JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, July 27, 2025

Fired TTPS workers want lumpsum payout for remainder of contracts

by

Shaliza Hassanali
1369 days ago
20211026
Police Service Administration Building in Port-of-Spain.

Police Service Administration Building in Port-of-Spain.

Hours af­ter 15 con­tract­ed work­ers of the T&T Po­lice Ser­vice (TTPS) was ter­mi­nat­ed, they are now de­mand­ing that they be paid a lump sum for the re­main­der of their con­tracts which could amount to mil­lions of dol­lars.

Yes­ter­day, they said are yet to be told how the fi­nan­cial re­mu­ner­a­tion for the re­main­der of their con­tracts will be ho­n­oured, as no terms and con­di­tions were out­lined.

On Mon­day, the 15 con­tract­ed work­ers, who were all hired by for­mer Com­mis­sion­er of Po­lice Gary Grif­fith, were hand­ed their ter­mi­na­tion let­ters by Deputy Com­mis­sion­er of Po­lice Mc­Don­ald Ja­cob.

Four oth­er peo­ple who worked with the TTPS were al­so re­lieved of their du­ties with im­me­di­ate ef­fect.

Guardian Me­dia me­dia was al­so re­li­ably in­formed that two sec­re­taries and a grounds­man were al­so sent home.

The dis­missals came hours af­ter an Ex­press news­pa­per ar­ti­cle wrote about peo­ple hired by Grif­fith and the salaries they were earn­ing.

Ear­li­er this month Ja­cob was ap­point­ed ac­count­ing of­fi­cer, which fol­lowed the court rul­ing that the ap­point­ments of him­self as act­ing Com­mis­sion­er and that of Gary Grif­fith were un­con­sti­tu­tion­al.

Ja­cob in­sist­ed that the move to ter­mi­nate the work­ers was a cost-cut­ting ex­er­cise to chan­nel re­sources on the ground.

He said the sav­ings will run in­to mil­lions.

Among the 15 ter­mi­nat­ed were TTPS’ Cor­po­rate Com­mu­ni­ca­tion Man­ag­er Fran­cis Joseph, Events Man­ag­er Lisa Ghany and Paul Na­hous, con­sul­tant, firearms and am­mu­ni­tion au­dit im­ple­men­ta­tion and re­train­ing ser­vices.

On the heels of the fir­ing, for­mer po­lice Com­mis­sion­er Gary Grif­fith claimed there is “bla­tant po­lit­i­cal in­ter­fer­ence” in the run­ning of the TTPS.

Grif­fith cit­ed bud­getary cuts as a rea­son for this move as a “bo­gus ar­gu­ment” since on­ly the civil­ian staff hired by him are be­ing ter­mi­nat­ed and their con­tracts be­ing paid off, which meant that tax­pay­ers will be foot­ing a bill for no work.

The work­ers’ con­tracts are due to ex­pire in 2022 and 2023.

Five will ex­pire in 2023 with the re­main­ing ten ex­pir­ing next year.

The month­ly salary of the low­est-paid con­tract­ed work­er was $18,000 while the high­est was list­ed at $42,000.

One line in the ter­mi­na­tion let­ters, signed by Ja­cob stat­ed “you will be com­pen­sat­ed for the un­ex­pired pe­ri­od of your con­tract.”

In try­ing to make sense of the ter­mi­na­tion let­ter, one work­er said “the un­der­stand­ing is that we would be paid for what­ev­er is out­stand­ing on our con­tracts. That was part of the com­mu­ni­ca­tion. But to our sur­prise, no terms and con­di­tions were giv­en.”

Con­tact­ed yes­ter­day, Ghany said she was “still try­ing to make sense of it (let­ter) and un­der­stand what the terms and con­di­tions would be. Those did not seem clear from the ini­tial cor­re­spon­dence they were giv­en.”

An­oth­er af­fect­ed work­er, speak­ing on the con­di­tion of anonymi­ty told Guardian Me­dia “as of now we don’t know what is the pay­ment plan. Nor­mal­ly when you ter­mi­nate some­body in the let­ter of ter­mi­na­tion ex­plains a pay­ment plan....this was not in­clud­ed in our let­ters yes­ter­day.”

When he in­quired about the method of pay­ment from Ja­cob, the work­er said the Deputy Com­mis­sion­er said he would have to talk to the head of fi­nance to find out.

The TTPS’ HR de­part­ment al­so could not shed any light.

“They say they would have to ap­proach the Fi­nance Min­istry to get the mon­ey if they have to pay us in a lump sum.”

The ter­mi­nat­ed work­er said he pre­ferred to be paid all his mon­ey up­front for the re­main­der of his con­tract rather than to re­ceive a month­ly pay­ment un­til his con­tract ends in 2022.

“I told Mr Ja­cob I want to ap­ply for my NIS and I don’t want them to tell me that I am still be­ing paid by the TTPS be­cause when you ap­ply for NIS you have to be un­em­ployed. So if you give me all my mon­ey now I could go to the Na­tion­al In­sur­ance Board and ap­ply for my NIS. If you pay­ing me month­ly un­til Ju­ly of 2022 that means you are hold­ing me back.”

He es­ti­mat­ed his lump-sum pay­ment to be $195,000.

An­oth­er ter­mi­nat­ed work­er said he pre­ferred all his mon­ey in a big tranche.

“You see that al­lows me to move on. If I get paid every month it means that I will be still tied to the TTPS un­til my con­tract is up but I am not work­ing for them. If you pay me a lump sum I could cut my ties with the TTPS and I am on my own.”

Stat­ing that next Oc­to­ber, his con­tract will come to an end, he dis­agreed that the ter­mi­na­tion by Ja­cob was part of a cost-cut­ting mea­sure for the TTPS.

“Whether a lump sum is paid or not it can­not be a cost-cut­ting ex­er­cise be­cause you are still pay­ing us un­til the end of the con­tract. So where are you sav­ing mon­ey, in that? So that state­ment (by Ja­cob) that this move was to save is ab­solute­ly ridicu­lous. You are pay­ing the ter­mi­nat­ed em­ploy­ees un­til their con­tracts come to an end and you are not us­ing them. So you now have 19 peo­ple you are pay­ing to stay home when you could have used them to help the TTPS and just not re­new their con­tracts. This just does not make sense.”

The work­er es­ti­mat­ed his lump-sum pay­ment at $320,000

Re­peat­ed calls to DCP Ja­cob’s cell­phone yes­ter­day went unan­swered.

Fi­nance Min­istry clar­i­fies

cost of con­tracts

Yes­ter­day, a state­ment from the Fi­nance Min­istry sought to clar­i­fy the cost of the con­tract em­ploy­ment in the TTPS.

In re­al­i­ty, the re­lease stat­ed “as can been seen from the es­ti­mates of re­cur­rent ex­pen­di­ture un­der Item 02 – Goods and Ser­vices/001 – Po­lice Ser­vice (Trinidad)/16 – con­tract em­ploy­ment, the ac­tu­al ex­pen­di­ture on con­tract em­ploy­ment in the TTPS in 2016 was $61.6 mil­lion, down from $67.2 mil­lion in 2015.

“In fact, the ex­pen­di­ture on this item showed a down­ward trend from 2015 to 2018, from $67.2 mil­lion to $54.1 mil­lion. How­ev­er, ex­pen­di­ture on con­tract em­ploy­ment in the TTPS be­gan to in­crease af­ter 2018, ris­ing from $54.1 mil­lion in 2018 to $88.8 mil­lion in 2021, an in­crease of $34.7 mil­lion per year over the pe­ri­od 2018-2021,” the re­lease stat­ed.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored