JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, July 26, 2025

PM interview gets low rating from analysts

by

2020 days ago
20200114

SHAL­IZA HAS­SANALI

Apolo­getic and em­bar­rassed.

That's how po­lit­i­cal an­a­lyst Dr Win­ford James summed up Prime Min­is­ter Dr Kei­th Row­ley's re­sponse to the coun­try's soar­ing crime sit­u­a­tion in a 90-minute in­ter­view at White Hall which was aired on Sun­day.

The prime min­is­ter was ques­tioned on sev­er­al is­sues, rang­ing from crime, econ­o­my, the per­for­mance of his Cab­i­net since as­sum­ing of­fice and the de­crim­i­nal­i­sa­tion of mar­i­jua­na.

Touch­ing on crime which has be­come a thorn in the side of the rul­ing Gov­ern­ment, James said Row­ley ad­mit­ted that his ad­min­is­tra­tion had tried its best to bring the crime lev­els and mur­der rate down.

"In fact, he was apolo­getic in his an­swers. In the mat­ter of crime, for sure, and the in­abil­i­ty of the Gov­ern­ment to re­duce it to ac­cept­able lev­els. I think he was dis­ap­point­ed that de­spite his very good ef­forts the prob­lem keeps es­ca­lat­ing. I think there was dis­ap­point­ment that his Gov­ern­ment could not reign in crime in the way he would have want­ed to. I think there was a lit­tle em­bar­rass­ment as well," James said.

Row­ley ad­mit­ted that his Gov­ern­ment was fac­ing an on­go­ing crime wave and hoped that the pop­u­la­tion will not judge fair­ly based on their over­all per­for­mance as his ad­min­is­tra­tion pre­pares to ask the pop­u­la­tion for an­oth­er term in of­fice.

James said cit­i­zens will de­ter­mine the Gov­ern­ment's per­for­mance in the 2020 gen­er­al elec­tions.

"The pop­u­la­tion will de­cide whether we agree with your as­sess­ment, Dr Row­ley! What he was say­ing is gives us an­oth­er term in of­fice. We are on a good path. Look at some of the good things we have done."

In ret­ro­spect, James said Row­ley did not "con­cede fail­ure" but one of "re­gret."

He said the PM point­ed out that de­spite mak­ing some tough de­ci­sions, he was gen­er­al­ly pleased with his Gov­ern­ment's over­all per­for­mance.

How­ev­er, James said some of Row­ley's an­swers to the tough ques­tions were "vague and not spe­cif­ic."

Will cit­i­zens see the Gov­ern­ment's man­age­ment as a suc­cess head­ing in­to a gen­er­al elec­tion?

James said PNM sup­port­ers will ac­cept Row­ley as their leader while oth­ers will not sup­port him.

"That is the po­lar­i­sa­tion I am talk­ing about. I can't say if the pub­lic, in gen­er­al, will buy in­to Row­ley's ar­gu­ment on the eco­nom­ic front and re­turn his ad­min­is­tra­tion to pow­er."

In the in­ter­view, Row­ley ex­pressed dis­ap­point­ment with for­mer min­is­ters Dar­ryl Smith who was ac­cused of sex­u­al ha­rass­ment and Mar­lene Mc Don­ald who was ar­rest­ed last Au­gust on sev­en cor­rup­tion charges.

James felt Row­ley was "too ac­com­mo­dat­ing of Smith and Mc Don­ald," stat­ing that he gave Mc Don­ald three chances

"He could not go fur­ther with her."

James said he did not have suf­fi­cient in­for­ma­tion to speak about So­cial De­vel­op­ment and Fam­i­ly Ser­vices Min­is­ter Camille Robin­son-Reg­is' bank trans­ac­tions.

Row­ley said Robin­son-Reg­is would stay in his Cab­i­net un­til there is a change in the facts be­fore him.

Al­so weigh­ing in on the in­ter­view was po­lit­i­cal an­a­lyst Prof John La Guerre.

La Guerre said the PM should have been much more in­for­ma­tive and forth­com­ing with his an­swers.

"I think there are some de­fi­cien­cies some­where that he did not iden­ti­fy or could not iden­ti­fy. The mes­sage con­veyed to the pop­u­la­tion on crime was to be le­nient with him in an elec­tion year and that he has been try­ing his best with some mar­gin­al suc­cess."

La Guerre be­lieved Row­ley should have told the coun­try far more about his Gov­ern­ment's crime-fight­ing plans to al­lay the pop­u­la­tion's grow­ing fears.

"The is­sue of crime and crime man­age­ment is bound to have an im­pact on the way peo­ple see their fu­ture. This mat­ter of crime in­volves life and limb and has been of con­cern to those who have been im­pact­ed one way or the oth­er."

On the flip side, La Guerre said the mes­sage sent to the pop­u­la­tion by Row­ley was one of "promise and that bet­ter days are ahead."

The fact that Row­ley stat­ed that his great­est fail­ure un­der his stew­ard­ship was not en­gi­neer­ing eco­nom­ic growth, La Guerre said the PM should have dis­cussed more of Gov­ern­ment's ex­pec­ta­tions and im­pact on the coun­try's "nat­ur­al gas re­serves and oil ex­plo­rations."

Many is­sues in the en­er­gy sec­tor, La Guerre said were left hang­ing.

He said it would be dif­fi­cult for the pop­u­la­tion to view the Gov­ern­ment's eco­nom­ic man­age­ment as a suc­cess fol­low­ing the clo­sure of Petrotrin's re­fin­ery, thou­sands fac­ing the bread­line and a string of busi­ness­es shut­ting down op­er­a­tions due to a de­cline in eco­nom­ic ac­tiv­i­ty.

La Guerre said the PM's re­sponse to his Cab­i­net's per­for­mance was not one of glow­ing trib­ute to them.

"It was an ad­mis­sion that the Cab­i­net was not per­form­ing as he would have liked them to per­form."


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored