JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, May 17, 2025

Judge wants harsher penalties to protect environment

by

Radhica De Silva
2007 days ago
20191117
High court judge Frank Seepersad and wife, light candles at the Susamachar Presbyterian Church, on the occasion of Remembrance Day.

High court judge Frank Seepersad and wife, light candles at the Susamachar Presbyterian Church, on the occasion of Remembrance Day.

IVAN TOOLSIE

High Court Judge Frank Seep­er­sad says there should be stiffer penal­ties for those who dam­age the en­vi­ron­ment through il­le­gal quar­ry­ing, lit­ter­ing and oil spills.

De­liv­er­ing a ser­mon at the Susamachar Pres­by­ter­ian Church on Sun­day, Seep­er­sad called on cit­i­zens to plant more trees, use more LED light bulbs and re­cy­cle as much as they can.

He lament­ed the death of the corals at the Buc­coo Reef, and not­ed that T&T was fast los­ing oth­er nat­ur­al trea­sures be­cause of ex­ploita­tion.

“When we look at the world around us it is un­de­ni­able that our plan­et is in cri­sis. There is a glob­al food short­age. Sea lev­els have risen...the days are get­ting hot­ter. When the floods come it is as­ton­ish­ing to see the amount of garbage that is strewn in­to our na­tions’ wa­ter­cours­es,” Seep­er­sad said.

As a small is­land state, he said, cit­i­zens must be con­cerned about the en­vi­ron­ment and urged all cit­i­zens to act as stew­ards of the en­vi­ron­ment.

“We can­not sit by and al­low our en­vi­ron­ment to be sub­ject­ed to wan­ton de­struc­tion for short term re­wards. When il­le­gal quar­ry­ing takes place nat­ur­al habi­tats are de­stroyed and this neg­a­tive­ly im­pacts the wildlife, wa­ter­cours­es and the sur­round­ing com­mu­ni­ties,” Seep­er­sad said.

He not­ed that ex­ist­ing laws were not ef­fec­tive­ly as­sist­ing in the pro­tec­tion of the en­vi­ron­ment.

“There is a need for a suit­able leg­isla­tive frame­work to fos­ter sus­tain­able de­vel­op­ment, the use of our coun­try’s re­sources and the con­ser­va­tion of wildlife.

“A quick glance at our present laws re­veals a shock­ing truth that the penal­ties for en­vi­ron­men­tal dam­age and de­struc­tion are min­i­mal and hard­ly op­er­ate as a de­ter­rent,” he said.

He not­ed that coral reefs should be pro­tect­ed.

“As we fo­cus up­on eco­nom­ic di­ver­si­ty and the de­vel­op­ment of tourism, coral reefs can be a huge at­trac­tion but they are ex­treme­ly del­i­cate and pro­vide a home to a wide va­ri­ety of ma­rine life. Coral takes hun­dreds of years to grow one me­tre and we must pro­tect them and en­sure that ac­cess is reg­u­lat­ed. What was al­lowed to hap­pen to the Buc­coo Reef should nev­er hap­pen to any oth­er reef,” he added.

Seep­er­sad said if some­one dam­aged a reef with a boat an­chor, the penal­ty of $1,000 was hard­ly a de­ter­rent. Such min­i­mal penal­ties amount­ed to a slap in the face of sus­tain­able use and pro­tec­tion of our re­sources.

He added, “If a cit­i­zen is caught lit­ter­ing, de­pend­ing on whether the per­pe­tra­tor is an in­di­vid­ual or body cor­po­rate, un­der sec­tion 3 (6) of the Lit­ter Act, the fine can range be­tween $4,000 to $8,000.” Seep­er­sad al­so said the dev­as­tat­ing floods of Oc­to­ber 2018 oc­curred large­ly be­cause of in­dis­crim­i­nate dump­ing in wa­ter­cours­es.

“Oil spills from boats kill ma­rine life, pol­lute beach­es and af­fect the liveli­hood of fish­er­men who have to sup­port their fam­i­lies. Un­der the Oil pol­lu­tion and Ter­ri­to­r­i­al Act, the penal­ty for the dis­charge of oil in­to our ter­ri­to­r­i­al wa­ters is $10,000. This sum is in­signif­i­cant when one con­sid­ers the cost as­so­ci­at­ed with the clean up an oil spill,” he said.

Seep­er­sad ex­plained that in 2011, cit­i­zens were pro­hib­it­ed from killing or re­mov­ing tur­tles and eggs but un­der the Fish­eries Act, the penal­ty for such a breach was mere­ly $2,000.

Say­ing cit­i­zens must recog­nise the en­vi­ron­men­tal cri­sis and take steps im­me­di­ate­ly to sal­vage what was left, Seep­er­sad made sev­er­al rec­om­men­da­tions.

“We could pledge to dis­con­tin­ue the use of sin­gle-use plas­tics like plas­tic spoons, forks, plates and cups. We need to wean off plas­tic bags util­is­ing reusable bags. We can save the trees by min­imis­ing our use of pa­per,” he not­ed.

Seep­er­sad al­so said the youth could be mo­bilised to ac­tive­ly clean their sur­round­ings by hav­ing co-or­di­nat­ed vis­its to our beach­es and rivers.

“As a na­tion, we must hold each oth­er ac­count­able when we pol­lute our en­vi­ron­ment and we need to ac­tive­ly en­force our ex­ist­ing en­vi­ron­men­tal laws. We should al­so con­sid­er the im­ple­men­ta­tion of more strin­gent penal­ties. We should ac­tive­ly em­brace the use of so­lar en­er­gy. So­lar pan­els could be fixed to the roofs of our homes so that some ap­pli­ances or wa­ter heaters can be pow­ered,” he not­ed.

Seep­er­sad fur­ther said the use of long-last­ing bulbs like LED bulbs could as­sist in re­duc­ing green­house gas emis­sions while elec­tric cars could al­so have a last­ing im­pact on sav­ing the plan­et.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored