JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Tuesday, July 29, 2025

Judge rules OWTU liable for US$4M loan to help with refinery bid

by

Derek Achong
24 days ago
20250705

The Oil­field Work­ers’ Trade Union (OW­TU) has been held li­able for over US$4 mil­lion in loans it se­cured for its bid to ac­quire Petrotrin’s Pointe-a-Pierre re­fin­ery af­ter it was closed, and the over­all com­pa­ny re­struc­tured in late 2018.

On Mon­day, High Court Judge Car­ol Gob­in up­held KCL Cap­i­tal Mar­ket Bro­kers Lim­it­ed’s case against the OW­TU and its as­so­ci­at­ed com­pa­ny Pa­tri­ot­ic En­er­gies and Tech­nolo­gies Lim­it­ed, which was es­tab­lished to aid in its bid for the re­fin­ery.

The loan cen­tred around two agree­ments en­tered in­to be­tween KCL Cap­i­tal and the OTWU, through its then-trustees Ozzi War­wick, Ray­mond Hug­gins, and Ernesto Ke­sar, be­tween No­vem­ber 2019 and May 2020.

Ke­sar, the union’s for­mer vice pres­i­dent, won the Point Fortin con­stituen­cy in the re­cent­ly con­clud­ed Gen­er­al Elec­tion and has been ap­point­ed Min­is­ter in the Min­istry of En­er­gy and En­er­gy Af­fairs. War­wick is the union’s chief ed­u­ca­tion and re­search of­fi­cer.

KCL Cap­i­tal filed the law­suit af­ter the prin­ci­pal and ac­crued in­ter­est un­der both loans were not paid.

In de­fence against the law­suit, the OW­TU claimed that KCL Cap­i­tal could not seek to en­force the agree­ments as, un­der its rules, it (the OW­TU) was not per­mit­ted to use the pro­ceeds of loans to set­tle the fees of le­gal, tech­ni­cal and fi­nan­cial con­sul­tants utilised for the ac­qui­si­tion bid.

Jus­tice Gob­in re­ject­ed the po­si­tion.

“The ar­gu­ment that the rules do not al­low the trans­ac­tions re­lies on an ex­pec­ta­tion that every pos­si­ble course of ac­tion which could pro­tect and pro­mote the in­ter­est of mem­bers would be spelt out and ex­press­ly pro­vid­ed for. This to my mind bor­ders on the ab­surd,” she said.

She al­so re­ject­ed claims that the agree­ments breached Sec­tion 17 of the Trade Unions Act.

The leg­is­la­tion makes it an of­fence for union ex­ec­u­tive mem­bers to fraud­u­lent­ly utilise a trade union’s fi­nances for pur­pos­es out­side of its rules.

“In the ab­sence of fraud, mis­rep­re­sen­ta­tion, or mis­con­duct, the trans­ac­tions en­tered in­to by the OW­TU were not caught by sec­tion 17,” she said.

Jus­tice Gob­in al­so re­ject­ed the union’s claim that it could not be held li­able as it was not un­just­ly en­riched by the loans.

She not­ed that KCL Cap­i­tal claimed that some of the mon­ey was paid to the union and the re­main­der to ser­vice providers it iden­ti­fied, and War­wick, who was the union’s main wit­ness, did not cat­e­gor­i­cal­ly de­ny that the union re­ceived part of the pro­ceeds.

Stat­ing that the OW­TU and Pa­tri­ot­ic shared a close re­la­tion­ship, Jus­tice Gob­in point­ed out that it (Pa­tri­ot­ic) was in­cor­po­rat­ed by War­wick, who served as its deputy chair­man.

“Even if I were to ac­cept that the OW­TU did not re­ceive any mon­ey from KCL, the ev­i­dence es­tab­lished the re­la­tion­ship be­tween the De­fen­dants with over­lap­ping di­rec­tors and of­fi­cials and their com­mon in­ten­tion to ac­quire and op­er­ate the re­fin­ery through Pa­tri­ot­ic, which was in­cor­po­rat­ed for that pur­pose,” she said.

“It does not lie in the mouth of the union to say it did not re­ceive the funds,” she added.

Guardian Me­dia at­tempt­ed to con­tact War­wick and OW­TU Pres­i­dent Gen­er­al An­cel Ro­get for a re­sponse, but calls to their cell phones went straight to voice­mail. Ke­sar, when con­tact­ed, said “un­for­tu­nate­ly, I have not seen the judg­ment you are re­fer­ring to. How­ev­er, you can al­ways check me back lat­er for feed­back.”

The OW­TU’s bid for the re­fin­ery was re­ject­ed by the eval­u­a­tion com­mit­tee es­tab­lished un­der the tenure of the for­mer Peo­ple’s Na­tion­al Move­ment (PNM) gov­ern­ment.

Late last year, for­mer en­er­gy min­is­ter Stu­art Young had claimed that Pa­tri­ot­ic did not progress to the next round of the bid­ding process due to a pur­port­ed­ly fraud­u­lent US$1.5 bil­lion wire trans­fer to its ac­counts.

In Feb­ru­ary, Young an­nounced that Niger­ian com­pa­ny Oan­do Trad­ing DM­CC had been se­lect­ed to lease the re­fin­ery.

How­ev­er, with the cur­rent Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress (UNC)-led coali­tion Gov­ern­ment led by Prime Min­is­ter Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar tak­ing of­fice, there is doubt over the pre­vi­ous arrange­ment.

The cur­rent ad­min­is­tra­tion has re­peat­ed­ly stat­ed that it would work with the OW­TU to at­tempt to restart the re­fin­ery’s op­er­a­tions.

KCL Cap­i­tal was rep­re­sent­ed by Dave Williams and Sta­cy-Ann Ramkhele­wan. The OW­TU was rep­re­sent­ed by Dou­glas Mendes, SC, An­tho­ny Bul­lock, and Alatashe Gir­van.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored