JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, July 28, 2025

Mixed reactions from Tobago stakeholders

by

Elizabeth Gonzales
230 days ago
20241210

The re­jec­tion of the To­ba­go au­ton­o­my bills in Par­lia­ment has left the is­land’s politi­cians and stake­hold­ers point­ing fin­gers, with some say­ing the bills’ re­turn to the House was noth­ing but a show.

While some ar­gued yes­ter­day that po­lit­i­cal games and di­vi­sion caused their fail­ure, oth­ers be­lieve the bills wouldn’t have brought any re­al change.

To­ba­go House of As­sem­bly Mi­nor­i­ty Leader Kelvon Mor­ris called the out­come a “deeply dis­ap­point­ing mo­ment for To­ba­go,” plac­ing blame square­ly on the Op­po­si­tion Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress (UNC) for pri­ori­tis­ing “po­lit­i­cal self-in­ter­est” over the is­land’s push for greater self-gov­er­nance.

He al­so bashed Chief Sec­re­tary Far­ley Au­gus­tine for what he de­scribed as “po­lit­i­cal ma­noeu­vring and a lack of uni­ty,” which he said dealt the fi­nal fa­tal blow to the bills.

“This will for­ev­er be a stain on To­ba­go’s quest for au­ton­o­my,” Mor­ris said, while com­mend­ing the Peo­ple’s Na­tion­al Move­ment (PNM) MPs for their votes to­ward the bill.

De­spite the set­back, he en­cour­aged To­bag­o­ni­ans not to lose hope, say­ing, “This is not the end of our fight. We live to dream an­oth­er day.”

How­ev­er, In­no­v­a­tive De­mo­c­ra­t­ic Al­liance (IDA) leader De Denise Tsoiafatt-An­gus wel­comed the re­jec­tion of the bills, ar­gu­ing that the pro­posed leg­is­la­tion would not have im­proved the lives of or­di­nary To­bag­o­ni­ans.

“These bills do not guar­an­tee the man on the street a bet­ter qual­i­ty of life. They give more dom­i­nance to Cab­i­net and the Ex­ec­u­tive Coun­cil while ig­nor­ing the needs of com­mu­ni­ties.”

Tsoiafatt-An­gus al­so crit­i­cised Au­gus­tine’s ap­proach, call­ing his last-minute use of What­sApp to com­mu­ni­cate with MPs and the prime min­is­ter as “dis­turb­ing and em­bar­rass­ing.”

She called for a broad­er and more in­clu­sive process say­ing, “This is not about your opin­ion, Chief Sec­re­tary. It’s not even about par­ty pol­i­tics. It must be a To­ba­go po­si­tion.”

To­ba­go Busi­ness Cham­ber chair­man Mar­tin George was not sur­prised by the out­come, de­scrib­ing the au­ton­o­my ef­forts as a “po­lit­i­cal cha­rade” in this in­stance. He ac­cused politi­cians of us­ing the is­sue as a “po­lit­i­cal foot­ball” while fail­ing to achieve mean­ing­ful re­forms.

George said, “It ap­pears that with the reg­u­lar cha­rade of these bills be­ing brought forth and the shenani­gans which ac­com­pa­ny them, you know, it’s been played out once again in the na­tion­al par­lia­ment. And too of­ten, it ap­pears that, you know, the po­lit­i­cal lead­ers use this as a po­lit­i­cal foot­ball, and they have.

He added: “To­bag­o­ni­ans chas­ing be­hind the ball, run­ning up and down the field while they keep shift­ing the goal post on them each time so that it be­comes im­pos­si­ble to score.”

He felt it was time To­ba­go fo­cus­es on fi­nan­cial au­ton­o­my, ex­plain­ing that fi­nan­cial in­de­pen­dence would em­pow­er To­ba­go to make its own de­ci­sions.

“Once you’re fi­nan­cial­ly au­tonomous, you don’t need to ask any­one for per­mis­sion to pur­sue in­de­pen­dence,” he said.

Mean­while, To­ba­go Di­vi­sion of the Trinidad and To­ba­go Cham­ber of In­dus­try and Com­merce chair­man Cur­tis Williams said more time was need­ed to ed­u­cate the pub­lic and ad­dress con­cerns raised by the THA.

“We need­ed more time to un­der­stand how these bills could ben­e­fit busi­ness­es and the wider To­ba­go pub­lic.”

Williams called for a fo­cus on in­creas­ing fund­ing and en­sur­ing fu­ture pro­pos­als are trans­par­ent and in­clu­sive.

Sen­a­tor An­cil Den­nis, po­lit­i­cal leader of the PNM’s To­ba­go Coun­cil, con­demned the UNC’s role in the bills’ fail­ure and crit­i­cised Au­gus­tine for un­der­min­ing the process with “jokey amend­ments.”

Den­nis, in a so­cial me­dia post, com­pared the sit­u­a­tion to 1996, say­ing To­ba­go re­mains trapped un­der the in­ad­e­quate To­ba­go House of As­sem­bly Act 40 of 1996, with lim­it­ed bud­getary al­lo­ca­tions and no leg­isla­tive pow­ers.

“This is a sad day for To­ba­go. I do not know if we will get an­oth­er chance to fix this in­jus­tice in my life­time,” he said.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored