Senior Political Reporter
Opposition Whip Marvin Gonzales is continuing his efforts to have his motion on Trinidad and Tobago’s water supply debated in Parliament, arguing that the issue has worsened since he first filed it in June.
He is also calling on House Speaker Jagdeo Singh to correct the parliamentary record after the motion failed to proceed to debate last Friday.
“I will not refile the motion. I’ll give the Speaker the opportunity to correct it,” Gonzales said yesterday.
During Friday’s sitting of the House of Representatives, Singh ruled that Gonzales had failed to formally move his motion on water supply disruptions because he did not say “I beg to move” at the end of his contribution. The Speaker cited what he described as a procedural lapse.
Gonzales, however, has challenged the ruling, arguing that it unfairly prevented the motion from advancing to debate.
In a letter to the Speaker this week, Gonzales requested that the “inaccuracy” on the parliamentary record be urgently corrected and that the motion be restored to the House’s Order Paper.
In support of his position, Gonzales noted that:
• Hansard records show he opened his contribution by stating: “Mr Speaker, I beg to move the following motion standing in my name.”
• When he attempted to repeat the words “I beg to move” at the end of his presentation, Singh stopped him, saying his allotted 45 minutes had expired.
• Erskine May’s Parliamentary Practice states: “A Member called to move a motion is expected in the course of their speech to move it formally and is deemed to have done so, whether or not they explicitly state that they do.”
• Singh previously allowed a 14-second overrun by the Minister of Foreign Affairs, commenting: “I think we could live with 14 seconds, right.” Gonzales said this raises questions about consistency in applying the Standing Orders and speaking-time limits.
Gonzales said yesterday that he has yet to receive a response from the Speaker.
“If I do not receive one, I’ll consider all lawful options available to me as an MP elected to represent the public’s interest. I also have a responsibility to protect the integrity of the parliamentary process. If I have to do it alone, I’m prepared,” he said.
He maintained that the motion is even more relevant now than when it was first filed.
“When I filed that motion in June, the water disruption problem was bad. The situation has become worse, with discoloured water in people’s taps all over Trinidad and Tobago,” Gonzales said.
“In the minister’s reply on Wednesday on water problems, he also alluded to challenges in clearing sediment. So I must act in the public’s interest.”
In his letter, Gonzales underscored the national importance of the issue.
“Citizens throughout Trinidad and Tobago are suffering from serious and recurring difficulties in accessing a reliable supply of water, including prolonged disruptions and dependence upon stored and truck-borne supplies,” he wrote, also referencing the effects of El Niño conditions.
He argued that the Speaker’s ruling prevented Parliament from debating an urgent national matter and denied citizens the opportunity to have their concerns addressed by the Government.
“The Hansard record establishes that the motion was moved. Accordingly, I formally request that you urgently rescind the inaccurate statement placed on the record that I failed to move the motion, reconsider the consequential ruling and immediately restore the motion to the Order Paper so that debate may resume at the earliest sitting of the House,” the letter stated.
The T&T Guardian emailed Parliament and contacted an official in the Speaker’s office for comment but received no response up to press time.
