JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, May 28, 2025

Georgia high court upholds dismissal of professors’ challenge to amendment allowing guns on campus

by

728 days ago
20230531

Geor­gia’s high­est court on Tues­day up­held a low­er court rul­ing dis­miss­ing a law­suit brought by five col­lege pro­fes­sors chal­leng­ing the re­moval of pub­lic col­leges and uni­ver­si­ties from a list of “school safe­ty zones” where weapons are pro­hib­it­ed.

Be­fore the 2017 amend­ment to state law, it was a mis­de­meanour crime to car­ry or pos­sess a weapon on prop­er­ty or in build­ings owned or leased by a col­lege or uni­ver­si­ty. The five Uni­ver­si­ty Sys­tem of Geor­gia pro­fes­sors who sued over the amend­ment said al­low­ing the car­ry­ing of weapons on cam­pus went against long­stand­ing uni­ver­si­ty sys­tem poli­cies.

They ar­gued the amend­ment was un­con­sti­tu­tion­al be­cause it in­fringed on the Board of Re­gents’ con­sti­tu­tion­al au­thor­i­ty to gov­ern, con­trol and man­age the uni­ver­si­ty sys­tem. The state filed a mo­tion to dis­miss the suit.

In a unan­i­mous de­ci­sion, Geor­gia Supreme Court Jus­tice John Elling­ton wrote that the com­plaint shows that the Board of Re­gents adopt­ed poli­cies on car­ry­ing guns that are con­sis­tent with the amend­ment. That makes the ques­tion of whether its au­thor­i­ty was usurped moot, he wrote.

The pro­fes­sors had ar­gued that there was a vi­o­la­tion of the sep­a­ra­tion of pow­ers that couldn’t be made moot by the fact that the Board of Re­gents bowed to or ap­proved the new pol­i­cy.

But the jus­tices dis­agreed.

“In de­ter­min­ing that this ac­tion by the Board moots the pro­fes­sors’ chal­lenge to the 2017 amend­ment, we do not con­cern our­selves with why the Board took this ac­tion,” the opin­ion says. “Here, what mat­ters is not why the Board adopt­ed the pol­i­cy in ques­tion, but mere­ly that it did so.”

AT­LANTA (AP) —

InstagramInternational


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored