JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, June 23, 2025

Fisherman questions oil spill compensation

by

Elizabeth Gonzales
20 days ago
20250603
Fisherman Edwin Ramkissoon questions the compensation he received after being affected by the 2024 oil spill.

Fisherman Edwin Ramkissoon questions the compensation he received after being affected by the 2024 oil spill.

Photo: Elizabeth Gonzales

Lam­beau fish­er­man Ed­win Ramkissoon says he lost every­thing in last year’s oil spill—his boat, en­gine, and gear—but was giv­en the same com­pen­sa­tion as fish­er­men who were bare­ly af­fect­ed.

Ramkissoon said his ves­sel Fish­er of Men was stuck in oil for days fol­low­ing the Feb­ru­ary 7, 2024 spill. He couldn’t fish, his en­gine stopped work­ing, and his gear was ru­ined.

But when cheques were dis­trib­uted last week, Ramkissoon was stunned to learn he re­ceived the same 40 per cent of claims, as oth­ers who were still able to go out to sea.

His 40 per cent gave him just over $60,000 in as­sis­tance. He claimed oth­ers re­ceived cheques of over $100,000 for their 40 per cent.

In 2024, the THA al­lo­cat­ed $2 mil­lion to as­sist af­fect­ed fish­er­men while they await­ed fi­nal ap­proval of their claims from the In­ter­na­tion­al Oil Pol­lu­tion Com­pen­sa­tion (IOPC) Fund.

But Ramkissoon felt this com­pen­sa­tion reeked of favouritism.

“Es­pe­cial­ly like for my case, I was bad­ly af­fect­ed. You’re sup­posed to deal with me dif­fer­ent­ly. That is what I thought they would have done, you un­der­stand? Be­cause oth­er fish­er­men was go­ing to sea. I could not go. Every day I com­ing down and watch­ing my boat in the oil … my boat could have be­come a swamp, be­cause I couldn’t go out to the boat,” he said.

Ramkissoon said he sub­mit­ted re­ceipts, quo­ta­tions, and years of fish­ing records—but no one ever vis­it­ed or called to ver­i­fy his claim.

He said he nor­mal­ly earns up to $40,000 a month and es­ti­mat­ed he lost more than $78,000 in equip­ment alone—ex­clud­ing his loss of earn­ings. The mon­ey he re­ceived, he said, felt like a dis­re­spect af­ter wait­ing for over a year for help.

“This $63,501.50 … I am not com­fort­able, not com­fort­able at all. This is dis­sat­is­fy­ing. I don’t like this at all. I talk in my mind and my heart. I’m not com­fort­able with this. For a fish­er­man who from Lam­beau on the beach and the oil come in and reach him, I not sup­pose to ac­cept this.”

Ramkissoon said he could on­ly use the help to re­pair the boat—but not re­place what was lost.

Ramkissoon has ap­pealed to the new En­er­gy Min­is­ter Dr Roodal Mooni­lal to re­view the sys­tem and give pri­or­i­ty to those who suf­fered the most.

“I just want some­body to say they un­der­stand. I just want to bounce back. I not beg­ging—I just want fair­ness.”


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored