People’s National Movement (PNM) stalwarts are raising alarm over the party’s proposal to host its internal elections by the end of June, a move they say risks further destabilising the already shaken party.
On Monday, interim chairman Dr Nyan Gadsby-Dolly announced that a special general council meeting is scheduled for Friday to finalise the election date. The party also intends to establish an election supervisory committee to oversee the process.
All positions are expected to be contested, including political leader, chairman, vice chairman, lady vice chairman, general secretary, assistant general secretary, and several officer roles. The slate also includes three deputy political leaders appointed by the political leader, and one from Tobago.
PNM stalwart Ferdie Ferreira and former general secretary Ashton Ford have voiced concern over the party’s current instability, citing the absence of a political leader and the resulting incomplete executive.
“The party had never functioned without a leader in its history,” Ferreira said yesterday, as he questioned the role of Opposition Leader Pennelope Beckles in the current leadership vacuum.
“If you could give her that confidence to lead the party in the highest office in the land, the Parliament, why don’t you make her interim political leader? So, she has a role to play in the leadership of the party,” he said.
He recalled the precedent set in 2010, when the party filled vacancies following the resignation of Patrick Manning, chairman Conrad Enill and general secretary Martin Joseph. Dr Keith Rowley, then political leader, had appointed Ashton Ford as general secretary, a decision later ratified by the general council.
“So why they can’t do the same thing with Penny? Put her in as interim until the convention. But you see the problem is that it’s a number of them aspiring to be leader,” Ferreira said.
Ford echoed those concerns, warning that rushing the “one man, one vote” internal election process could lead to confusion and errors.
“I believe they want to get it out of the way. But getting it out of the way and having it as short notice is a recipe for chaos. Because in hustling to do things, you might make mistakes.”
Ford noted that a sanitised list of valid electors is essential and cited that he had to reject 10,000 applicants before the 2014 elections. He recommended sticking with the original September timeline for an orderly and credible convention.
While Ford acknowledged Beckles’ popularity, he added: “There’s no need to rush into a leadership contest.”
Meanwhile, political scientist Dr Bishnu Ragoonath suggested that while Beckles is likely to win, he suspected she may still face competition from Dr Amery Browne, Robert Le Hunte, and possibly Camille Robinson-Regis. He said Stuart Young may be a less likely contender due to his General Election loss.
“If Pennelope Beckles is one of the nominees for political leader, I think the rank and file membership may very well go along with her being both the political leader and the opposition leader... they would want to get away from the dual-headed leadership,” he said.
Ragoonath, however, viewed the controversy over the interim appointment of Gadsby-Dolly and Colm Imbert as insignificant.
In a brief response to the PNM Changemakers 2025 group, which has been vocally critical of the party, Dr Browne declined to respond directly.
“I am not inclined at this stage to publicly respond to any faceless anonymous group that is being used to advance a particular line of ambition,” he said.
Instead, he reaffirmed his commitment to a “more caring and relevant” PNM.
The Changemakers, in a statement issued yesterday, said the special general council meeting set for Friday violates the party’s constitutional requirement of seven days’ notice.
The group has called for transparency and the resignation of general secretary Foster Cummings.