­er­al elec­tion cam­paign and the par­ty’s lead­er­ship.

In the let­ter to Kan­hai, she said: “As a mem­ber of the Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress I write to raise with you and to get your re­sponse on a mat­ter of ut­most im­por­tance to the par­ty and, by ex­ten­sion our mem­ber­ship.

“In do­ing so I be­lieve it ap­pro­pri­ate to draw your at­ten­tion to Ar­ti­cle 2 (vii) of the Par­ty’s Con­sti­tu­tion (“the Con­sti­tu­tion”) which voic­es the Par­ty’s com­mit­ment ‘To strug­gle against any ten­den­cy to­wards au­thor­i­tar­i­an­ism, au­toc­ra­cy and dic­ta­tor­ship and to pro­mote a vi­able dif­fu­sion of cen­tres of pow­er and de­ci­sion-mak­ing as a check against the con­cen­tra­tion and abuse of pow­er’.”

She added: “I be­lieve it is the above com­mit­ment to the ‘strug­gle against any ten­den­cy to­wards au­thor­i­tar­i­an­ism, au­toc­ra­cy and dic­ta­tor­ship’ that guid­ed the founders of the par­ty to struc­ture gov­er­nance of the par­ty in the way they did and in do­ing so they sought ‘to pro­mote a vi­able dif­fu­sion of cen­tres of pow­er and de­ci­sion mak­ing” where­by:

a) Un­der Ar­ti­cle 18 of the Con­sti­tu­tion the term of the Par­ty’s Na­tion­al Ex­ec­u­tive (“NA­TEX”) is lim­it­ed to two (2) years and the term of the Po­lit­i­cal Leader is lim­it­ed a dif­fer­ent term of three (3) years; and

b) Un­der Ar­ti­cle 12 (A)(iv)(d), which sets up the Par­ty’s Ad­min­is­tra­tive Sec­re­tari­at which in­cludes the Par­ty’s Gen­er­al Sec­re­tary and Pub­lic Re­la­tions Of­fi­cer, the Con­sti­tu­tion man­dates that “...a mem­ber of Par­lia­ment shall not be el­i­gi­ble to be ap­point­ed to an of­fice with­in the Sec­re­tari­at.”

Ram­di­al said: “A num­ber of se­ri­ous con­cerns arise from the above pro­vi­sions of our Con­sti­tu­tion.”

She said these are as fol­lows:

• Though the last elec­tion of of­fi­cers of the NA­TEX was on No­vem­ber 27, 2017, the of­fi­cers elect­ed then, in­clud­ing the chair­man have (ap­par­ent­ly il­le­git­i­mate­ly) held on to of­fice well be­yond two years there­by vi­o­lat­ing the Par­ty’s Con­sti­tu­tion;

• While the par­ty’s Gen­er­al Sec­re­tary, Dave Tan­coo, was elect­ed as a Mem­ber of Par­lia­ment at the Au­gust 10, 2020, gen­er­al elec­tion he has held on to his par­ty of­fice in vi­o­la­tion of the Con­sti­tu­tion;

• While par­ty’s Pub­lic Re­la­tions Of­fi­cer, Ani­ta Haynes, was al­so elect­ed as a Mem­ber of Par­lia­ment at the gen­er­al elec­tion she too has al­so held on to her par­ty of­fice in vi­o­la­tion of the Con­sti­tu­tion.

“It goes with­out say­ing, chair­man, that the above vi­o­la­tions by you, the NA­TEX, the Gen­er­al Sec­re­tary and the Pub­lic Re­la­tions Of­fi­cer do not au­gur well for, and may even re­flect neg­a­tive­ly up­on our par­ty and its of­fi­cers, bear­ing in mind that the par­ty seeks to hold it­self out to the na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty as ger­mi­na­tion ground for a gov­ern­ment in wait­ing.

“With the above con­cerns in mind I ask that the Par­ty moves prompt­ly to cor­rect the above vi­o­la­tions of the Con­sti­tu­tion by tak­ing ap­pro­pri­ate ac­tion that can with­stand scruti­ny both with­in the par­ty and in the eyes of all,” Ram­di­al said.

“As I end I be­lieve it ap­pro­pri­ate to state that at all times our col­lec­tive ac­tions must be guid­ed by our Par­ty’s mot­to un­der the Con­sti­tu­tion, name­ly: WE ARE THE FU­TURE.”

Kan­hai and Tan­coo have no re­spond­ed to calls for com­ment.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored